Nintendo Finally To Dip Its Toe In The Smartphone/Tablet Gaming Market
from the about-time dept
Roughly every gamer who grew up in the glorious eighties and who also owns a smart phone has been completely flabbergasted that Nintendo, that icon of our youths, had so steadfastly resisted getting involved in mobile-device gaming unless the hardware had its logo slapped on the back. Add to that the company's drumbeat against emulators on phones and tablets that would allow gamers to play the amazing back-catalog of games-gone-by while simultaneously refusing to release any of those games for those devices themselves and at times it appears that Nintendo hates money. Recently, we even covered Nintendo's odd decision to go the opposite direction and port common smartphone and tablet games to Nintendo handheld hardware. This whole refusal to get with the times has come off as downright crazy.
Well, in a spot of good news, it looks like Nintendo is finally starting to dip its toes in the smartphone and tablet market.
Nintendo announced today that the company has entered into a "business and capital alliance" with Japanese online giant DeNA. As part of this alliance, the two companies will team up (a press release specifically mentions "joint development") to release "gaming applications for smart devices". These games will use Nintendo IP.You may be thinking, "Duh, why wouldn't they do this?", but that's the question Nintendo fans have been asking for several years now. The fact is that the gaming giant has completely ignored the very existence of these mobile gaming platforms everyone has these days. Still, developing new games using Nintendo IP for phones and tablets is a nice move, but if it really takes off and it's successful? Perhaps that's when we'll finally see the back catalog of games open up officially.
And, while the wording is a bit vague and Nintendo insists it will continue being in the hardware business, check this Nintendo statement out.
Nintendo and DeNA expect to develop a new core system compatible with a variety of devices including PCs, smartphones and tablets as well as Nintendo's dedicated video game systems, and are to jointly develop a membership service utilizing this system, with a launch targeted for the fall of 2015. The companies expect to further enhance their customer relationships through the membership service.Nintendo games possibly on the PC? It'd be a bold move, and a massive departure from the Nintendo of the past... and it would be smart as hell. Perhaps the gaming giant of my youth is finally embracing the present, if not the future.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: games, smartphones, tablets
Companies: nintendo
Reader Comments
The First Word
“You gotta be kidding me
Gamer here. Grew up (partially) in the 80s. Still have fond memories of playing games on the NES and SNES consoles."Completely flabbergasted" that Nintendo... has so steadfastly resisted getting involved in mobile-device gaming? Not in the slightest.
First off, bear in mind that Nintendo essentially invented "mobile device gaming." They called it the Game Boy, and it was one of the most successful consoles of all time. Its successors are still doing well today.
But that's not what you're talking about here, is it? You don't really mean mobile devices, you mean smartphones. Well, there's a perfectly good reason for that: Have you ever tried actually playing games on a smartphone? They suck!
Smartphones are great for doing what they're designed for, but console-style gaming, rich in games whose gameplay style requires multiple buttons that can be manipulated by touch (without looking at them) and pressed at the same time is not one of them. It's no wonder that the most popular smartphone games have all had incredibly simplistic interfaces; that's all you can do. If you want to actually play console games on a smartphone OS, you basically need to get an OUYA. Nintendo's been wise to stay out of that particular mess thus far.
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
At least Nintendo is still around, if the only one remaining from the 'golden era' of computer video games.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Showing how little Techdirters know about copyright!
"And what are fans supposed to do when a gaming company closed down many years ago, apparently taking its copyrights into the grave with it?" -- Copyright simply recognizes the right to sue in civil court if your intellectual products are stolen or publicly distributed. If no entity exists or one does but has no money or no inclination to sue, then there's effectively no copyright.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Android phone is for games
Android phone is for games
And Nintendo get the blame
Games, games, games!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
About time
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Well, just don't expect 'proper' Nintendo games on smartphones. Or ports. Or old games.
So don't expect anything that you'd expect Nintendo to usually make, and expect these games to actively advertise Nintendo's hardware and the 'real' games on them. Which is a fairly sensible move, in my opinion. Nintendo should certainly not be trying to port over old games that were never designed for the limited interface of smartphones. Their smartphone efforts will likely be a 'third pillar' as a supplement to handhelds and consoles.
And no, they're not developing content for PCs, that's just their new account system (to replace Nintendo Network accounts and Club Nintendo and basically merge them), which can be accessed via PC.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"High Definition? Our consumers don't care for HD." - Result: The Wii, while a very great seller for Nintendo, now holds several "records", such as: Console with the lowest amount of published titles (of an active company), including its own N64, fastest loss of developer support in gaming history, and consumers left with a paper weight since the company itself ditched its own system for one with HD.
"Our customers don't want online gaming." Result: Yeah, those Friend Codes were such a great idea. /sarcasm
In fact, nothing Iwata has done, since taking the lead role, has done any good for Nintendo, which still remains nothing short than a company who offers gimmicks.
Such a shame, because they can still command some of the best games on the market, even if that market is the size of a pinhead.
PS: Nintendo is already working on its latest console. Huh. I wonder why.
Until Nintendo fires Iwata, this isn't the Nintendo we grew up with.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The Nintendo we grew up with was a horrible company that engaged in lots of awful behavior. The "old" Nintendo wasn't exactly a company that should be held as an example of a good thing.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
So this too is a bad move?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: DRM, etc.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You gotta be kidding me
"Completely flabbergasted" that Nintendo... has so steadfastly resisted getting involved in mobile-device gaming? Not in the slightest.
First off, bear in mind that Nintendo essentially invented "mobile device gaming." They called it the Game Boy, and it was one of the most successful consoles of all time. Its successors are still doing well today.
But that's not what you're talking about here, is it? You don't really mean mobile devices, you mean smartphones. Well, there's a perfectly good reason for that: Have you ever tried actually playing games on a smartphone? They suck!
Smartphones are great for doing what they're designed for, but console-style gaming, rich in games whose gameplay style requires multiple buttons that can be manipulated by touch (without looking at them) and pressed at the same time is not one of them. It's no wonder that the most popular smartphone games have all had incredibly simplistic interfaces; that's all you can do. If you want to actually play console games on a smartphone OS, you basically need to get an OUYA. Nintendo's been wise to stay out of that particular mess thus far.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You gotta be kidding me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: You gotta be kidding me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: You gotta be kidding me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: You gotta be kidding me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: You gotta be kidding me
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dear Nintendo
I greatly enjoyed the NES and SNES, but you are no longer relevant in the market. If you want to become relevant again, please rid your selves of the filth hubris you have an and try to make customers happy again and stop the stupid shit like "we own all videos made of the games you play".
Thank you,
A past but not happy customer!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A bit of a note to Timothy and readers:
Good thing too, in my opinion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]