Intellectual Ventures Aims To Tax Wind Power Producers With New Batch Of Patents
from the because-patent-trollery-is-designed-to-tax-innovation dept
Wind Power Monthly (I had no idea such a thing existed) has an article about how Intellectual Ventures is apparently targeting its patent trollery towards wind power, having filed a bunch of patents on very broad and basic concepts related to wind power. Of course, IV is trying to hide its involvement here by using one of its many shell companies. For reasons that are beyond me, Wind Power Monthly declines to name the shell companies. It's not clear why it does this -- even withholding the name after it got IV to confirm that it's an IV shell. There seems to be no journalistic reason for withholding the name, but Wind Power Monthly still does it.Asked about the IV holding company, a spokesperson confirmed its relationship and added: "Intellectual Ventures does file some patents invented during sessions held by its in-house invention group... under the holding company [name withheld] to help maintain its patent portfolio."The report further warns that patent trolls appear to be on the lookout to buy up other broad, wind power-related patents on the cheap as this particular market is expanding.
Second or third-tier wind manufacturers may be most exposed to trolls, especially as wind patents are currently relatively cheap, as they are during any downturn. Such manufacturers are a worthwhile target financially, may not have a robust IP strategy, and are far more likely to settle rather than fight in court.Of course, right now we should be helping to speed up the adoption of alternative energy sources like wind power, but these patent trolling activities do the exact opposite, they make it more expensive. Notice that the article doesn't talk about any of these methods actually advancing the pace of innovation in the field, mostly because they don't. These aren't companies with experience building or managing wind power systems. These aren't experiences learned in the field. They appear to be pure trolling techniques designed to put a toll on the companies actually innovating in the field.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: innovation, patent trolls, patents, shell companies, toll booths, wind power
Companies: intellectual ventures
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Cashin' in
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
These patents are for the birds.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why am I reminded of Xerxes ordering the Sea to be Whipped...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Don Quixote, is that you?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Withholding name of Intellectual Vultures shell company
A. Because when you're dealing with crazy people, you try not to get sued.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
XKCD
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Withholding name of Intellectual Vultures shell company
"The holding company in question is not obviously associated with IV, which could give IV a strategic advantage and avoid patent prices being hiked because of its financial strength."
So they are duping patent holders and still actively buying patents and striking deals with existing holders in this field as well as concurrently filing their own.
Gotta also love:
"the [IV holding co's] inventors – some of whom used to work for a major US government laboratory".
Career advice to self for next reincarnation: "Do taxpayer funded research, retire or leave, cha-ching-ching-ching with all those ideas I kept to myself"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Smell a Rat, . . Surprise, a Rat.
Oh yeah, former USTR Ron Kirk, pusher of ACTA and TPP, was also a co-chair of COMPETE. Kirk Cutting Close on Lobbying. POLITICO, Jan. 28, 2009.
How far do these sewer pipes go, anyway?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
This was useful and important for me to know because those publications are a writer's dream -- they have a voracious need for content, they have a very well-defined audience, and they usually have a very distinctive voice. All of that together means that it is relatively easy to sell articles to them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
If there is an audience, there will be a publication. I can remember 20 years ago a friend spotting a tabloid-newspaper-style publication in my living room called "Law Technology Product News", and being amazed that there was a magazine for such a narrow audience (which I happened to be a part of at the time). If there is a market for a product, there will be a publication about that market. Then it was magazines, now it is websites.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Nathan Myhrvold
Sincerely,
Nathan Myhrvold
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not really. If alternative technologies produce reliable power at a good price, then obviously we should support them.
But if they mainly convert government subsidies into profits, with intermittent power as a byproduct, then we should not.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Smell a Rat, . . Surprise, a Rat.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Smell a Rat, . . Surprise, a Rat.
I guess it only makes sense. People will keep buying oil and gas, because they will keep making the alternatives more expensive.
Its a shame that the government makes this possible. They are working against themselves here. The EPA pushes alternatives while the USPTO allows others to suppress them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Smell a Rat, . . Surprise, a Rat.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What's good for the goose...
Our entire economy depends on affordable energy. That means we need to eliminate *all* obstacles to abundant energy production:
* Innovators in wind and solar need to be free of patent trollery
* Producers of nuclear energy need to be able to proliferate instead of having all their projects blocked
* Distributors of conventional oil/gas/coal energy need to be able to conduct their business instead of getting taxed out of existence by the "global warming" bogeyman.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: What's good for the goose...
[ link to this | view in thread ]