Privacy International Files Criminal Complaint Against FinFisher Spyware Company
from the accessories-and-abettors dept
Techdirt has been reporting on the disturbing rise in the use of malware by governments around the world to spy on citizens. One name that keeps cropping up in this context is the FinFisher suite of spyware products from the British company Gamma. Its code was discovered masquerading as a Malay-language version of Mozilla Firefox, and is now at the center of a complaint filed in the UK:
Privacy International today has made a criminal complaint to the National Cyber Crime Unit of the National Crime Agency, urging the immediate investigation of the unlawful surveillance of three Bahraini activists living in the UK by Bahraini authorities using the intrusive malware FinFisher supplied by British company Gamma.
Here's why Privacy International is acting now:
While it's long been known that Gamma has provided surveillance capabilities to Bahrain, amongst other countries, the extent of Gamma's complicity in Bahrain's unlawful surveillance of individuals located abroad has only recently been confirmed. Two months ago, a number of internal Gamma documents were published revealing that Gamma is both aware of, and actively facilitating, the Bahraini regime's surveillance of targets located outside Bahrain through the provision of intrusion technology called FinFisher to the Bahraini authorities.
Privacy International believes that this alleged surveillance of Bahraini activists while in the UK constitutes an unlawful interception of communications under the UK's Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 -- the infamous RIPA -- and further argues that Gamma is "liable as an accessory under the Accessories and Abettors Act 1861 and/or encouraged and assisted the offence under the Serious Crime Act 2007." If this reasoning is accepted, it could create an important precedent, at least in the UK.
The analysis by Bahrain Watch clearly shows that, amongst the Gamma documents published online, those targeted by the Bahraini government with FinFisher technology were [the activists] Mohammed, Jaafar, and Saeed, along with prominent Bahraini opposition politicians, democracy activists and human rights lawyers.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: activists, bahrain, finfisher, human rights, privacy, surveillance
Companies: gamma, privacy international
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Mwah, ha, ha, ha, haaaa!
Watson, the game's afoot!
How could FinFisher think this was a good thing for the company to be involved in? I hope the owner goes to "gaol" for this "indiscretion" on their part. fsckin' idiots. Rot in "some very uncomfortable (cold, dark, dangerous) prison" until you scream for mercy.
"Brits" ought to know better. Yes, I hold them to a higher standard than others! They've trumpeted their superiority since the Magna Carta, yet look at them today. Disgusting.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
here's hoping!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
'If this reasoning is accepted, it could create an important precedent, at least in the UK'
Of course, it is better to have the authorities act on the complaint, rather than initiating a private prosecution, but if not accepted, Privacy International should hire a good lawyer and get started.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Disappear for a month and re-appear as Epsilon Inc.
Yep. That should do it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]