John Oliver Takes On The US Government's Legalized Theft Programs, Asset Seizure And Civil Asset Forfeiture
from the due-process?-never-heard-of-it dept
"Last Week Tonight's" John Oliver is again taking an entertaining swing at a subject that has made its way into Techdirt's pages: asset seizure and forfeiture. Going beyond the "robbery at badgepoint" (Cory Doctorow's term) to civil asset forfeiture (in which the government files suit against property that is presumed guilty of criminal ties), Oliver is his usual entertaining self while still managing to highlight the obscene depths these programs -- started with the intent of breaking up criminal enterprises and returning assets to those defrauded, etc. -- have sunk, thanks to the perversion of incentives.
The highlights are a law enforcement official sheepishly explaining (in a public hearing) that there is really no oversight or discretion involved in the spending of seized funds. (He flat out states that it's used to buy "toys" the department "needs.") This leads directly to a police department being called out by a citizen (in another public meeting) for purchasing booze and a margarita machine with seized funds.
Also fun (but in a rather twisted way) is the names of suits brought by the US against "guilty" property, including United States v. Article Consisting of 50,000 Cardboard Boxes More or Less, Each Containing One Pair of Clacker Balls. You can find several others simply by running a search at Justia. (This also happens at state level, so additional searching uncovers gems like this one: South Dakota vs. Fifteen Impounded Cats.)
Anything that brings more attention to this issue is welcome. Oliver's take allows for a rather painless digestion of the issue while still refusing to underplay how thoroughly corrupted the ideal has become, thanks mainly to policies that allow those seizing the property to directly benefit from the seizures. As to a solution, Oliver suggests two things: an overhaul of this system and rigorous oversight or (the easier route) changing TV procedurals to more accurately reflect law enforcement activities -- like the cuffing and frisking houses, furniture, etc.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: asset fofeiture, asset seizure, john oliver, law enforcement, legalized theft, us government
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Oliver is not just good, he's good for us.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
It's not Legal
Might as well just become a cop and start enjoying the power!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Just the right amount.
I consider them greater sources of news because unlike most of the other people in the journalist industry, they are not afraid to call out clear bullshit where they see it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I don't know when we've had this much cultural criticism distributed to such a mass audience before.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Comical Case Names
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
These protections were placed in the constitution because the founding fathers know, from experience and our knowledge of the history of various countries, what governments end up doing without these sorts of protections. They end up creating way too many laws so that you can't avoid breaking the law. They end up searching and confiscating your property without cause or accountability as to what happens to that property after it is confiscated. The property/proceeds ends up going into a 'black hole' where it effectively ends up in the pockets of various government officials/politicians.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Honestly, who read this and didn't have to laugh a bit?
Maybe someone should check the storage where they keep the confiscated drugs.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
but this is what the entire war on drugs creates. More laws that are potentially broken so there could be more reason to confiscate money/property. and now there is more fear of carrying money because it could be confiscated under the arbitrary suspicion of a law enforcement department that has a vested interest in taking your money.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
NSA = Terrorism
TSA = Terrorism
FBI = Terrorism
We don't need to go overseas to look for it , we have homegrown cells right here, cut off one head and there are many to take it's place .
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
South Dakota vs. Fifteen Impounded Cats?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Fight Fire With Fire
Better yet, grab the mayor's stuff, police chief's stuff, DA's stuff, etc. See how soon they yell for the forfeiture laws to be overturned.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Oliver is not just good, he's good for us.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Fight Fire With Fire
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: It's not Legal
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Just applied in the opposite direction. Instead of make believe rights for citizens its make believe powers for government!
Corrupt Demtards and corrupt Repukes... Like I always say... both are looking to push their beliefs on you and enslave you with them. The left does it through Secular Dogma and the right does it through Religious Dogma.
Both are pro big business!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
The people in power got wise... these foolish American will let us do anything to people they 'think' are bad. We can take control of them by making laws that target bad guys that just so happen to make it real easy for us to screw'em real good. All we have to do it just take it slow!
We didn't feel at thing! The police state is here, its not very bad because the police have in fact been more nice than mean with the enormous amount of power we just let them TAKE!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Fight Fire With Fire
So to be fair, seize the department's property on every complaint/lawsuit filed and don't return it unless and until the department is cleared of all wrongdoing after final appeals.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Now pick up that can!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Now it makes perfect sense!
And the evidence room is a prison... Whoa I just blew my own mind.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Epic usage of legally robbed money. We should all enlist to become cops :/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Oliver is not just good, he's good for us.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
If one is going to use baseball to speak of this:
In the case of last week they have the time to spend picking what ball they are going to attempt to hit then have the ability to observe the flight path of that ball, figure out at what speed and placement that bat needs to be to connect to the ball to make the home run.
And because we are using baseball - the time machine they have is mentioned in the title of the show "Last Week". Because of the time machine and ability to pick what ball they intend to strike means they look damn good when they take the swing.
Next up will be the web site dedicated to the Last Week drinking game where the next show's topic is guessed at along with the highpoints for that topic. After the C&D letter the site will be revamped and stop being called John's next week to A reason for College Kids to keep being drunk after the football games.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The real problem is that property is seized that is unrelated to the crime or, increasingly often, in the absence of a crime altogether.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
My friend up the road thinks that only a few corrupt cops do this and that they're swiftly dealt with. And if your money or car is ever taken, you just show up to court with the appropriate documentation and the court apologizes and hands your stuff back to you.
Of course he also thinks that if you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to fear from the police.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I'm not familiar with the police in Canada, but the stereotype is that Canadian cops are much more competent and honest than US cops.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
As a necessary tool to fight the illicit drug trade sweeping the country at the time, we were all promised that Civil forfeiture would only ever be used against them, not us.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Yep, I remember that. I also remember some other things:
When seat belt laws were introduced, we were promised that failure to wear a seat belt would never be the reason you got pulled over, it would just be an "add-on" ticket if you were being cited for something else.
