How Redacting 'Just 15%' Can Hide The Details Of CIA's Torture Program
from the here's-an-example dept
As the fight over the redactions on the CIA torture report continue, it's worth reminding folks how you can totally change the story with just a few well placed redactions. Director of National Intelligence has insisted that just 15% was redacted -- though, as Marcy Wheeler points out, the part that's being declassified is just the exec summary, which was written specifically to get around the redactor's ink, since the details are buried in the full report, which will likely remain classified for a while. In other words, the vast, vast majority of the report is still "redacted." Still, even a 15% redaction can do a lot of damage and hide a lot of facts. Senator Mark Udall has made it clear that the existing redactions make parts of the report "incomprehensible" in an effort to hide embarrassing information from the public.Reed Richardson decided to do a fairly simple demonstration to show just how much a 15% redaction can bury key points. He took President Obama's statement about how "we tortured some folks" and redacted "just 15%" of it (though such that if you look closely, you can see what's covered). Notice how the key elements -- the admission of torture -- simply fade away...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: barack obama, cia, james clapper, redactions, senate intelligence committee, torture report
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Mad libs anyone
2 names
noun
noun
noun
...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Classic example of totally changing the meaning of a sentence. Just mouse over to reveal the redacted parts.
Note: sense of humor advised
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Censorship is the restriction of expression for the purpose of protecting people from reality by selectively limiting access to various ideas deemed harmful by some authority.
becomes
Censorship is protecting people from harm
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Citing Uncyclopedia as comment on censorship? Deliciously ironic
...because, in its infinite evil, Wikia has censored the Uncyclopedia in its entirety - shitcanning the entire wiki in a couple of dozen languages. See uncyclopedia.ca/wiki/Forum:A%20message%20from%20Fandom for the details.
...or try uncyclopedia.ca/wiki/Censorship as maybe that one's still up. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Typical
To destroy the value of the sentence, only one of the major words must be removed:
Original:
Johnny ate the bright red apple.
Critical words removed:
XXXXXX ate the bright red apple.
Johnny XXXXXX the bright red apple.
Johnny ate the bright red XXXXXX.
So I would expect 15% redactions to remove the sense of pretty much anything.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
An apt analogy...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]