Texas Dept. Of Public Safety Quietly Starts Demanding Full Set Of Prints From Drivers License Applicants

Vint Cerf Calmly Explains Why You Should Stop Freaking Out About NTIA Handover Of ICANN

from the it-doesn't-mean-crap dept

Wed, Jul 23rd 2014 8:33pm — Mike Masnick

Back in March, we wrote a story explaining why the National Telecommunications and Information Administration's (NTIA) decision to "relinquish" what little "power" it had over ICANN was no big deal. It's sort of an accident of history that NTIA (a part of the US Commerce Department) even had any "mandate" over the IANA functions -- which manages domain name allocations. The "control" over ICANN/IANA has always been mostly a paper thing. ICANN is really run by a large group of folks -- the so-called "multistakeholders." I think many of us can agree that ICANN policies are currently a mess, but that has nothing to do with the NTIA's technical connection to it.

If anything, the NTIA's paper link to ICANN only served to undermine the goals of good internet governance, because it allowed other countries to falsely imply that the US government "owned" or "controlled" the internet -- opening up dangerous attempts for foreign governments to try to really take control of the internet, wiping out the multistakeholder process and replacing it entirely by governments. That would be dangerous.

Unfortunately, as we expected when we wrote our original "this means absolutely nothing" post, some people decided to freak out about it. They've insisted that NTIA's move is the US handing over the internet, potentially to foreign governments. That those same individuals have previously insisted that things like "net neutrality" are the "government taking over the internet" -- and the inherent contradiction therein -- is never really mentioned. Unfortunately, some in Congress are trying to make a big deal out of this by totally misrepresenting what's been going on.

In response, the NTIA has told everyone to calm down, but the absolute best response has to be from the "father of the internet," Vint Cerf, the guy who set up ICANN in the first place, giving his best "knowing uncle storytime" explanation of why everyone should calm down about all of this, and how, if anything, it should lead to better oversight of the ICANN IANA process. Oh, and if you watch all the way through, you might just see Vint Cerf riding a grumpy cat under a double rainbow. Because this is the internet.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: congress, department of commerce, iana, internet governance, ntia, vint cerf
Companies: icann

6 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2014 @ 2:36am

- USA: They want to break our interwebz!!11
- Rest of the world: Finally, we have decentralization.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anonymous Coward, 24 Jul 2014 @ 8:27am

I thought Al Gore was the father of the internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Matthew A. Sawtell, 24 Jul 2014 @ 9:32am

So... who are stakeholders of the 9 organizations listed at 1:45?
Hm... who would be the stakeholders for the 9 organizations listed at 1:45 of the presentation?

ARIN
LACNIC
RIPE
NCC
APNIC
AFRINIC
ISOC
IETF
IAB

If we are going to honest about this, there should have been at least a weblink for all of these organizations listed at the end of the video or in the about section with the Youtube entry.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Matthew A. Sawtell, 24 Jul 2014 @ 9:46am
  
  Re: So... who are stakeholders of the 9 organizations listed at 1:45?
  Here is what I could find - please let me know if any of the nine sites listed is incorrect. Mind you, should have listed RIPE & NCC together, but I did see a reference on the websites for the first five organizations for the last organization listed.
  
  ARIN (American Registry for Internet Numbers) - https://www.arin.net/
  LACNIC (Latin America and Caribbean Network Information Centre) - http://www.lacnic.net/
  RIPE NCC (Reseaux IP Europeens Network Cooridination Centre) - http://www.ripe.net/
  APNIC (Asia-Pacific Network Information Centre) - https://www.apnic.net/
  AFRINIC (African Network Information Center) - http://www.afrinic.net/
  ISOC (Internet Society) - http://www.internetsociety.org/
  IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) - http://www.ietf.org/
  IAB (Interactive Advertising Bureau) - http://www.iab.net/
  
  IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) - https://www.iana.org/
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
  - Matthew A. Sawtell, 24 Jul 2014 @ 5:58pm
    
    Re: Re: So... who are stakeholders of the 9 organizations listed at 1:45?
    Sometimes it is more interesting to see who does not comment on certain articles than who does.
    [ link to this | view in chronology ]
Jeremy, 25 Jul 2014 @ 5:50pm

Hate to say it but...
democratic does not equal "Free" and "Open". Just because lots of people have a say in how something is run, does not mean those same people are considering the freedom of all users first.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]