When the Taser was introduced, we were promised that it would only be used in cases where a gun would otherwise have been needed. It would never be used as the go-to tool for "enforcing compliance" or to torture.
When police policies that it's OK to search cell phones came about, we were told that this power would never be used only in specific circumstances, not used to copy the information from everybody that the police detain.
I can go on and on and on with examples like this. This is one of the biggest examples of why we should be extremely cautious about giving the police any additional powers whatsoever.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I can understand him, and I don't have much faith in the democrats doing real good in mid-terms, only old people vote in mid terms, so that means mostly incumbents staying where they are and more taking over of Congress, and god help us, if the Republicans take the Senate, I hope Obama will write 10 Executive Orders a day. Not that I like him particularly, but he's better than this "let's-block-all-of-Obama's-ideas" congress (that's not even pushing it, it IS their official policy, Boehner was going to agree with Obama on Immigration Reform, said he would after Obama spoke of it a couple hours later. The next day the batshit tea partiers forced his hand and he said the complete opposite and that he won't work with this President.
I mean ffs, the US is in decline, a decline so massive it's hard to do nothing but laugh about it. Russia has more of a good looking future (if the NATO doesn't start a war with it, which I repeat, is official policy, the coup d'état orchestrated in Washington in Ukraine to topple a democratically elected leader supporting protesters who armed themselves with molotov cocktails and GUNS to confront a riot control police told to STAND DOWN and not to shoot at the protesters with live ammunition. And using neo-nazis that worship the nazi collaborator of occupied Nazi Ukraine back in ww2, (Bandor? or something, forgot the name) is just to provoke russia, and Russia said fine, but we're taking back what was always part of Russia, Crimea. Afterall, a non existing country (USSR) gave the Ukraine SSR Crimea in the 50's...
The whole Bush policy of encircling Russia with missile shields to protect Europe and Israel from "Iran"....yeah right, it's to protect against Russian retaliation in case NATO decides to take down the current or close future leaders of Russia and bring it in the Globalization Crew or else...Then people suspect Russia shot down the Polish flight that contained the majority of the Polish government flying to Moscow to talk, after Poland signed a treaty with the US to install anti-missile shields there. Putin was going to punish Poland one way or another (Poland is the country right now that's the most active in pushing for crazy policies regarding Russia.
Case in point, everything Obama spoke of in 2008 to become President was all bullshit, his own parties' congress didn't undo the Bush policies that are bringing humanity close to a precipice it will never be able to climb out of.
Funny how in 2005 I decided to watch CNN kinda late at night (around 11h30 pm) and Anderson Cooper was interviewing this brand new senator from the 2004 elections and saying how he could be the first black president! And no matter how Obama tried to play down the Coop's flattery, it's about when he became the media darling, well on CNN...we get this one on basic cable in Canada, but i'm sure msnbc did interviews with him early on. I'm starting to believe that Presidents are chosen in advance...the Law was twisted and stopped being applied to let Bush win in 2000 and voting machines made by Diebold were rigged to make Bush win....Diebold is based in Ohio, search the internet for something like Diebold CEO is dedicated to giving Bush the presidency in 2004....he literally said that at a republican convention where he was invited.
They're comedians with a lot of knowledge we don't know about. John Oliver is foreign so he has even less problems with discussing serious shit like this.Cops stealing people's money for no valid reason...and some people doubt Cops are the largest organized crime organization in the world...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
That doesn't explain the attitude of my friend who lives up the road and who has lived his entire life in the U.S.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Fight Fire With Fire
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2048105/force-youtube-to-buffer-your-entire-video.html
I got a 90mbps connection and I still bother doing this, also Adblock Edge...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
It's sort of a "filter-the-retards" kind of thing, it happens in most college programs, but normally it's in the 4th semester where classes unrelated to what you are studying but forced to take, can take you down/slow down your progress, not including all the mandatory Philosophy(3), English (2 or 4), French(2 or 4) and Phys Ed(3) and those unrelated classes (2).
That stuff managed to slow me down too, had great difficulty beating French II and III and I'm half english, half-french, had no problems with the unrelated to your program classes or phys ed, you have a large list and make a top 3 of what you would want to be in.
I think the mandatory Philosophy and Maths gives us better cops, but that doesn't mean they can't get crooked along the way.
Oh and I'm speaking of guys who want to be municipal or Provincial (like state troopers) cops....and only the important provinces have Provincial Cops, the rest of Canada is ruled over by the Mounties, and you only need a high school diploma and to pass their academia to get in...that's why I hate the prairies, idiots who are forcing the abomination called Harper on the rest of us all.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Government Theft and crimes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Seizures
Government (state and federal) are required to send written notice to interested parties, such notice shall be sent in a manner of no more than 60 days after the date of seizure.
If before the 60 days period expires the Government does not file a civil judicial forfeiture action but does obtain a criminal indictment containing an allegation that the property is subject to forfeiture.
**If the government does not send a notice of seizure of property in accordance with a 60 day notice and no extension of time has been granted the government shall return all properties
to that person without prejudice to the right of the government not to commerce a forfeiture proceeding at a later day.
Burden of Proof
In a suit or action brought under any civil forfeiture statute for the civil forfeiture of any any property
*The burden of proof is on the government to establish by a PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE that the property is subject to forfeiture.
If the court finds that the forfeiture is grossly disproportion to the offense it shall reduce or climate the forfeiture as necessary to a avoid a
VIOLATION OF THE EXCESSIVE SEIZURE CLAUSE OF THR 8 TH AMENDANT OF THE CONSTITUTION.
[ link to this | view in thread ]