DA Charges Albuquerque Cops With Murder, Gets Locked Out Of New Police Shooting Investigation
from the not-every-killing-is-justifiable dept
Given what has happened in recent months, with two grand juries returning no bills in two controversial officer-related deaths -- Michael Brown in Ferguson, MO and Eric Garner in New York City -- it's almost unbelievable to read the following:
The district attorney in Albuquerque has charged two police officers on single counts of open murder—meaning they don't know yet what degree of killing the state intends to prove at trial—in connection with the killing of homeless camper James Boyd, caught on body camera last April.The incident was captured on officers' body cams. What started out as a homeless man (James Boyd) being rousted for illegal camping "escalated" into him being shot multiple times and dying at the scene. "Escalated" is in quotes because the man had agreed to surrender to the Albuquerque police officers, who for whatever reason decided to release a dog, hit him with a concussion grenade and then fire several bullets at him.
The officers who shot him (Dominique Perez and Keith Sandy -- the latter of which was allowed to retire after the incident) claimed they were forced to because the man produced two knives.
In a statement sent Monday morning, Sandy's attorney Sam Bregman claimed the charges are unjustified and that Sandy, "had not only the right, but the duty to defend a fellow officer from a mentally unstable, violent man wielding two knives. Keith did nothing wrong. To the contrary, he followed his training and probably saved his fellow officer's life." Bregman did not specify which of the four other officers who were confronting Boyd at the end of a four-hour standoff was saved.Of course, the threat Boyd presented was also 20-30 feet away uphill and the officers had no shortage of non-lethal options at their disposal. But they chose to take the "hail of bullets" route, killing Boyd essentially for camping without a permit.
The attorney for Perez, Luis Robles, also pointed to the judgement calls police officers make during critical moments. He told News 13 in a statement, "This is truly a shame. Throughout his career, Officer Perez has been called upon to make life-altering decisions while protecting Albuquerque citizens and his fellow officers. And having made one of those decisions, Officer Perez now faces an open count of murder. Regardless, I am confident that the facts will vindicate Officer Perez's actions in this case."
Being charged with murder is going to cut into former Detective Sandy's free time. His fortuitious retirement allowed him to bypass internal accountability as well as ensuring a steady income for the rest of his life.
News 13 has learned Sandy had accrued just shy of 19 years service credit from his time with both NMSP and APD. Under his pension plan, he’s allowed to buy up to a year of “airtime” that adds to that service time. That allows Sandy to get to a magic number, 20 years of service credit.The DA's unusual move hasn't made here any friends within the Albuquerque PD (which was recently slammed by the DOJ for its habitual use of excessive force). Kari Brandenburg -- and her office -- are now persona non grata at the PD.
After 20 years of service, APD officers can retire and get about 70 percent of their pay in an annual pension. A year less, and Sandy would have to wait until he’s 61 to start collecting that money, likely costing him at least a million dollars.
News 13 has also learned Sandy had recently been ordered to sit down with internal affairs investigators. Retiring allows him to avoid that interview.
A top prosecutor for District Attorney Kari Brandenburg’s office was shut out of a briefing after a fatal police shooting near San Mateo and Constitution NE on Tuesday evening, Brandenburg told KRQE News 13.At least the PD was upfront about why it was suddenly locking out its former best friends.
Police officials and others were gathering to discuss the most recent developments in the investigation a few hours after the shooting, Brandenburg said. Chief Deputy DA Sylvia Martinez attempted to join the briefing, but Deputy City Attorney Kathryn Levy would not let Martinez attend.
Levy invoked the charges in barring Martinez from the briefing, according to Brandenburg.This frosty move violates 2004 written agreement between the PD and DA's office on the investigation of police shootings -- one that was included as part of the reforms handed down by the DOJ after its 18-month investigation. But that's what happens to anyone who doesn't treat cops as above reproach (or punishment), even entities that are nominally on the "same team," like prosecutors.
“Sylvia was told that our office has a conflict of interest because we charged the officers,” she said.
Notably, it's an open murder charge, meaning there's lots of leeway for the defense. It will also be a tough sell. The prosecutors will need to prove that the officers deliberately acted to end James Boyd's life, as well as surmount the additional protections afforded officers who kill citizens in the line of duty. New Mexico does have a grand jury process so it's notable that it has been bypassed for these charges. The DA's office claims to have seen something in the evidence that led it to move forward with murder charges, and it possibly felt that dumping into a grand jury's hands would either be unpopular or less likely to result in an indictment. Either way, it seems to indicate the DA's office knows how screwed up the grand jury system is, what with its "ham sandwich, unless it's a police officer" track record.
Whatever's contained in that evidence must be pretty damning. DA's offices are rarely interested in prosecuting police officers since they're both on the law enforcement side of the equation. No doubt the noticeable drop in cooperation from law enforcement, should they move forward with charges, factors into the rarity of these situations as well.
