One Single Porn Copyright Troll, Malibu Media, Accounted For Nearly 40% Of All Copyright Lawsuits This Year
from the shakedown dept
We've written about porn copyright troll Malibu Media a bunch of times in the past, including noting late last year that it had filed over 1,100 copyright lawsuits in 2013 alone. Many who follow copyright trolling have noted that Malibu Media's practices (and those of the lawyers who represent it) may be much worse than even Prenda, who has become synonymous with questionable copyright trolling practices. The New Yorker has written up a profile of Malibu Media and its copyright trolling, generously referring to the company as an "erotica" website.Matthew Sag, who has written up an empirical study on copyright trolling, with lots of data, notes that Malibu Media alone is swamping the court system with lawsuits. Of 872 copyright claims filed in the first quarter of 2014, 343 of them were from Malibu Media. Sag also recently updated his chart showing different types of copyright lawsuits, from "regular" copyright lawsuits, those against "porn John Does" and "other John Does." The "red" sections for "porn John Does" is basically almost entirely Malibu Media at this point (back in 2011 and 2012, many were Prenda).
![](https://i.imgur.com/tjBcrdXm.jpg)
![Hide This Hide this](https://ii.techdirt.com/s/t/i/topclose.png)
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, copyright trolling, porn
Companies: malibu media
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
People Sued
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Translation: I'm obsessed! I want Mike's babies!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I'm curious why this comment is always censored. It's true, is it not?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
1) It's spam. That exact same line is posted constantly, on pretty much any article that isn't gushing about how awesome copyright law is, and how it's never abused(so all articles basically).
2) It's an ad hom. Much like sending a child to the corner when they throw a tantrum or start calling people 'butthead'(and really, it's the same maturity level in both cases), if your entire 'argument' is an insult, don't be surprised if people click report to hide it(hide mind, when it takes all of one click to reveal something, it's hardly 'censored').
2.5) It's not even an accurate insult at that, being nothing more than a strawman attack, based upon the flawed idea that copyright can never be abused, so any use of it is legitimate 'enforcement', meaning anyone who criticizes it can only be doing so because they're 'against copyright enforcement'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
No. Mike hates the *abuse* of copyright to enable extortion and threats that would otherwise be illegal.
There's no honest person who can justify Malibu and other troll's actions or realistically classify them as "enforcement".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
No, it is not. Nor is hiding spam from the view of people who do not wish to view it censorship.
After all this time, these simple facts have not made it through your skull. How can you hope to understand and address the actual issues being discussed by people who know more than how to copy and paste the same lies thread after thread? You can't - you address fictions.
Stop whining or start reading, because repeating the same incorrect action over and over will not gain any change in results. As your heroes in the **AAs need to learn this, so do you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
AC just hates it when so called enforcement turns out to be a scam!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: finally some due process
Could you stick your manhood up my ass so I can have your babies?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This one comes up quite a bit too but never gets reported. Must be true, huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Movies
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
missing stats
Were any records of any kind kept of these completely-out-of-court extortion "successes"?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: missing stats
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: missing stats
[ link to this | view in chronology ]