Senate Fails To Pass Both USA Freedom And PATRIOT Act Extension, Setting Up Possible Expiration Of Section 215
from the the-drama-rises dept
Well, well. Here's a quick (rare) Saturday post just to get folks up to speed on what happened late last night. After going back and forth for a while, the Senate voted on... and failed to approve both a version of the USA Freedom Act and a short "clean extension" of the clauses of the PATRIOT Act that were set to expire -- mainly Section 215 which some (falsely) believe enables the NSA to collect bulk metadata from telcos (and potentially others). What this means is that it is much more likely that Section 215 expires entirely. The Senate has since left town, though it plans to come back next Sunday, May 31st to see if it can hammer out some sort of agreement. Though, beware of false compromises, such as those being pushed by Senate Intelligence Committee (and big time NSA supporter), Richard Burr. His "hastily introduced" bill pretends to try to "bridge the gap" but in actuality is much worse than basically anything else on the table.Oftentimes when things like this happen, it's all political theater -- with Senators appearing to "take stands" on key issues to please constituents. This time, however, there does seem to be genuine confusion as to where this is all going to end up. Next week ought to be fairly interesting...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: mitch mcconnell, patriot act, rand paul, richard burr, section 215, senate, usa freedom act
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
On top of that...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: On top of that...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: On top of that...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: On top of that...
"We urge all voting senators and congressmen to reject the amendment added by Mr. Menendez. Human trafficking is bad, there is no doubt, but far worse would be not passing TPP, which stands to benefit the citizens in all the signatory counties. You know, everyone except for the slaves."
'White House comes out in favor of modern day slavery', the headlines would practically write themselves, if the press had the guts to write it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: On top of that...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or, hopefully current cases (especially for programs like PRISM, xkeyscore, etc.) could proceed as challenges to EO 12333.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I expect something far worse than the patriot act will be passed when they are next in session
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Shrug
More likely than not this will end up being the pig of Burr with lipstick on. And it will be discovered afterwards that it was poisonous lipstick, too.
This is Senate, after all.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Shrug
...did I just really reference Batman & Robin? I think I'll go hide now.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rubber Lips
Rubber lips were also used by the Joker in The Dark Knight Returns.
It's the old rubber-lips-to-block-the-poison-lipstick trick.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Exactly how many terrorists has the federal government captured since 2005, within the borders of the United States? Not enough to continue the act. Americans are more aware today then they were 10 years ago.
With election season coming up fast, every politician in congress is vulnerable if they vote to pass anything related to The Patriot Act and it's a sensitive issue, with many Americans and many civil rights groups opposing it.
Where it stands now, congress needs to let The Patriot Act expire and leave it buried in the ground. Otherwise, a lot of Democrats and Republicans will be in danger of losing their seats if they vote for passage.
"Terrorist" seems to be a new boogeyman threat whenever our government in danger of losing the powers granted under The Patriot Act. Its time that our representatives in congress start listening to the will of the people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
IOW Congress hasn't listened to the "will of the people" for at least a hundred years. What makes one think they'll start now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Exactly how many terrorists has the federal government captured since 2005, within the borders of the United States? Not enough to continue the act. Americans are more aware today then they were 10 years ago.
People aren't that much more aware than they were 10 years ago. People just want to be safe. We will never know how many terrorists were captured in the US - don't they still rendition terrorists?
Terrorism is still one of the top 10 problems we face according to Gallup (government was listed as the #1 problem http://www.gallup.com/poll/181946/americans-name-government-no-problem.aspx) The politicians will demagogue both sides of the issue. Nobody is going to lose an election over this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I wouldn't be so sure, chances are the sheeple will keep voting for the same guy until they scrape his stinking corpse out of his chair.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I sure hope so, but there will be one last push on May 31 to pass it and I fear they will pass it. We need to keep calling Senators to tell them to reject the extension.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pressure from the NSA via biographical leverage
In the meantime, we proceed to encrypt internet communications end-to-end until they can spy all they want and still have nothing to process, and feed from big bads has to be run through number-crunchers the size of nuclear reactors before they have viable data to process.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Pressure from the NSA via biographical leverage
Agreed. Encrypt all the things. So what's your public key?
Almost no one has any, because that's a pain in the ass. Usability is important too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Admissability of spying data
That is the whole point, for instance, of the FISC is to issue warrants (which they do in excess) on spying data that's already collected so that it may be used if necessary. That's why there are regulations about what kinds of cell-phone data (metadata but not conversations except by warrant) or emails (after 180 days or when held by a third party) are collected above board.
Parallel reconstruction is there to reduce our dependence on any data which is obtained via secret or questionable ways, either to keep detection methods obscure (security through obscurity) or to prevent a method from being challenged as contrary to Forth-Amendment protections.
I do have a public key (buried) that I've never used because no-one else does. But this a problem with implementation. I remember once wrestling with winsock software in order to get internet access, where now it's hard to get my devices to not sign on.
I think we're approaching an era in which encryption will be as transparent to the user as our current HTTPS use. The notion of this era terrifies the FBI and law enforcement worldwide since they will actually have to deal with human privacy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Will he actually filibuster the 31st or just keep it to the grandstanding he did last week.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
its not going to sunset
https://www.emptywheel.net/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
/sarcasm... or sad but true. take your pick. (i'd pick both)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
us senate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: us senate
The problem is that most of that work is fundraising (or related activities) for their reelection campaigns, and the consequences they are most exposed to is being unable to get any of that sweet corporate money.
They also don't get an unusual amount of vacation days. this is a little confused, because when congress adjourns for a vacation, it's not really a vacation. It's the time that congresspeople return to their districts and continue to work (mostly with fundraising).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]