While it would be tempting to see that as an indicator that more accountability is on the way, it's far more likely that this will remain the exception to rule. But it is good to see someone attacking the argument that officer safety is paramount, even if from an oblique angle. Calling Boyd's shooting "murder" makes the statement that the cops who shot him had no interest in simply neutralizing the threat. Instead, they opened fire and kept firing until Boyd was dead.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: albuquerque, investigation, james boyd, police
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
It would seem more than ever that Law Enforcement agencies from the federal, to the state, to the cities and towns feel empowered to break any laws they see fir with impunity and there will be no consequences at all to them.
And Law enforcement say's it is the citizens who are out of control and have no respect for them. I disagree, it is law enforcement who have no respect for the citizens nor the laws they swore and oath to uphold.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
A few details
After having felled the camper, the shooter announced "booyah!" on the recording.
The lethal bullets were fired into the back of the camper, faced away from the policemen and having yielded. After the camper was dead, the policemen perfunctorily engaged the non-lethal subduement options (beanbags and a dog) on the corpse, presumably in order to claim that they had been tried first. No attempt to administer medical aid was performed.
It is really appalling that the camera coverage was not properly deleted and the District Attorney bypassed the regular procedures for diverting accountability.
It's going to look really bad to sweep this under the rug now and so I fully expect that this District Attorney can kiss his career prospects goodbye.
That is the one thing I feel reasonably confident about in the light of the available evidence and the U.S. justice system's track record.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DOJ???????
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This shit is why people don't respect cops anymore
And then we get things like locking the DA out for daring to do their job and charge some cops with murder. That's just being childish and petulant. In a sane world they'd be fired for refusing to do part of their job.
I respect this DA though for being willing to do their job even though they had to know the cops would react like spoiled toddlers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I counted 7 shots
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Time for some serious thought about ending police unions and letting each cop hold his job independently under civilian control. Maybe then the mythical "good cops" will make themselves known and start helping weed out the "bad apples".
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Right...because if that is the standard then the DA *always* has a conflict of interest when prosecuting civilians, because she's prosecuted civilians in the past. Of course this logic when used consistently also means that cops have a conflict of interest because they've let cops *off* in the past - but, of course, cop logic only works one way, in their favor.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
From what I've seen, they usually are.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This shit is why people don't respect cops anymore
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Probably" sounds a lot like "maybe" which opens the way for a trial. Maybe he was right but maybe he wasn't, let the jury decide. If they decide it was justified to shoot a guy wielding two knifes who was standing some feet away while being threatend by a dog and various guns then so be it but in my opinion that question must be allowed first. And the best way to answer the question is in a trial where everyone has to lay out the facts.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This shit is why people don't respect cops anymore
If it were just that then I'd say ok but they go a step further. Instead of just saying "respect my authority" they threaten you with physical harm or death aka "don't make me feel threatend". The worst part is that they act this way all around the world.
I got stopped by a boarder patrol on the swiss-german boarder and while they were searching me I asked if I should be of help and open a pocket (the officer had trouble to open it) in a very friendly way "may I help you opening that pocket?". The response of his partner was "shut up, do what my partner says or I will beat the shit out of you" How can anyone respect people that act this way?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
thats the way to teach em to be homeless
wow what a sick bunch a pigs
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No one's loved ones are safe anymore. To see it in play look at NYC, where cops are throwing a temper tantrum over the mayor's supposedly agenda of being against them.
I feel that much of this nation's problems have their roots in corporate oligarchy. We seem to be running head long into the fascist state as fast as our government can take us. Cops will soon be known by some silly name such as Homeland Defenders or some such nonsense.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
less than lethal force
[ link to this | view in thread ]
>_
The National Guard will be needed to disband that department.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That way, anyone who tries to interfere with the DA can then be arrested and charged with obstruction, (even when the APD refuse to do it themselves).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Boyd did not die at the scene
http://www.scribd.com/doc/227095626/Boyd-Autopsy
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: DOJ???????
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: A few details
And that isn't good for public relations.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Boyd did not die at the scene
After further reading. I discovered that Boyd was actually shot in the back 6 times with assault rifles when he turned away from the officers. Then Boyd is heard pleading, “Please don’t hurt me anymore. I can’t move,”.
It appears at that point, some of the bullets hit Boyd's spinal cord and he was paralyzed. That's why he didn't flinch when the dog thrashing him and shotgun rounds were hitting him.
It all makes sense now how he could remain perfectly still through all that.
http://www.abqjournal.com/524987/abqnewsseeker/da-to-seek-murder-charges-against-officers-in-james-b oyd-shooting.html
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Boyd did not die at the scene
Or did they actually manage to find an honest, unbiased coroner to do the autopsy for once?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
All the PD there is proving
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Boyd did not die at the scene
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Nope
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: A few details
You can either change your country or leave it.
