UK Government Goes Full Orwell: Snooper's Charter, Encryption Backdoors, Free Speech Suppression
from the 1984-wasn't-a-manual dept
The old joke goes "George Orwell's 1984 was a warning, not a 'how to' manual." But that joke is increasingly less funny as the UK really seems to be doing everything it can to put in place Orwell's fictitious vision -- just a few decades later. Right after the election a few weeks ago, we noted the government's plan to push forward with its "extremist disruption orders" (as had been promised). The basic idea is that if the government doesn't like what you're saying, it can define your statements as "extremist" and make them criminal. Prime Minister David Cameron did his best Orwell in flat out stating that the idea was to use these to go after people who were obeying the law and then arguing that the UK needed to suppress free speech... in the name of protecting free speech. Really.For too long, we have been a passively tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone. It’s often meant we have stood neutral between different values. And that’s helped foster a narrative of extremism and grievance.It's a fairly amazing speech where Cameron can -- within just a few sentences -- both argue for the rule of law and that obeying the rule of law should not keep you out of trouble.
This government will conclusively turn the page on this failed approach. As the party of one nation, we will govern as one nation and bring our country together. That means actively promoting certain values.
Freedom of speech. Freedom of worship. Democracy. The rule of law. Equal rights regardless of race, gender or sexuality.
We must say to our citizens: this is what defines us as a society.
Earlier this week, the Queen gave her traditional "Queen's Speech" which lays out the legislative agenda for the new Parliament, and it went quickly down the Orwellian path as well. Apparently, suppressing free speech and civil liberties will be done in the name of mandatory "social cohesion."
Measures will also be brought forward to promote social cohesion and protect people by tackling extremism. New legislation will modernise the law on communications data, improve the law on policing and criminal justice, and ban the new generation of psychoactive drugs.That first sentence is about the extremism orders, but the second part may be even more troubling. It's the Queen making it clear that the Snooper's Charter is returning -- but even worse than before. If you don't recall, the UK government has been trying to pass this bill that would grant the government massive surveillance powers. David Cameron insists this is necessary because he's seen it work on fictional crime shows that he watches on TV (really). The last major attempt to push this through failed thanks to then Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg blocking it. But with Clegg out of the way following the last election, the government is going for the gold in pushing for an even broader Snooper's Charter including mandatory backdoors into encryption:
In a surprise move, the government is to introduce an investigatory powers bill far more wide-ranging than expected. The legislation will include not only the expected snooper’s charter, enabling the tracking of everyone’s web and social media use, but also moves to strengthen the security services’ warranted powers for the bulk interception of the content of communications.Of course, as we've been discussing for quite some time now, such backdoors into encryption are monumentally stupid and counterproductive. They weaken the security and privacy of everyone. And, of course, we've already discussed how once one country demands its own backdoors, others will want them as well. And, of course, such backdoors always come back to bite everyone by opening up avenues for malicious and nefarious attacks -- no matter how often law enforcement insists that it can keep things safe. You are, by definition, opening up a vulnerability. And it will lead to less safety and security.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: backdoors, bulk collection, david cameron, encryption, extremism disruption orders, free speech, investigatory powers, mass surveillance, queen's speech, snooper's charter, uk
Reader Comments
The First Word
“This isn't for protecting peasants
And it will lead to less safety and security.It isn't about safety and security for the peasants; its about safety and security for the ruling class.
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
the queen is really hitler
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: the queen is really hitler
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: the queen is really hitler
Lots of people think British royalty are entertaining, so maybe it's justifiable PR. It brings in the marks (or dollars).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Social cohesion"
Ah, well Liberalism had a good run.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "Social cohesion"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: "Social cohesion"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: "Social cohesion"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: "Social cohesion"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: "Social cohesion"
It's peculiar how many Americans see their idiosyncratic definition of liberal as representative of the word's place in a global context, rather than the exception.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: "Social cohesion"
you mean like:
New York
Chicago
Boston
Portland
Seattle
San Francisco
San Diego
Los Angles
Austin
San Antonio
Detroit
Miami
In fact, of the 50 largest cities in the US, only 13 have republican mayors.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: "Social cohesion"
Just die already, you silly twat!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: "Social cohesion"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: "Social cohesion"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: "Social cohesion"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I actually lol'd. It's amazing anyone would actually say this out loud.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Or at least a monarchy that has the guts to nullify by decree any action of the PM or legislature. Supposedly the UK had that at one time but if Her Majesty has actually done that I've never heard about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
I mean, I guess I'd like my face on the 20 canadian dollars bill for just a little less time too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Social Cohesion
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
sharia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sharia
So he wants to save British society by destroying British society.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: sharia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sharia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: sharia
At least Cameron has some sensory apparatus.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Focus People
"That means actively promoting certain values."
"Freedom of speech. Freedom of worship. Democracy. The rule of law. Equal rights regardless of race, gender or sexuality."
"We must say to our citizens: this is what defines us as a society."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Focus People
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sharia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sharia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sharia
That statement speaks volumes. "Passively tolerant" == "weak and decadent." Perhaps Britain would have been better off if it had lost the Battle of Britain. Be careful what you wish for.
I always believed that in a democracy the people decided which way to go, but you're saying it would be better if the elected representatives of that democracy just hands down marching orders which prescribe the correct course, and the rest go to the tower? Seig heil!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: sharia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sharia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sharia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: sharia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If you obey the law, you have nothing to fear.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The thing about extremism...
If you pass a law that outlaws extreme morals/ethics, what actually happens?
You trim off the extremes, making the spread a bit smaller. At which point, there are new extremes.
This will keep happening until everyone who isn't in jail is average -- and with no above/below average morals/ethics in the society, you have no above/below average performers.
And so dies the society. It wouldn't even survive like it does in 1984, unless those who are extremists have two paths to take: go to jail, or be selected by like-minded extremists to lead the society.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The thing about extremism...
Since such laws are themselves acts of extremism, if this were a just universe than the legal system itself would come to a screeching halt due to runaway recursion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This isn't for protecting peasants
It isn't about safety and security for the peasants; its about safety and security for the ruling class.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: This isn't for protecting peasants
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
7%
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: 7%
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Irony?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Irony?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: News Dissemination
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ihatemybrain
This slogan comes to mind:
"Strength through Unity. Unity through Faith"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Ihatemybrain
Lets hope it ends the same way as the moVie... ;-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
https://www.openrightsgroup.org/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Should have let the Nazis have them...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
If they did that here. . .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Fixed that for you.
No offense meant to those with an IQ under 80.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"That means actively promoting certain values. "
C'mon David, don't mince terms. You're embarking on a Holy War, a Crusade of sorts, aimed at anyone who disagrees with your vision of what Britain should be and what it should stand for. I thought Britain was a democracy, but I see you've had enough of that farcical charade.
The word for that is tyranny. I look forward to seeing you hanging by your feet from a meathook. Have a short life.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lefty liberals
Americans are so stupid,
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Bet those people who voted Torie are feeling PRETTY stupid right now and according to recent polls they're already pissed off. Good job Cammy-Boy! Only a few weeks in and already you've pissed off most of the UK! Bravo, BRAVO!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I would be leaving the country if British. I got a slush fund in case Canada becomes a fascist hole too, somewhere like the Fijii islands, I'll drink kava kava all day and pass out probably as far as possible from another country as possible when I'm there thinking about it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]