Germany's Infamous Copyright Warning Letters May Be Reined In -- In A Few Years' Time

from the always-look-on-the-bright-side dept

Germany has figured on Techdirt on a number of occasions because of the widespread use of warning letters there, sent out in large numbers in connection with alleged copyright infringement, and usually including a demand for money. Back in April 2013, the German digital rights group Digitale Gesellschaft (Digiges) contacted the European Commission in order to draw its attention to the misuse of warning letters, which it said were in contravention of safeguards contained in the relevant European legislation. Here's the background, as explained by the digital rights association EDRi:

Digiges pointed out that in Germany, IPRED [the EU's Intellectual Property Enforcement Directive] had led to a situation which allowed rightsholders to acquire personal data of the users directly from the providers. All they needed for that was the IP-address of an alleged infringer and an application to a court that would order the provider to hand over the requested information. While this option was originally meant to facilitate the realisation of damages and injunctive relief, the whole process in fact became more and more automated over time. The requests from rightsholders usually comprised between 15 and 3 500 IP-addresses at a time. In one single case in October 2009, the number even reached a breathtaking 11 000. Given the fact that the court proceedings in these cases are always summary or expedited ones, it becomes clear that there is hardly any chance for a judge to thoroughly check the validity and accuracy of the "evidence" presented by the rightsholder.
In its letter, Digiges argued that the situation created by the German implementation of IPRED violates EU law, and asked the European Commission to do something about it. It did: in October 2013, it invited representatives to Brussels to explain their case further. After further correspondence with Digiges, more than one and a half years after the initial letter was sent, the Commission has finally decided to take the first step towards an infringement procedure against Germany:
The Commission officially prompted the German government to comment on the German situation around warning letters within ten weeks.
Heady stuff. EDRi points out that any practical effect of the Commission taking up this case is likely to be very slow to arrive:
The German government is expected to delay their answer to the Commission as long as possible. Once it has arrived, the Commission will have 10 weeks to evaluate the government’s reply. An ensuing judicial infringement procedure might take up to two years and will be repeated if the member state in question fails to comply with the ruling of the court.
So, realistically, we are looking at over four years before Germany actually has to do anything serious like changing its law here. But EDRi tries to look on the bright side, concluding its post as follows:
it is still unclear if and when Germany will change its laws facilitating the abuse of warning letters. But an important step towards the first infringement procedure with a net-political twist has been taken.
That's the spirit.

Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: copyright, copyright trolling, eu commission, extortion, germany, ipred, settlement letters, warning letters


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jan 2015 @ 1:59am

    Bawk bawk bawk!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    PaulT (profile), 23 Jan 2015 @ 2:28am

    Re:

    Huh, that was quick. I expected to be at least out of January before you got tired of fabricating strawmen to dismantle and returned to your animal impressions.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. icon
    That One Guy (profile), 23 Jan 2015 @ 3:52am

    Misplaced politeness

    The German government is expected to delay their answer to the Commission as long as possible. Once it has arrived, the Commission will have 10 weeks to evaluate the government’s reply. An ensuing judicial infringement procedure might take up to two years and will be repeated if the member state in question fails to comply with the ruling of the court.

    Ya gotta love the double standards here. I'm pretty sure if I received an order, or even request from a court, and I decided to put it off and/or ignore it, the court would be rather firm with me(to put it lightly), and almost certainly wouldn't give me a second chance unless I provided a damn good reason for my failure to comply.

    Here, the German government is not only expected to drag their feet the whole way, but they'll even apparently get several chances to comply, with, unless I missed something, absolutely zero penalty if they decide not to do so.

    Oh yes, all the parties involved are ever so interested in tackling this problem in a timely manner, and ensuring that more innocent people aren't thrown into the meat-grinder of copyright extortion. /s

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jan 2015 @ 3:53am

    Someone needs to sue Google. I don't know why. It just feels like the right thing to do in this situation.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. icon
    That One Guy (profile), 23 Jan 2015 @ 3:54am

    Re: Re:

    I wonder if he thinks TD is a digital farm? I mean, first he provides the strawmen, then he provides the 'animals', maybe he's just pretending to be a farmer as best he can?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    PaulT (profile), 23 Jan 2015 @ 4:41am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Don't forget the manure he spreads as thickly as possible. You may be on to something!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jan 2015 @ 6:57am

    Re:

    average_joe just hates it when due process is enforced.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jan 2015 @ 7:08am

    Re:

    Well, Germany should sue Google for defamation. After all, I can find articles like this one through Google. It's all Google's fault, clearly.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 23 Jan 2015 @ 5:57pm

    Meh...

    Those letters have become very common here in Germany. If you get one of those then you Google a few mins and find various versions of preprinted letters that you can send back. They give or take all include that you dont pay anything but wont do it again.

    I myself got one of those letters saying I downloaded a movie via torrent and they wanted some hundred Euro. I never use torrent so I just wrote back that it wasn't me and asked in detail how they came to the conclusion that the IP belonged to me at the time and how they found that IP in the first place. Never heard of them again (the way they find IPs is a company secret so they cant tell).

    On the other hand in one case a law firm(in the name of a copyright holder) sent out letters because people allegedly watched copyrighted pron. That lawyer now lost his license and further legal actions are on the way.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. icon
    That Anonymous Coward (profile), 23 Jan 2015 @ 6:17pm

    Isn't copyright wonderful?
    Giving them this unfettered access has totally crushed copyright infringement and lead to a golden age of German film & culture.
    Oh wait...

    Secret systems given the power to act as judge, jury, debt collector undermine the actual system that is in place.
    Allowing them to collect on accusation alone with "evidence" that can not be questioned perverts the laws that are in place.
    Perhaps it is time the people point out to their elected officials that they are supposed to correct any flaws in the system rather than just give one side everything they demand.

    I have a very good feeling that if the law were adapted to the reality of todays market & consumers rather than a bygone era, they would get content into consumers hands at the time, format & price the consumer wanted. This would end much of the infringement. It is impossible and stupid to think that it can ever be completely stopped and rather wasting more time and law chasing an impossible goal, perhaps removing the rewards that allow them to ignore consumer demands might make them deal with today not 150 years ago.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. icon
    toyotabedzrock (profile), 25 Jan 2015 @ 1:18pm

    Remember if a large bureaucracy like the EU acted quickly no one would listen and instead paint them as unelected elites etc.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.