"Oh, I'm not the target group" is not a choice. Once everyone else has been driven away or executed, you will be a target group.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
From the looks of it, the cams cleared the cops...
http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona/2015/01/13/records-flagstaff-officer-shot-s earched-suspect/21526819/
http://countercurrentnews.com/2015/01/the-man-responsible-for-the-dashcam-video-that-changed-everyth ing-has-been-executed/
So... for all the screaming about police, anyone here wants to be an officer of the law?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Don't misquote it, there is no such thing as a good cop. A cop who doesn't speak up when a bad cop does wrong is by default a bad cop as well. The bunch is spoiled. Time to shut down the entire system and start over with something new and 100% all new people.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Don't misquote it, there is no such thing as a good cop. A cop who doesn't speak up when a bad cop does wrong is by default a bad cop as well. The bunch is spoiled. Time to shut down the entire system and start over with something new and 100% all new people.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: From the looks of it, the cams cleared the cops...
No, because as soon as I started making a stink about other cops misbehaving, I'd be punished by the other officers. What would be the point?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: (pensions)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Boyd did not die at the scene
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: (pensions)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: From the looks of it, the cams cleared the cops...
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/10/the-police-are-still-out-of-control-112160. html
... but the issue remains, if change is to occur, who is going to do it?
For those that are reading this article and threaded discussion with the access to the data, I pose a question: What is the breakdown of those graduating with degrees in law enforcement - in terms of color and race?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: From the looks of it, the cams cleared the cops...
It can only be changed by the people themselves. Police officers in general are obviously unwilling to do it, and police administration appears to be even more unwilling.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: From the looks of it, the cams cleared the cops...
http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/cfoi/cfch0012.pdf
http://www.nleomf.org/facts/officer-fatalities-dat a/causes.html
Since they have a lower fatality rate than a ton of other jobs, yeah sure I would except I'm not dumb enough. Nice of you to cite 2 extreme examples of something but that in no way makes it the norm. Meanwhile police brutality and questionable killing of suspects IS in fact the norm.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The solution is obvious...
Or theres the more classical method of slaying Martinez' family while they sleep and burning their house down. That should clarify to all what message that the APD is trying to say.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: From the looks of it, the cams cleared the cops...
http://www.policeone.com/police-jobs-and-careers/articles/7953294-Is-America-ready-for-the -true-cost-of-police-reform/
... but I do agree about change coming from very people that hire police to keep the streets safe. It is one the to whine about issues when voter turn out is less than 30%, it is another to expect change when voter turn out is above 85%.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The solution is obvious...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
History is full of...
And history is scant of examples of those willing to relinquish power voluntarily, without first bringing its full force to bear.
In this case, the APD is already behaving like a classic cadre of mobsters. Why not go the full monty?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: From the looks of it, the cams cleared the cops...
Care to try again?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: From the looks of it, the cams cleared the cops...
Then again it has always been amusing to me to watch people, who treat the places they live like 3rd world F-holes, complain that they were treated as living in a 3rd World F-Hole.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
murder
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Target group
But you can be "sophisticated about the details"
You can choose to be in the:
- stationary target group
- moving target group
- long range target group
- sign holding target group
- sleeping at home target group
and so on.
Don't come here and say you lack choice!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: From the looks of it, the cams cleared the cops...
While I admit I have no study to cite (I haven't looked), it seems obviously true to me. If it weren't true, then we would see good cops actually condemning bad cops rather than defending them.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: From the looks of it, the cams cleared the cops...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: History is full of...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: From the looks of it, the cams cleared the cops...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: From the looks of it, the cams cleared the cops...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: From the looks of it, the cams cleared the cops...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Kinda Joker / Comedian humor.
By alright if you mean morally acceptable to me personally? Of course not. I once believed we lived in a civilized society, and am rather outraged that injustice is prevalent.
If by alright you mean they could do it and contain the consequences so that no-one saw jailtime or even required a career change (other than the hapless DA). Likely, yes.
Regarding my original comment, my point was that under our prior, more nave pretenses, my suggestion would have been obviously a joke, and funny on account of it being outrageous. And in the current situation it's not, because that sort of thing might actually happen should individuals within our DoJ become more aware of the amount of latitude they have. J. Edgar Hoover might not kill a DA in open daylight, but he would arrange a hit by dark of night, and burn houses down to insure a message was sent.
So it's wasn't funny as an absurdist thing (which it should have been), but as a the sort of notion that's too close to truth to bear, so we can only laugh at it to stop ourselves from crying or quaking in our work shoes.
Of course, now I've explained the joke, which ruins the humor.
[ link to this | view in thread ]