Boycott Called Against Spanish Newspaper Publishers' Association Titles In Protest Of New Copyright Law
from the defending-the-glue dept
Last week we reported on the Spanish newspaper publishers' association (AEDE) begging the Spanish government and EU to stop Google News shutting down as it realizes how much its members depend on Google for traffic to newspaper sites. To bring home just how stupid the new Spanish copyright law is, the online site Hipertextual.com is now calling for a boycott of all titles owned by AEDE (original in Spanish):
Are you too against the new copyright law and the AEDE tax on media and aggregators? The first step you can take right now is to begin a boycott of AEDE titles: don't visit them, don't link to them, don't give them traffic or relevance.
The Hipertextual.com article also recommends installing add-ons for the Chrome and Firefox browsers that automatically block all links to AEDE titles, and provides lists of international, national and regional alternatives.
Even if it is well supported, the boycott on its own probably wouldn't have much effect, but combined with the devastating loss of traffic that Google News closing will cause, it will certainly add to the pressure on the AEDE publishers. Just as importantly, it will also show that whatever the Spanish government may think, the country's new copyright law is not just about squeezing money from a rich US company, but also represents a serious threat to the basic glue that holds the Web together -- the hypertext link.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: boycott, google news, publishers, spain
Companies: aede
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Dumbfucks.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Uh, quite the boycott...
You are not allowed to do that without recompensation anyway. That's the whole point of the law.
Consequently, only websites of newspaper household names will get visitors.
That was the main point of pushing through this law: giving the big established players a leg up against the comeuppancy by turning the clock back 40 years for everyone.
Unfortunately, only in Spain. I foresee a boom in foreign language proficiency for people from Spain since news from Latin America is at best going to be moderately interesting for Spanish speakers.
It will be strike against Catalan, however, since Catalan is not really spoken much outside of Spain.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The publishers are claiming, with some right, that Google is eating a lot of their advertisement income from both being a search engine, but just as much from its heavy seat as advertisement agency leader. That is a big part of the blame GOOG campaigns - the interruption/shortcirquiting of their monopoly gig on providing advertisement. Advertisement has been heavily local driven in the past and the economy has therefore been taxed locally, so the internationalisation is hurting countries with too heavily an entrenched system since the outside competition will be a disruptive "innovation".
The law in Spain is a symptom of the conservative regressive thought of economic protectionism. While "protectionism" in a very broad sense is not bad in every issue, think ISDS, the chosen strategy seems like what it is: An emu hiding its head in the sand and thereafter thinking it is invisible...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not only that, but AEDE's instance that Spain authorities intervene and stop Google News from closing is also outside the purview of Spanish legislators or the government. Just like "The Independent" called it, it's not Google's responsibility to save the Spanish news media just as it's not the responsibility of Spanish authorities to force Google to continue operating in their country.
Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/its-not-googles-business-to-save-the-newspaper-industry- in-spain-or-anywhere-else-9928417.html
If the AEDE hadn't been so gung-ho about this new copyright law, this would never have gotten this far. One important view that techdirt never included in its article, and it took a lot of hard digging to find this information, that AEDE capitulated to the Spanish government in order to get their copyright law passed.
Apparently, Spanish authorities weren't happy about all of the negative press the government had been receiving from the Spanish media of late. Lawmakers agreed to give the AEDE their draconian copyright law if news publishers toned their criticism of the government down. When Spanish news publishers agreed, they gave the news media their restrictive copyright law. The corruption of the Spanish government was now applied to the Spanish news media who started publishing good news stories about the Spanish government and stopped publishing negative news articles about the government.
I don't remember what news publisher I saw the article on but I'll try to find it. But, Spain didn't agree to the new copyright law until the news publishers started falling in line with the Spanish government. This is the intended result.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
To find objective facts and useful assessments, AEDE has forced Spanish readers to start looking elsewhere. By trading favors with government officials, they have removed themselves as credible sources of information.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
So they're following the US model, then.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Backwards
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Do you now understand why AEDE has bargained with their politicians to put a stop to the availability of a simple Google search for the sake of looking elsewhere?
The law is working as intended. AEDE promises not to provide facts casting a bad light on politicians, and the politicians make sure that people won't find that information elsewhere easily.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lame joking aside, i do think, for boycotting, add ons but not limited is a fantastic idea
[ link to this | view in thread ]
From what I had read, and I wish I had saved the link, Spain's news publishers had been hammering Spain's government of late and the bad press regarding the government corruption was taking its toll. They wanted the news media to fall in line and to stop the negative reporting. That's when this Faustian deal was struck and the media stopped their negative reporting, just like we have seen over the past six years in regards to Democrats and President Obama here in the United States.
AEDE got their Christmas wish and Spain intervened on AEDE's behalf and passed that law. However, Google called their bluff and shut down Google news and blacklisted news publishers from the Google News service. The AEDE certainly has some big balls to demand Spain intervene, AGAIN, and stop Google's withdrawal. But, one thing that got me to thinking, is that Google probably wasn't even hosting the servers to Google News (Spain) in the country itself. They probably just had the domain name registered with a Spanish registrar.
AEDE should have realized that Google would not capitulate to AEDE like the AEDE capitulated to Spain's government.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
AEDE members have made themselves harder to find. Their goal of killing smaller local competition might initially improve AEDE numbers with diverted readers --- but only if this is not offset by the loss of their own readers. Otherwise, it is a net, possibly permanent, loss for the AEDE, which should become apparent to them very soon.
The corrupt politicians do appear to be seeking to suppress information on corruption published by now-more-compliant AEDE members. They haven't thought this through, either. Since this move is so obvious, many Spanish readers seeking accurate information will learn to find it anywhere except in the AEDE newspapers. This may cause a rebound to the smaller newspapers within Spain. The news suppression will also encourage permanent sources outside Spain that will be much less likely to trade favors with corrupt politicians.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
To complement this, there is currently a law being passed that makes it illegal to organize protests in the Internet or post unsettling information about the government.
Google is just collateral. What this is about is preventing politically competent and educated citizens.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
If that's what they wanted, they would have taken the trivial step necessary to prevent Google from indexing their sites. They don't even need to talk to Google to do this.
[ link to this | view in thread ]