More Copyright Trolls Rushing In To Take Advantage Of Canadian Copyright Notice System Loopholes
from the no-longer-relegated-to-underbridge-housing dept
Canada's new copyright notice system is swiftly become a playground for copyright trolls. As Michael Geist reports, Canadian legislators could have baked in a few limitations to curb abuse, but chose instead to ensure the Rightscorps of the world could twist the legislation to their advantage.
Despite more than a year of work on potential regulations – including possible costs to rights holders for sending notifications – Industry Minister James Moore abandoned the process, implementing the system with no costs, no limitations on notice content, no restrictions on settlement demands, and no sanctions for the inclusion of false or misleading information. The government’s backgrounder says that the law “sets clear rules on the content of these notices”, however, it does not restrict the ability for rights holders to include information that goes beyond the statutory minimum.Righstcorp is called out for a reason. It was the first to seize this opportunity to shake down Canadian internet users with pre-settlement offers. To make its requests appear more "reasonable," Rightscorp lied in its letters to alleged infringers.
The notice falsely warns that the recipient could be liable for up to $150,000 per infringement when the reality is that Canadian law caps liability for non-commercial infringement at $5,000 for all infringements. The notice also warns that the user’s Internet service could be suspended, yet there is no such provision under Canadian law.Beyond that, Rightscorp has no intention of litigating these cases -- which would be the only way for it to secure statutory damages. Even in the US, where the sky-high $150,000 applies, Rightscorp has yet to actually sue anyone for copyright infringement. It instead hopes to nickel-and-dime its way to the top of the troll heap with $20/per infringement "settlements."
Now another copyright troll is invading the same territory. CEG TEK (Copyright Enforcement Group… um… TEK) has started sending out reams of useless and misleading paper threatening alleged infringers in Canada, citing the new law in order to appear really, really serious about possibly doing something expensive to those on the receiving end.
At least this letter acknowledges the $5,000 cap on infringement awards, but it only uses that higher number to make its demands in the low-hundreds per infringement more palatable. The rest of it is standard demand letter histrionics.
In Canada, the unauthorized copying, performance, and/or distribution of Rights Owner’s Work is illegal and is subject to civil sanctions (with statutory damages of up to $5,000 or non-statutory damages that could be higher) and/or criminal sanctions, and is a violation of the Canada Copyright Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-42). The recent amendments to the Copyright Act, which came into force on November 2012, have confirmed Rights Owner’s right to have its copyright protected in Canada.Of course, the letter makes it appear as though CEG can actually offer a complete release from legal culpability for only $xxx, and the artful use of ALL CAPS around "SETTLEMENT SOLUTION" and "LEGAL ACTION" could give some recipient the sense that something dangerous lurks behind this mass-mailed "threat." But CEG, like Rightscorp, can't make much money with "LEGAL ACTION." Nope, it's all about "SETTLEMENT SOLUTIONS." Serve to thousands. Collect from tens. Call it a day.
[...]
If you have questions about your legal rights, you should consult with your own legal counsel (i.e., barrister, solicitor, lawyer, and/or attorney).
CEG HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED BY RIGHTS OWNER TO OFFER A SETTLEMENT SOLUTION TO RESOLVE THIS MATTER AND PREVENT LEGAL ACTION.
You have until Saturday, March 28, 2015 to access the settlement offer and settle online.
There's no lawsuit coming. A search for CEG in the Justia database returns a single lawsuit -- and in that one, CEG was the defendant. Perhaps that's why the letter stays suitably vague about the consequences of ignoring these missives. At this point. CEG TEK's business model only allows for repeated sending of demand letters and, if needed, more use of the Caps Lock key.
Still, the shakedowns will have an effect, mostly on the wholly ignorant or easily intimidated -- which makes copyright trolling indistinguishable from any number of scams. The victims are those who don't know any better. And Canada's decision to enact a copyright notice system filled with holes only encourages entities like CEG and Rightscorp to expand their "markets."
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: canada, copyright, copyright trolling, notice
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Caps Lock?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Sometimes the best solution is the one that is the hardest to work towards, but copyright trolls (no matter the form) should be a huge red flag that the law in its current form is broken and the innocent & the guilty (I never said everyone was an angel) are being harassed in these schemes while the law turns a blind eye to creating the problem.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Honestly, the best ROI strategy at this point may be to build a global mesh network (and mesh society), and spray down the parasites with disinfectant when they try to creep in. Building a new world is simply an easier, more attractive task than dealing with the vermin.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
And rebuilding is so much better for the economy *wink* :)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
I said "compelling," not "pro-copyright propaganda, hyperbole, and lies."
It is NOT property and other remuneration solutions exist.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
I said "compelling," not "pro-copyright propaganda, hyperbole, and lies."
It is NOT property and other remuneration solutions exist.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Graduation Day
Another Canajun Poly Tishun has discovered that you can get cash from a troll without even crossing the bridge.
Congratulations to Industry Minister James Moore.
You've entered the Big Boys Game Area.
You're an American Politico now. Cash for favors is so much better than plain old theft eh.
Enjoy the yacht. Did they get you a nice bimbo?
Would you like that line'o'coke refreshed?
---
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Letter
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Is no.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
CEG TEK
Am I safe by forgetting about this notices? ..I do not want to be taken to court and become an example ..if not for nothing else is because I can't afford anything .. a pension cheque does not go very far
Appreciate any feedback about this
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ceg
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
ceg tek
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I paid settlement
Mine was from Shaw Cable, c/o CEG TEK International on behalf of Copyright Owner: SBO Pictures DBA Wicked Pictures for the video of Spin Class Ass 2 which I obtained via BitTorrent.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: I paid settlement
So how much did they get you for. I got an email from CEG TEK International on behalf of Giant Media Group yesterday. I didn't click on the link for fear of giving them any more breadcrumbs to help them find me. How much were they asking?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: I paid settlement
But knowing what I know now I shouldn't have paid.
Read:
http://metronews.ca/news/canada/1348052/canadians-under-no-obligation-to-pay-for-piracy/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: I paid settlement
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Canipre data being used to spread bad Canadian law
http://www.maximumventure.ca/article/are-online-copyright-infringement-laws-affecting-canadians -one-year-laterquestion
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Act_to_amend_the_Copyright_Act_(38th_Canadia n_Parliament,_1st_Session)
[ link to this | view in thread ]