Child Porn Charges Dropped Because Investigators Cut-And-Paste Wrong Info Into Warrant Requests
from the simple-errors-cause-bigger-headaches dept
This could have happened to any civilian, but it happened to a sheriff's deputy. While investigating a former Danes County (WI) deputy for sexual assault charges related to his inappropriate relationship with a convict (state law makes this a sexual assault crime even if consensual, because of the supervisory role deputies have), investigators came across child porn images stored on his computer.The detectives acquired two warrants: one to search Deputy Jeffrey Hilgers' home for evidence of his relationship with the inmate (now out on probation) and one to search his computer for more child porn. But they screwed up. The end result: all seven child pornography charges have been dropped.
Child pornography possession charges against a former Dane County sheriff’s deputy were dismissed Wednesday after a judge ruled that there was a fatal cut-and-paste error on a search warrant that led to the discovery of the illegal images on the deputy’s computers.Hilgers is still possibly on the hook for second-degree sexual assault charges, but everything related to the child porn discovered in his possession has been vanished away. The judge called the error "insurmountable." Details matter, and it makes no difference that it was someone in law enforcement facing these charges. The judge recognized that it was the sort of error anyone could make.
Dane County Circuit Judge John Markson ruled that in fashioning a search warrant for the home of former deputy Jeffrey C. Hilgers, 43, investigators inadvertently used a paragraph which stated that they were seeking child pornography, and not one specifying a search for evidence of an illicit relationship between Hilgers and a woman who was serving a jail sentence at home on electronic monitoring.
“I do think that likely what happened was a result of cutting and pasting by using a warrant from a different case that involved child pornography,” Markson said, agreeing with an explanation for the error provided earlier by Deputy District Attorney Michelle Viste.Anyone could have made this mistake, but that doesn't excuse it. People are wrongly jailed due to procedural errors. And people walk away from criminal charges for the same thing. Our nation's law enforcement officers wield a considerable amount of power -- especially when coupled with government prosecutors. But this power must be constrained if justice is the desired outcome. Not every warrant is its own special snowflake, but if prosecutors want the acquired evidence to hold up in court, they need to be sure those below them have been diligent in their work.
A second-degree assault charge is all that remains -- something that seems extremely odd considering the former deputy and former inmate are now married. (For now...) But the more damning charges no longer exist because someone decided to boilerplate the warrant app using wording borrowed from another case. Warrants may be largely similar but each case is unique, and if the words "probable cause" are going to be worth anything, unfortunate situations like these need to happen. Otherwise, every warrant will become boilerplate and the "probable cause" used to justify the search will be nothing more than taking the (sworn) words out of someone else's mouth and using someone else's alleged misdeeds to justify the search of another person's property.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: 4th amendment, cut and paste, dane county, jeffrey hilgers, mistakes, warrant
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"But they screwed up"
Yeah, right. What's the chance that this wasn't a deliberate action that happened to protect a colleague?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
IQ?
Of course that will do nothing to impact the us vs them attitude. At least initially.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Bravo Hizzoner!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
/s
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: "But they screwed up"
Same could be asked about the name screw-up on the Snowden paperwork or so many other events where paperwork follow-up just doesn't happen.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Dane county? How about a black college student in Walker's Wisconsin?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: IQ?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: IQ?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No, no. Not because of the copy/paste error.
Because a woman married an ex-cop being investigated for child porn.
Tell me I'm not the only one having cold chills should this couple produce a daughter.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
P.S. - Terrorism!!!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Innocent till proven guilty, my friend.
Yeah, I know there is a 50/50 chance you're right.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"7 Counts..."
The fact they charged him suggests the people laying charges were out to get him - no honor among thieves and all that - so I doubt a deliberate mistake. As we saw with the OJ trial, even when the police KNOW the case is huge and the defendant has extraordinary resources, they can be stupid. This was likely just the same random stupidity.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I was going to say the same thing. It seems like there are a lot of cases where judges say sure, the police screwed up the warrant, but we can allow the evidence anyway - if the warrant is not against a cop.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: "7 Counts..."
In today's world, none of that matters. A single explicit picture of someone 17 years, 11 months and 29 days old makes a person a monster who must be locked up for as long as possible.
[ link to this | view in thread ]