US Marshals Have A Classic CC/BCC Error And Reveal Bidders For Silk Road's Bitcoins
from the protecting-your-privacy dept
Oh those wacky US Marshals. As you may have heard, they recently began to auction off the Bitcoins seized when Silk Road was shut down (though, some may argue it's a little early given that the trial over the site hasn't happened yet). However, the US Marshals then pulled off one of the oldest email errors around, including the list of possible bidders in the "cc:" field instead of the "bcc:" field. This is like a 1990s-era mistake. The Marshal Service has apologized, noting that the email was just sent to people who had emailed in questions about the auction (so, not necessarily bidders), but it still seems like a pretty big faux pas.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: auction, bitcoin, bitcoins, email, privacy, silk road, us marshals
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Trial hasn't even happened yet and they're already diving up the spoils as though the guilty verdict had already been handed out, no guesses how the ruling on that one is going to go, no matter what evidence or lack thereof gets provided.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
'No, no!' said the Queen. 'Sentence first—verdict afterwards.'
'Stuff and nonsense!' said Alice loudly. 'The idea of having the sentence first!'
'Hold your tongue!' said the Queen, turning purple.
'I won't!' said Alice.
'Off with her head!' the Queen shouted at the top of her voice. Nobody moved.
——Lewis Caroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, 1865
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
a contest we could do without
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who I fear most
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Let's face it folks. The Government and its agencies are simply the biggest and richest "gangs" in town.
They stopped battling the MAFIA once they discovered they could make more money by partnering up with them.
Politics is the slickest form of Organized Crime, because, its legal.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is corruption in our government. A violation of the 4th amendment in the name of "Justice", one that this amendment was specifically created to prevent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh well, if anyone tries to sue over the bcc error, they'll just deputize the secretary.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I guess a buyers wallet can be forfeited when it is used with an obviously criminal wallet...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Accident?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Accident?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]