News Corp. Sends Angry Lawyers In When Other Publications Use Leaked Documents To Report On Its Failing Businesses
from the despite-doing-the-same-to-others... dept
Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. has a rather long and somewhat sordid history of obtaining confidential information and publishing it. But apparently when someone else does that to News Corp., the company declares war. The Australian website Crikey got its hands on some internal News Corp. documents showing how badly its Australian newspapers were performing. The financial results were disastrous. Apparently, News Corp. didn't take the story particularly well and sent in its angry lawyers:In a letter to general counsels at Fairfax Media, Seven West Media, APN News & Media, the ABC, SBS, Nine Entertainment Co and Ten Network Holdings, Ian Philip, chief general counsel at News Corp Australia, wrote: “It has come to the attention of News Limited that Crikey.com.au has today published documents and information which is highly confidential and commercially sensitive to News.Soon after this, Crikey and News Corp. "reached a legal agreement" whereby Crikey agreed to take down and "destroy" the document, but with no gag order or injunction on its reporting over what was in the document.
“In particular, Crikey has published in full News Corps' Weekly Operating Statement for a week ending 30 June 2013, as well as a number of articles referring to the contents of the Weekly Operating Statement.
“The disclosure of this document is entirely unauthorised, and News is taking the necessary and appropriate action against Crikey (including considering all available legal avenues).
“News will also take appropriate action against any other entity or individual who publishes the Weekly Operating Statement and/or its contents, including by referring to or summarising its contents.
Of course, the really amazing part in all of this is just how hypocritical News Corp. is in trying to suppress the leak. Others have pointed out that News Corp. has a history of doing exactly the sort of thing it's now complaining about:
Media academic Associate Professor David McKnight, who has authored a book about Mr Murdoch, says News Corp is being "extraordinarily hypocritical".And, in fact, another publication (part of Fairfax) notes that News Corp. has indeed done exactly that to Fairfax in the past:
"Coming from a media company that frequently publishes leaks, you really only have to imagine what News Corp would do if they had their hands on an equivalent document on Fairfax's internal operations, it would have been spread all over the front page with half a dozen gloating articles inside," he said.
"I can't imagine that News Corp would go ahead with the suggestion that there would be legal action, I mean it would just be the most extraordinary hypocrisy."
News Corp titles in the past have published the odd article based on internal Fairfax Media documents (not more than 20 or so in the last year). And nothing could be more scrupulous than their concern for the public good when The Australian published outdated salaries of senior ABC journalists.Oh, and that same report notes that News Corp.'s own reporters, in publishing the salaries of ABC journalists, had mocked them as "overpaid." But the internal report that Crikey published showed that not only is News Corp.'s The Australian losing a ton of money, its employees are paid even more than those ABC journalists.
And those ABC journalists are now having fun with this, highlighting a number of recent News Corp. stories that rely on leaked documents. Here are just a few:
Last month, The Advertiser obtained leaked documents ...And, of course, this effort to suppress the news has only drummed up that much more attention for just how poorly Murdoch's Australian news business is doing, increasing the length of the news cycle.
— The Advertiser, 25th February, 2014
The deal is outlined in a document obtained exclusively by The Daily Telegraph.
— The Daily Telegraph, 22nd July, 2013
The Weekend Australian can also reveal that a highly confidential report, prepared by global management consulting firm Bain & Company, recommends ruthless strategies to slash costs.
— The Australian, 10th May, 2014
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: australia, leaks, legal threats, rupert murdoch, the australian
Companies: news corp.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
If only there was a news corp tied production
My that would be grand.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Couldn't happen to a better outfit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Couldn't happen to a better outfit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Couldn't happen to a better outfit
It is not the reason that many liberals believe. We know this because the most outrageous stuff comes in from MSNBC and their ratings are horrible.
The reason is simply this. Conservatives are interested in news. Liberals on the other hand if they have any intreset at all in news it is the entertainment kind. Not political, business or world news.
So Fox, being of a more conservative slant gets many more people watching. The people who like MSNBC more than Fox are busy at the club or watching the Simpsons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Couldn't happen to a better outfit
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Couldn't happen to a better outfit
We really need user-customisable buttons.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It is getting more and more difficult not to call them people. Media organisations are people too!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
At least it is better than the Fin Review for not making stuff up that it wishes were true.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Isn't identifying the bias part of the requirement of reading any news source? :-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pro Liberal Bias
In Australian politics, when one is referring to Liberals, one is referring the to Liberal/National Coalition, a conservative right of centre party, and our current government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Pro Liberal Bias
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
News Corporation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: News Corporation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]