The Day All The Patent Trolls Rushed To File New Lawsuits
from the because-of-fee-shifting dept
The Senate is still working on patent reform, despite the House approving it months ago. However, you can be sure that patent trolls and their lawyers have been watching the space carefully. One of the proposed amendments on the Senate side would concern fee shifting -- making the losing party have to pay the winning party's legal bills -- and in the amendment it says it would go into effect, on April 24, 2014. Even though the bill has not yet gone anywhere and the amendment may not make it, it would appear that trolls and their lawyers (often one and the same) realized that if they wanted to avoid fee shifting, they'd better get filing. And, boy, did they ever file a lot of patent infringement cases on Wednesday April 23rd: 190 cases. In case you're wondering, the day before 8 patent cases were filed.But just that number alone might not give you enough perspective to understand this mad rush to the courts (or, well, as we'll see, one court in particular) to file patent lawsuits. The good folks over at Lex Machina have put together some data to show just how noteworthy all those patent lawsuit filings are. Here are the daily patent lawsuit filings for the first four months of 2014. Notice any particular outlier?
Of course, this also shows that trolls know they have questionable claims and that they fear fee shifting mightily. It's why any patent reform bill needs strong fee shifting provisions to deal with such bogus lawsuits.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: delaware, east texas, fee shifting, lawsuits, patents
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Driving innovation like a broken engine
Can anyone who doesn't have a vested interest in protecting such shakedown schemes claim this is some sort of 'accident' or 'coincidence'? Because it's pretty freakin' clear to me, the ones filing all these lawsuits know full well that if their targets are able to fight back, without having to worry about the legal fees if they win, then they are going to get curb-stomped by any reasonable court, hence the mad rush shown here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Driving innovation like a broken engine
In other words, some of these lawsuits may have been hastily filed with a "might as well do it now to see if we can pull it off" even if they didn't really know that it was going to be worthwhile anyway.
In any case, I suspect this will have some silver lining - as these hastily-filed suits are probably going to be of even worse average quality than usual - and we'll see an even stronger reason to reform patent litigation in the future as these pan out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The cases address the fundamental concern that led to the proposed provision in the bill, but do so in a way that retains vitality of the reason that underlies the US system.
The provision has been, or so it seems, OBE and should be stricken from the bill.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Interesting Precipitation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Time to Amend the Amendment...
1) Make a list of the people, companies, whomever, that filed on the 23rd and publish it to the public so we know who the trolls are.
2) Change the amendment to make the fee shifting retroactive to April 1, 2014.
3) Pass the damn bill.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Patent cases can be very unpredictable, for example an unexpected, obscure document could invalidate an otherwise perfectly reasonable-looking patent. If filing the case a bit earlier will significantly reduce the cost of losing, why wouldn�t you file earlier, even if you are confident of your position?
That said, I�m happy to believe that the huge spike in filings has a lot to do with patent trolls.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fee Shifting
One of these patent reform bills speaks to awarding fees and costs only to losing plaintiffs. If the accused patent infringer loses, they don't have to pay the patent owner's fees and costs, which can be significant and sometime more than the actual damages award.
Patent litigation is the most expensive litigation there is and only a fool would start an infringement suit without thinking that they had a very good chance of winning.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
more dissembling by Masnick
Can you say �dissemble�?
Property rights and jobs in America are now hanging from a frayed thread. Congress and the White House continue to follow the lead of their multinational campaign donors like lambs...pulling America along to the slaughter.
Just because they call it patent "reform" doesn't mean it is.
All this patent troll and �reform� talk is mere dissembling by China, huge multinational thieves and their paid puppets.
http://www.npr.org/player/v2/mediaPlayer.html?action=1&t=1&islist=false&id=276448190& ;m=276545654&live=1
http://www.npr.org/2013/11/06/243022966/secret-persuasion-how-big-campaign-do nors-stay-anonymous
They have already damaged the American patent system so that property rights are teetering on lawlessness. Simply put, their intent is to legalize theft -to twist and weaken the patent system so it can only be used by them and no one else. Then they can steal at will and destroy their small competitors AND WITH THEM THE JOBS THEY WOULD HAVE CREATED. Meanwhile, the huge multinationals ship more and more American jobs to China and elsewhere overseas.
Do you know how to make a Stradivarius violin? Neither does anyone else. Why? There was no protection for creations in his day so he like everyone else protected their creations by keeping them secret. Civilization has lost countless creations and discoveries over the ages for the same reason. Think we should get rid of or weaken patent rights? Think again.
Most important for America is what the patent system does for America�s economy. Our founders: Jefferson, Franklin, Madison and others felt so strongly about the rights of inventors that they included inventors rights to their creations and discoveries in the Constitution. They understood the trade off. Inventors are given a limited monopoly and in turn society gets the benefits of their inventions (telephone, computer, airplane, automobile, lighting, etc) into perpetuity and the jobs the commercialization of those inventions bring. For 200 years the patent system has not only fueled the American economy, but the world�s. If we weaken the patent system, we force inventors underground like Stradivarius and in turn weaken our economy and job creation. For a robust economy America depends on a strong patent system accessible to all -large and small, not the watered down weak system the large multinationals and China are foisting on America.
For the truth, please see http://www.truereform.piausa.org/
http://piausa.wordpress.com/
http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2014/04/18/for-whom-the-bell-tolls-the-us-patent-system/id=49067/
http://ww w.hoover.org/publications/defining-ideas/article/142741
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: more dissembling by Masnick
The Congress shall have Power To...promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries....
ARTICLE I, SECTION 8, CLAUSE 8
Patents were never intended to be treated as a property right and are not treated as such in court.
Patents don't keep anything secret.
The telephone, airplane, light bulb, and many other inventions we take for granted were not invented by the patent holders. See Thomas Edison for details.
A strong patent system simply permits trolling over stupid things like slide to unlock. We could probably do without patents on anything, as we did for thousands of years.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: more dissembling by Masnick
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why did the thought, "zombies" just pop in to my head.....and ground zero...........im scared right now
[ link to this | view in chronology ]