Verizon Math Strikes Again: Promises 2 Years Of Free Data Access To Chromebook Users; Delivers Just 1
from the math-is-difficult dept
Verizon isn't exactly known for its math skills. It's taken some flack in the past for some hilariously wrong claims, sometimes creating ridiculously confused discussions. For the most part, that's just been some very confused customer service folks who are unable to figure out how decimal places work. However, it may now have reached an institutional level. On Monday, JR Raphael at Computerworld noted that when Google and Verizon started selling the LTE Chromebook Pixel last year, part of the pitch was that it came with 100MB per month of data access from from Verizon.
Verizon is telling customers that as far as it's concerned, the plans were valid only for one year -- and that's why those initiated last spring are now expiring. I called the carrier's customer service line and, after holding for 15 minutes and then talking in circles to an agent for another 10, was able to get through to a supervisor. That person politely told me he wasn't aware of any two-year commitment and that -- despite my pointing out official documentation to the contrary -- there was nothing he could do to help me.To make matters even more confusing (and/or appealing to lawyers...), Google's original announcement actually promised three years, and that's still online as I type this (screenshot below in case it disappears):
We understand that some Chromebook Pixel customers may have lost their promotional data, 100MB a month for two years, early… We apologize for this and are working on a solution for those customers.Of course, as Broadband Reports notes, it appears that the class action lawyers are already swarming around the "misleading advertising" effort, and there's a decent chance of a lawsuit soon. Google's quick promise of credit will probably limit that damage, and I wouldn't be surprised to see Verizon offer something similar pretty quickly as well to minimize the threat of a lawsuit. Either way, the situation is fairly ridiculous -- whether it was crossed signals on whatever deal Google and Verizon had, or if there was just some bad math involved.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: chromebook, chromebook pixel, free data, math, verizon math
Companies: google, verizon
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
on two-year contract.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Verizon's New Math
Google's 3 year service offer minus Verizon's 2 year service offer equals 1 year of service.
That was easy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Google Fixed It
Verizon sucks, Google did the right thing. Maybe they'll know better to partner w/ VZW the next time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Google Fixed It
... and then sued/settled with Verizon Wireless for contract failure.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Google Fixed It
I understand the frustration but getting involved in a legal war with VZW - which you need for your customers to use your phones - is not the "right thing" for anyone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
vzw holds back innovation, like Google Wallet, in favor of isis - which never took off.
or, like updates. vzw regularly holds back system updates in hopes that you will just give up and buy a new phone
why does google continue to try and be nice to them?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Or Phones, by refusing to carry certain phones and holding their LTE spectrum as ransom.
Verizon is about as bad as they come.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So that's what happened to Verizon's digital wallet.
Verizon would have been better off letting Google's Wallet alone (or at least come up with a name change).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
After all, new phones usually are subsidized. And while the new phone extends the contract commitment another two years, it's still less expensive for them to have you update your phone and continue month-to-month. The risk of you switching carriers is low.
I believe that Verizon has actually bitten off more than they expected. They really want to further monetize their customer base. They want the phone to be shopping portal into their stores. So they customize their phones. But each effort has been a failure. My ancient minimal-feature phone keeps trying to sell me ringtones, music and web browsing by putting their store on the keys most likely to be hit accidentally. They made lots of money on ringtones (remember spending $1 or more for a few notes?) but nothing since then has made significant profit. Without a new revenue opportunity, they don't see any reason to put the work into an update. And allowing an update to generic Android would get rid of the work they put into locking partner apps into the phone.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Which is precisely why why the first thing I do with a new phone is replace the OS that came on it with a nice, new, clean copy of Android (I prefer Cyanogenmod, but there are many others). No shovelware, no spyware, no features (such as tethering) being artificially restricted, and I can easily upgrade as new versions of android come out.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Oh I see...
Too bad I'll never do business with them because they're so clever.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Saved me a long time wrestling with Verizon tech "support"
Here's hoping that company-v-company legal issues and class action lawsuits end up costing Verizon 10-100 times as much as they "saved" by their cheapskate, short-sighted action. I'm not saying it would make their management any smarter, but c'mon... 100 MB/month? That's a few minutes of heavy web surfing. All this plan was good for (and intended for) was light use with Google Docs or emergency lookups when wi-fi was not available.
We were already in the process of switching our phones off Verizon (to T-Mobile). Now we'll just add the Chromebook to our plan for unlimited data @$10/month. Thanks, Verizon, for removing any doubts we might have had about this choice!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Saved me a long time wrestling with Verizon tech "support"
I figured the Chromebooks were pretty well locked to Verizon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Saved me a long time wrestling with Verizon tech "support"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]