70% Of Fans Still Can't Watch LA Dodgers Games On TV Thanks To Time Warner Cable
from the good-job,-team dept
Last year Time Warner Cable and the Los Angeles Dodgers struck a twenty-five year, $8.35 billion deal giving Time Warner Cable the exclusive broadcast rights to all Dodgers games in Los Angeles via its creatively-named regional sports network, Time Warner Cable SportsNet LA. Time Warner Cable then immediately turned around and demanded massive price hikes (rumored to be around $5 per subscriber) for any other pay TV provider that wanted to offer the channel. All of the regional cable operators (including AT&T, Cox, Dish and DirecTV) balked at the hike, resulting about 70% of fans in Dodgers territory being unable to watch the final six games of last season.All sides had ample opportunity during the offseason to negotiate a fair price, but by all accounts Time Warner Cable simply refused to move on the price tag (though the fact it's in a holding pattern over a Comcast acquisition also likely played a role). As such, the new baseball season kicked off this week and Dodgers fans remain unable to watch their favorite team's games. Making matters worse, Time Warner Cable has refused to seriously answer questions about the logjam, offering some variation of the same statement over and over again:
"We want all Dodger fans to have access to SportsNet LA. Despite our repeated attempts, other providers are unwilling to engage in any discussions. If Dodger fans want to enjoy SportsNet LA this season, we encourage them to switch to a provider that carries the network."The problem with that logic? Time Warner Cable is the only cable operator offering access to its own sports network, and 70% of Los Angeles lives in an area where they can't get Time Warner Cable. As such, Time Warner Cable's recommendation is not only useless, it's insulting. When that's pointed out, the company just refuses to comment. When asked why it refuses to compromise on the price, the company provides similarly epic non answers:
"SportsNet LA is available on fair terms consistent with its value. We know that the rates for the network owned by this iconic franchise are in line with what other RSN’s around the country charge, including DirecTV’s own regional sports networks."While it's understandable that Time Warner Cable wants to recoup its investment, the total inflexibility here is pretty well in character for a company that actually has worse customer satisfaction ratings than even the much-hated Comcast. The growing cost of sports programming and the steady increase in annoying retransmission fee dispute blackouts usually help drive cord cutting, but in this case there's absolutely nowhere else to go to watch the content in question. Even over the air broadcasts aren't an option thanks to the nature of the Time Warner Cable, Dodgers arrangement.
So far, regulators have chosen to treat these kinds of programming rate standoffs as just "boys being boys," but it's unclear how much longer they're going to be willing to stand on the sidelines given how much politicians love to earn cheap, sports-related political brownie points. Last year FCC boss Tom Wheeler sent a letter to Time Warner Cable claiming that "inaction is no longer acceptable" and the FCC was "monitor(ing) this situation closely in order to determine whether intervention is appropriate and necessary." But the FCC has said little since. Given that three of the companies involved in the standoff (AT&T, DirecTV and Time Warner Cable) are awaiting merger approval, conditions might be used to force the issue over the next few weeks.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: blackouts, deals, dodgers, sports, tv
Companies: comcast, los angeles dodgers, sportsnet la, time warner cable
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
They'll simply, eventually, find something else to do
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They'll simply, eventually, find something else to do
And as a side note, I called Time Warner to complain about the 300 Mbps I was paying for while getting 100 Mbps (it had just gone up). They offered to flash my router, but I just asked them to downgrade me to 50 Mbps and save $30 per month.
They just did it and 5 minutes later it was done. No hour-long phone call. No BS sales techniques. And I'm not expecting to be called A**hole on my next bill.
Just quick, efficient service.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Truer words never spoken. After all, the value of SportsNet LA to 70% of Los Angeles consumers is zero! ;D
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
...or your product/service sucks!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why bother?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Why bother?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No team responsibility?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...only the geniuses in charge of the entertainment industry routinely try and do this by actively blocking as many potential customers as they can in the hopes of retaining the ability to fleece their preferred group. Same old story, I can't wait for the chorus of "those evil prated streams or stealing our money!" when fans find a ay to view the games anyway.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Dodgers & TWC
That will also solve the problem of not seeing the Dodger games. Not that I care any more. I haven't seen any for more than a year, so the Dodgers don't exist for me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dodgers & TWC
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
the linchpin
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Piracy?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Piracy?
YOU GOT IT! Because you leave out the vital point: content creators getting money for the wanted product. Pirates by definition don't pay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Piracy?
Pirates might pay down the line, but only if it's possible to pay. In a situation like this, the company should be hoping that people bother to pirate, as the alternative, simply not watching and losing interest in the team, is much worse for them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Piracy?
Um...are you an idiot? No, seriously, are you an idiot? Please, tell us all Great and All-Knowing AC, HOW in the name of Holy Copyright are we supposed to buy a product THAT IS NOT OFFERED???
WHY would pirates pay for a product THEY CAN'T BUY???
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Piracy? -- Oh, I didn't know you're entitled!
Whether it's on offer or not is ENTIRELY up to the OWNER. You have no rights or say in the matter. That's called the free market: sellers can choose to withhold product from the market. When it's mere entertainment, there are no over-riding concerns. You'll just have to suffer.
And, as usual, a pirate is pretending that they would pay, if only given the chance.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Piracy? -- Oh, I didn't know you're entitled!
It may be "free market" but that then does NOT give them those exclusive *granted rights* under the copyright clause.
If your way is SO righteous, how about making something and then NEVER offering it for sale? THAT will teach the leeches! Think of the FORTUNE you will make by never making any of your works available at any price!
What idiot makes a piece of entertainment and then WITHHOLDS it from the audience that it was made for? And then there is no money made from it?? How the HELL can you blame pirates for this??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Piracy? -- Oh, I didn't know you're entitled!
That's fair, but, if they refuse to sell it at all, they don't get to turn around and whine about how many sales they're losing to piracy, and how it's utterly decimating their business.
If they were never going to make a sale, due to their own idiocy, then it's impossible for them to lose a sale, in any fashion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And now we finally know...
Too bad we can't send Sisko to deal with Time Warner, as he seems to have a way of getting the job done.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Time Warner kaka
EVERYBODY do what i do, figure out how to change your computer's location to Guam and get every game on MLBTV.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No it mutherfucker isn't
TWC You beter watch for your fucking safety if I ever catch one of you
[ link to this | view in chronology ]