Consumer Organizations And Internet Companies Mount Legal Challenge To Italy's Extreme Copyright Enforcement Regulations
from the fightback-time dept
Techdirt has been following for a while the saga of Italy giving its Authority for Communications Guarantees (AGCOM), which regulates broadcasting and telecommunications, wide-ranging new powers to police online copyright infringement too. That culminated in the first instances of Web sites being blocked without any kind of judicial review earlier this year. Since then, there has been an important development as civil organizations and Internet companies have mounted a legal challenge to the new regulations. One of the lawyers involved in these actions, Fulvio Sarzana, explains what happened:
On 26 September 2014, The Italian regional administrative tribunal referred the question regarding the constitutionality of the administrative enforcement procedures foreseen by a new regulation on online copyright infringement to the Italian Constitutional Court.
Here's why:
the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio required the Constitutional Court to issued its judgment, since it held that the regulation might be unconstitutional, for violation of the principles of statute and judicial protection in relation to the exercise of freedom of expression and economic initiative, as well as for the violation of criteria of reasonableness and proportionality in the exercise of legislative discretion and of the principle of the court, in relation to the lack of guarantees and legal safeguards for the exercise of freedom of expression on the Internet.
Given that the constitutionality of the copyright regulations is in question, consumer and business organizations -- Altroconsumo, Movimento di difesa del Cittadino and Assoprovider -- have sent a formal request to AGCOM asking for the whole approach to be suspended until a decision is handed down. They argue that this is necessary in order to avoid the high costs that AGCOM would incur from being sued by those who have had their sites shut down, in the event that the regulations are found unconstitutional (original in Italian.)
AGCOM has refused to suspend the regulations completely, but it has slowed down the pace of its actions, as Sarzana notes:
in October 2014, the President of Agcom, Mr. Angelo Cardani, indicated that Agcom shall proceed "with caution" , addressing only cases "of real urgency", pending the case in the Constitutional Court.
Although hardly satisfactory, that does show that even AGCOM realizes that there is a possibility its days of unbridled power to censor sites are numbered. Let's hope so.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: agcom, constitutionality, copyright, enforcement, italy, legal challenge
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Before the trolls arrive with their misdirection, I'd just like to note that it's the second part of this sentence that most people have problems with, not necessarily the first (although many of us also think that's still not the right solution).
Without name-calling, lying or distorting the facts, I wonder if any of the "other side" of this argument are yet capable of arguing otherwise. I'm yet to see such a defence.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The problem with seeking alternative business models for artists and creators to make money from their work is that we don't get a share of it. This sad and sorry state of affairs leaves us with little choice, then, but to block those websites that we even imagine might possibly be shamelessly stealing potential revenues from us.
A little sympathy for us devils, please. Imagine a world in which nobody ever makes content again for fear that someone else will use it to make money for themselves. It's coming, pirates, and you're making it happen. If I can just convince enough people to believe this, I can continue my rent-seeking in peace without being criticized for it on websites like Techdirt.
Ask before sharing this post. It's copyright, you know.
/sarc
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
albüm dinle
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: albüm dinle
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
While it would be political suicide to directly destroy the Internet, politicians are, or should be, well aware that it challenges their power by allowing citizens to self organize without the need for those parasitic classes, the politicians, and government bureaucracies.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Here's an idea
[ link to this | view in chronology ]