Judge Tries To Gag Reporters Covering Court Case, Gets Ignored
from the shut-up,-he-ineffectually-demanded dept
Prior restraint much? (via Jim Romenesko)
Anthony J. Sineni III, 52, of Standish sought to restrict media coverage of the case against him in the Cumberland County Courthouse in Portland and persuaded a judge to order the media not to report what he or any witnesses said in court.How a judge arrived at the conclusion that he could violate the First Amendment rights of these reporters is unexplained. (Perhaps he'll explain it during the special hearing he's called for Wednesday, involving the paper and its lawyers.) It simply is. Sineni -- facing charges related to a domestic violence case -- asked and received. Except that his granted request was ultimately futile. The Portland Press Herald seems to have a better grasp on the First Amendment than Judge Moskowitz does.
Judge Jeffrey Moskowitz, the deputy chief of the state’s district court, told members of the media as the hearing began what they could and could not report.
A reporter for the Portland Press Herald protested the order and asked for time to contact legal counsel. Moskowitz denied the request and said the hearing would proceed without delay, declaring that anyone who did not agree to comply with his order to report only what the prosecutor and Sineni’s attorney said would be ejected from the courtroom.
An attorney for the Portland Press Herald, Sigmund Schutz, said Monday evening that the judge’s order to the media was a clear violation of the public’s First Amendment constitutional right of free speech.Sineni, however, appears to believe little things like the First Amendment don't apply to him or his case. He also seems to feel laws of all types are for other people, according to testimony delivered by his ex-girlfriend (Winona Hichborn) -- the same testimony the Press Herald was ordered not to report on.
“There is a 100 percent chance that the order is unlawful,” Schutz said. “I think there is no question that the U.S. Supreme Court and other courts have been very clear, what occurs or is said in the court is a matter of public record.”
“Tony (Sineni) told me before that he is above the law and that if he gets away with this they won’t be able to touch him,” Hichborn testified, flanked by her attorney and a victim-witness advocate.So, it appears Sineni is every bit as wrong as Judge Moskowitz is. Sineni pled no contest but conceded there was enough evidence find him guilty on two of the charges. The law appears to be pulling level with Sineni's cruising altitude. And the ruling issued by Moskowitz has been treated as though he had never bothered wasting his breath uttering the unlawful order in the first place. Good for the Press Herald, which had the insight and fortitude to call BS and do what it was supposed to be doing in the first place: reporting on events that occurred in a public forum.
And as for Sineni, he has hopefully learned that trying to shut people up only makes them speak more loudly -- and that raised voice tends to create plenty of echoes. What would have just been a local interest story is now spreading nationally, and that won't be doing any favors for Sineni's reputation -- or Judge Moskowitz's.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: anthony sineni, anthony sineni iii, first amendment, free speech, jeffrey moskowitz, portland, portland press herlad, prior restraint
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
It was this, according to the paper:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is it?
Some, well many, of our public figures are channeling, well something.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Former Client
I get screwed, and he gets to play God?? He gets to walk?? He gets to call the shots??? SCREW HIM!!!!
And the Judge, too...who I heard is one of the dumbest judges in the State of Maine, and almost every one of his rulings is appealed. GREAT JUSTICE SYSTEM MAINE HAS!!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is not rocket science
Good for our local paper. They're always on the side of freedom of the press, unlike some so-called legal experts.
Both of whom should be removed from the practice of law, forthwith.
However, remember, this is state court, not Federal, where they would not dare to even think of such a stupid bone-ass move.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The vast majority of judges achieve that by being above contempt. Occasionally one will succeed by being beneath it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dalton v Dalton
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dalton v Dalton
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What's the proper term for when two judges try to cover for each other. It's called the "blue line" for police because they wear blue uniforms. Judges wear black robes, so I'm going to call it the "black line".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You might want to change to internationally, since I'm reading this in Ireland.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is this the same U.S. Supreme Court that bans all recording devices from their proceedings?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
No, the one that permits audio recordings (but not video for some reason).
And BTW this is Portland, Maine, which was never mentioned in the post.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Now what does he know having fisrt hand experience with that system that makes him say something we strongly suspect is the case in many "laws"......how many tony's out there at what levels dictating an entire nation....."legally"
Yeah we so live in the best civilised corruptions, civily......thats what makes it alright for "us"........apparently
Winning
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Even if that is all true, it has no bearing on the 1st Amendment rights of the newspaper.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I don't know what event you're referring to, but they have a right to make whatever judgments they want.
Or is this called yellow journalism or editorializing or even libel?
The first two are a matter of opinion. I certainly don't see anything in the article that I would characterize in those ways. As for libel, I can't even guess what statements from the article you could consider libelous. The article is here:
http://www.pressherald.com/2015/01/05/well-known-lawyer-from-standish-convicted-of-assault-diso rderly-conduct/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I worked for a newspaper and as a result try not to read them anymore. No wonder they are in bad shape.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I honestly don't know what you're referring to you when you said "Did the newspaper really have a right to judge why this happened". I don't know what the "this" is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Asking you to explain something you said makes me closed minded? Wow.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]