Verizon Buys AOL, Because Two Lumbering Dinosaurs Who Can't Figure Out The Modern Internet Must Be Better Together
from the this-might-get-interesting dept
You might recall that last October, Verizon tried its hand at getting into the media business with the launch of a tech blog by the name of Sugarstring. The bizarre foray into media didn't last long; editors quickly complained that Verizon was prohibiting them from talking about huge tech issues Verizon played a starring role in, ranging from net neutrality to domestic surveillance. After the media ridiculed the hell out of Verizon's ham-fisted disregard of editorial firewalls (or just common sense), the website was quietly shuttered, with the telco saying it was just a "pilot project" it was moving on from.So what is Verizon's media plan 2.0 going to be? Apparently, it's a little something called AOL. Verizon this morning announced that the company would be buying AOL for around $4.4 billion, stating the acquisition would be supporting the telco's over the top video and Internet-of Things ambitions (read: they wanted AOL's ad empire):
"Verizon is a leader in mobile and OTT connected platforms, and the combination of Verizon and AOL creates a unique and scaled mobile and OTT media platform for creators, consumers and advertisers. The visions of Verizon and AOL are shared; the companies have existing successful partnerships, and we are excited to work with the team at Verizon to create the next generation of media through mobile and video."Nobody on Earth flubbed the dial-up to broadband era transition quite as spectacularly as AOL did, so being acquired by a telecom operator ten years too late isn't without it's irony. Equally ironic is Verizon suddenly acquiring 2.2 million new dial-up subscribers at a time when it's desperately trying to back away from the fixed-line broadband business (how many DSL lines would $4.4 billion upgrade?). But AOL's a very different company these days, and the acquisition makes sense as a mobile advertising play, even if it just feels weird to see the two companies snuggle up in bed together.
Apparently, current AOL CEO Tim Armstrong will remain in command under the freshly-acquired AOL, which will operate as an independent Verizon subsidiary. There's no declaration of retained editorial independence anywhere, but that may not mean much. From a memo from Armstrong sent to all AOL employees this morning:
"The leadership at AOL is staying and I am staying – enthusiastically, and we made that part of the deal. We have the opportunity to build a unique and globally scaled media technology company with the scale and resources we need to make that happen. Verizon and AOL are very large partners today – in content, in ads, and in the technology. We know their team well and they know our team well. The cultures share very similar values and are both working on very similar ways to do good while doing well."Do those "values" and "doing good" include propping up Verizon's role as one of the most vocal and obnoxious opponents to net neutrality on the Internet? Stay tuned. There's some chatter that Verizon may want to spin off or sell off the content companies, just using the remaining ad empire to fuel the telco's new wireless-focus Internet video subscription service expected to launch sometime later this year. If retained, you'd like to think Verizon will play it smart and not aggressively meddle in the daily dealings of websites like The Huffington Post, Engadget, or TechCrunch, but with the telco's generation-long history of aggressively bad ideas (most recently being a foray into undeletable super cookies), you just never know.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
I hear you. I'm having trouble picturing dinosaurs mating.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
You were a wonderful site all these years.
If you're not separated by the purchase of AOL, then Verizon will make sure you become absolutely useless.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
It was just a shame that the 1.44MB floppy was the last (and biggest) non-propietary portable magnetic storage medium -- before standards-fragmentation allowed CDs to completely take over the market formerly occupied by inherently-rewritable magnetic disks.
After that, AOL disks went straight to the trash.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Did they seriously mail out rewritable CDs?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It is NOT ten years too late for Verizon to acquire AOL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: It is NOT ten years too late for Verizon to acquire AOL
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To make hand over fistsfull of cash while simultaneously screwing as many customers as possible.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
But will this Verizon-AOL purchase end up the same way as Microsoft/Yahoo or Comcast/Warner-Cable?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
But will this Verizon-AOL purchase end up the same way as Microsoft/Yahoo or Comcast/Warner-Cable?
Or AOL/Time-Warner...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
$4.4 billion, eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: $4.4 billion, eh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Good Buy!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Good Buy!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
AOL is Verizon's Sony
Remember it's all a game of money and power.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: AOL is Verizon's Sony
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Maybe..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's bandwidth envy
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
*Raises Glass to AOL*
Now, I'm glad they did so Verizon wouldn't get their filthy hands on it.
I think I'mma go see what I can pull out of the Internet Archive for that site, before it gets yanked completely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]