CFAA: Still Broken And Congress Is Unlikely To Fix It Any Time Soon

from the your-random-reminder dept

There's been some attention paid to a recent Forbes article that confirms what pretty much everyone has always said: Congress won't move forward with reforming the CFAA. There's nothing particularly new in the article. It's just rehashing things that were hashed out over the past few years: the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, a very out-of-date law concerning hacking, has been abused mightily for decades, well beyond its intended purpose. It got lots of attention as the law being used against Aaron Swartz, but the abuses started long before that. However, many tech companies, led by Oracle, have fought against reform (in part because they use the threat of the law to keep employees from running off with trade secrets, even though there are other laws for that). At the same time, the DOJ would actually like to make the law even worse.

And, in the simplistic minds of many in Congress, if the big industry associated with the issue and the government don't want the necessary reforms -- even if the public is interested in such reforms -- it's just not worth doing. This doesn't necessarily mean that CFAA reform won't eventually happen, but like ECPA reform, patent reform and other related issues, very little can actually get through Congress these days. So in many cases, in the minds of certain folks in Congress, it's just not worth trying, even if it's the right thing to do.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: aaron's law, cfaa, congress, hacking, politics


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. icon
    Mason Wheeler (profile), 7 Aug 2014 @ 4:00pm

    And thus we see, yet again, the harm done by trade secrets. This is a concept that needs to be eradicated in its entirety.

    Patents were supposed to have done away with trade secrets. This is literally the purpose that patents were created for: to give tradesmen a strong incentive to publish their discoveries, rather than keeping them secret and then the secret all too often ends up dying with them. But somewhere along the line, things went sideways, and we ended up enshrining protection for trade secrets in law instead of working to stamp them out, and time and time again we see the harm that that causes.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    John Fenderson (profile), 7 Aug 2014 @ 4:44pm

    No surprises anywhere

    Led by Oracle, huh?

    There's another non-surprise. Oracle is one of (and often the) the worst of the tech companies.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Aug 2014 @ 5:34pm

    "CFAA: Still Broken And Congress Is Unlikely To Fix It Any Time Soon"

    It's rather futile expecting something that is broken to be fixed by something that is broken.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    Padpaw (profile), 7 Aug 2014 @ 8:11pm

    the whole bloody government is broken at this point.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 7 Aug 2014 @ 8:57pm

    Re:

    And this is why we can not have nice things.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    Whatever (profile), 7 Aug 2014 @ 10:49pm

    A couple of things here. This story matches up nicely with the defunding story: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140806/15344028132/attempt-to-frame-justin-amashs-protection-civ il-liberties-as-supporting-terrorists-fails-miserably-polls.shtml

    Why? It shows the real malaise of Washington isn't one side or the other, rather that the critters play for the camera and don't actually work to fix things.

    For me the second part here is that you should be careful what you wish for. If the CFAA gets fixed, it's likely that the laws would get tougher and much more specific, and woudl almost certainly end making certain grey area activities into cold hard criminal acts.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Aug 2014 @ 5:08am

    Re:

    I think the word "fixed" in case refers to being put six under.


    "the real malaise of Washington isn't one side or the other,"
    ... it's the corruption, greed and general lackadaisical attitude.

    In addition, claiming both sides are the same is obviously incorrect.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Aug 2014 @ 5:17am

    Re:

    I can quite often fix things with a broken screwdriver!?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Aug 2014 @ 5:19am

    Re:

    Most of the issues in Washington stem from money and greed.

    Oracle (much like the MAFIAA) spends millions on 'Lobbying' to make sure that laws always go in their favour, usually against the public.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 8 Aug 2014 @ 5:27am

    Re: Re:

    The right tool for the right job then?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. icon
    John Fenderson (profile), 8 Aug 2014 @ 8:19am

    Re:

    "If the CFAA gets fixed, it's likely that the laws would get tougher and much more specific, and woudl almost certainly end making certain grey area activities into cold hard criminal acts."

    Which, even if I disagreed with certain choices about what got criminalized, would still be an improvement over what we have now. What we have now effectively lets prosecutors decide what is criminal and what is not.

    A clear definition of what is criminal and what is not is essential. Without that, actual justice is impossible.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    GEMont, 8 Aug 2014 @ 12:15pm

    Justice is Blonde

    Silly Rabbit!

    T'aint broken.

    Its written exactly the way they want it written and does precisely what they want it to do.

    Why on earth would they do anything to change that!??

    Don't tell me you think the American Justice System is about Justice still! Under the current system, Justice can see with 20/20 vision and its the public that's blind.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. icon
    That One Guy (profile), 8 Aug 2014 @ 7:30pm

    Re: Re:

    A clear definition of what is criminal and what is not is essential. Without that, actual justice is impossible.

    Also, isn't there a saying about how 'the best way to get rid of a bad law is to enforce it completely'? Maybe if they started publicly cracking down on things that are currently given a pass until the prosecution wants to score some easy PR, people might start calling for a real fix.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.