In Case You Were Wondering: James Cameron Is Still Winning Cases Over Avatar

from the neverending-story dept

Fri, Sep 19th 2014 5:43pm — Timothy Geigner

The legacy of the movie Avatar was supposed to be about bringing the 3D movie era back. Or perhaps it was supposed to be strictly about box office numbers. It perhaps even should have been about James Cameron's place in the Hollywood pantheon. Too bad, then, that it's more likely the legacy of Avatar will be about just how many people attempted to sue claiming the movie copied everything from everyone ever.

Given that this has been going on for roughly half a decade, perhaps you thought the course had been run. You'd be wrong, as it was only recently that yet another lawsuit was dismissed over claims that the movie world of Pandora was copied from the artwork of William Roger Dean.

The defendants, including Cameron, Twentieth Century Fox, and Lightstorm Entertainment, moved to dismiss Dean's amended complaint, which a federal judge granted Wednesday. U.S. District Judge Jesse M. Furman called Dean's attempts to show substantial similarity between the works "plainly misguided."

"Many of the 'Avatar images' he includes are not from the film itself, but are taken from books about or derived from Avatar (including, for example, 'The Making of Avatar' and 'The Art of Avatar)," Furman wrote. "By plaintiff's own admission, those books are 'not part of the claims in this case.'"

It's an interesting strategy to sue someone for copying your work on the basis of images not from the movie you claim is infringing. Sort of like if I got mad at my brother for stealing my chicken wing and demonstrated the chicken wing's worth by pointing to a live chicken. Or something. Look, I don't know, but the misapplication of the works in question isn't even the point, because what Dean is suing over is essentially the concept of floating land masses in a fictional world, which is an idea, not a specific expression. Judge Furman noted as much when commenting on Dean's manipulation of the images in question.

Furman called several of Dean's claims "misguided," noting that as evidence, the artist included images from "books about or derived from Avatar" rather than the film. The judge also noted that images from the film were cropped, rotated and otherwise taken "out of context" in an attempt to make them look similar to Dean's paintings, which were in turn also manipulated by the artist.

Here's a nice little tip for any of you out there that might be considering filing this kind of lawsuit: if you have to twist and turn and crop and tweek every image on both sides of your copyright case, you're essentially disproving the infringement in the first place. Probably best to just not file the lawsuit and get back to making art, yes?

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: avatar, ideas, james cameron, lawsuits

17 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

S. T. Stone, 19 Sep 2014 @ 6:00pm

At least he's not suing Cameron over Avatar’s similarities to every other White Man’s Burden film.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Uriel-238 (profile), 19 Sep 2014 @ 6:17pm

I take this is about more than...
...newer expressions of the traditional mighty whitey story, a la Tarzan or The Last of the Mohicans, where white guy proves that he's better at being native than even the natives?

There are people who want to admit to having written such stories?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
jupiterkansas (profile), 19 Sep 2014 @ 6:23pm

Re: I take this is about more than...
Titanic: A movie about how some poor scamp is just as good as the wealthy passengers... in a movie that focuses almost exclusively on the wealthy passengers.

Cameron's not exactly subtle with his rich, white elitism. At least he has strong female characters.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2014 @ 6:38pm

Re: I take this is about more than...
This was just about the artistic depictions of certain elements of the alien world of Pandora. The story, cliche elements and all, is irrelevant to this lawsuit.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2014 @ 6:43pm

Another win for the idea/expression dichotomy. Even unoriginal hacks with $200 million+ production budgets get to reuse common cultural concepts without having to pay a fee to others who have likewise used those concepts.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Colin, 19 Sep 2014 @ 6:59pm

Avatar was not a very good movie at all. If I had written what it had ostensibly copied, I wouldn't go about publicizing that...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 19 Sep 2014 @ 8:12pm

In thinking more about this, I wonder if some of these "hey, they stole my ideas!" lawsuits start with a person who confuses copying in terms of copyright (i.e. making a copy of an exact expression) and the common usage of the term copying to denote "doing what someone else is doing."

Dean's arguments seem to amount to, "hey, I was the guy who was known for these fantastical album covers and they used similar fantastical elements in their movie. They copied me!"

If you draw a cat and start selling copies of that cat drawing, anyone else can also draw a cat and start selling copies of their cat drawings. Just because you draw a top hat on a cat doesn't mean other people can't draw a top hat on a cat too. You want to draw zombie cats or superhero cats or dog-cat hybrids? That's fine. You just can't copyright the idea of drawing those types of cats (or any other subject matter).

And if someone else draws the same concept as you, but does it better and sells more of it, you don't deserve a share of their profits just because you "drew it first."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
scotts13 (profile), 19 Sep 2014 @ 9:27pm

Honestly, though...
The whole movie DOES look like a Roger Dean illustration. Not that the resemblance is necessarily actionable, but even from the previews I wondered if Dean was involved.

Unsurprising, though - everything else in the film is borrowed, too.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
techflaws (profile), 19 Sep 2014 @ 9:58pm

Re: I take this is about more than...
Try the Smurf version of Pocahontas.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
techflaws (profile), 19 Sep 2014 @ 9:59pm

Re: Honestly, though...
So who really came up with the genious idea of having waterfalls (!) on flying rocks?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
David, 19 Sep 2014 @ 10:23pm

Now that you say it
"World consisting of flying rocks" reminds me of "The Shattered World" from Michael Reaves.

Except that it is a really good book rather than Pocahontas in blue. And there is a reason for the flying rocks other than "looks good in 3D", too. And it's part of the plot, too. You could not just swap it out for something else looking impressive.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 20 Sep 2014 @ 8:45am

Re:
"White Man’s Burden"

Oh - is this why many cringe at the mention of this movie?
And here I thought the movie was about how corporations don't give a shit about the environment or anyone who lives there.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Harold K, 21 Sep 2014 @ 9:29am

Turn about is fair play?
Since legacy entertainment has waged a war against all sorts of people and organizations protecting "its rights", and they have ended up with a permission culture which is stifeling creativity, does it now serve them right that they be sued by everyone whom they did not get permission from?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Marvin (profile), 21 Sep 2014 @ 11:40am

A little late for lawsuits
Gulliver went to the Island of Laputa. so should we see a Suit from Jonathan Swift to all parties for stealing the idea of floating rocks?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Anonymous Coward, 22 Sep 2014 @ 7:55am

Re: Re:
No you're thinking of Fern Gully.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Uriel-238 on a mobile device (profile), 23 Sep 2014 @ 8:04pm

New Sci-Fi story idea:
Tin Man's Burden

An all-purpose robot serving as am exploraton probe happens upon a younger civilization and outperforms them in every way possible.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Niall (profile), 24 Sep 2014 @ 4:43am

Re: New Sci-Fi story idea:
Wall-E!
[ link to this | view in thread ]