Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt

from the the-long-view dept

This week, as part of its fearmongering duties regarding the PATRIOT Act, the New York Times quoted a senior administration official as saying "we're in uncharted waters." This tired cliche spawned one anonymous commenter to give us our most insightful comment of the week:

No the fuck we're not. We've been fine for hundreds of years. This ramping up of insanity has only been a recent blip on this country's history.

In second place, we've got a comment from Just Another Anonymous Troll, who cut through the legal details to note that Sherlock Holmes being under copyright makes no sense and serves no purpose:

So glad that the corpse of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is still able to receive royalties, just in case he spontaneously reanimates and needs to buy brains or something.

For editor's choice on the insightful side, we'll start out with one more comment on the same subject from s7, this time really putting the absurd length of copyright in perspective:

Making copyright longer isn't promoting anyone to make anything new, it just makes sure that Great Grand kids get paid for something they had nothing to do with creating, way before they were even born.

These are some things that happened in 1923. It was a LONG time ago.

===================

Time Magazine is launched on March 3rd

The Hunchback of Notre Dame, starring Lon Chaney is released.

Women's One Piece swimming suits begin to be worn.

The Ten Commandments directed by Cecil B. DeMille.

First Le Mans 24 hour race run in France.

The first Yankee Stadium opens its doors in the Bronx, New York City

The Hollywood Sign is inaugurated in California (originally reading Hollywoodland)

Roy and Walt Disney found The Walt Disney Company

===================

I don't know how long copyright should last, but it should be a lot shorter than it is now.

You could still buy a NEW Ford Model-T from Ford when these last ten stories were published for crying out loud.

Next, we've got a response from That One Guy to Ross Ulbricht's sentencing. While nobody was especially surprised by the punishment, and nobody's claiming he's innocent, it bears noting that once again, the hammer of justice is capricious and imbalanced:

Ross Ulbricht, who created and ran a marketplace to sell illegal drugs, is sentenced to two life sentences, along with "max sentences on all other charges", and is held personally responsible for every single sale made.

Large banks, who launder money for drug cartels, aren't prosecuted at all, because the government sees them as 'too big to prosecute', and the potential economic harm too large should they do so.

Other than one of the people involved in leaking the details of it, not a single person in the US involved in the kidnapping, torture, and at times murder of enemy combatants and even civilians has faced any charges at all, without even an investigation into a single one of them.

So, to sum up:

Operate a marketplace where illegal drugs are sold: Two life sentences, held financially personally responsible for each and every sale.

Launder money for drug sellers: No investigation, no charges brought.

Order or perform the kidnapping, torture, and murder of prisoners and/or civilians: No investigation, no charges brought.

As the US 'justice' system, truly an icon of fair treatment for all, no matter their crime, position, or the size of their bank account. /s

Over on the funny side, we start out with what may go down in Techdirt history as a famous funny comment: Joe randomly took it upon himself to gather some stats about the Techdirt lexicon:

Techdirt Swearing stats

I get Techdirt by RSS so I had some fun checking out which author has the biggest potty mouth.

This is highly (non) scientific based on what stories were in my RSS folder this afternoon.

Pics or it didn't happen - https://imgur.com/a/VhMxm

Bullshit
Mike Masnick - 9
Karl Bode - 6
Tim Cushing - 6
Timothy Geigner - 3
Leigh Beadon - 1
Michael Ho - 0

Fuck
Mike Masnick - 6
Karl Bode - 0
Tim Cushing - 6
Timothy Geigner - 3
Leigh Beadon - 2
Michael Ho - 1

Shit
Mike Masnick - 13
Karl Bode - 10
Tim Cushing - 10
Timothy Geigner - 9
Leigh Beadon - 1
Michael Ho - 0

Conclusions

1. Michael Ho's mother reads all of his articles.

2. Karl Bode doesn't like the F word.

3. Mike and Tim C are part time sailors.

Side note: stats for the word 'shit' include it's presence in the term 'bullshit'. So of the 13 times Mike said 'shit', only 4 of those were plain old 'shit', indicating a 69.2% preference for 'bullshit'.

In second place, we've got a fucking response to the "reputation management" company sending out incredibly dubious threats(-ish) for a high price tag. Among the many red flags on the service, Bt Garner couldn't ignore their hideously designed materials:

Is it just me, or does that "Notice of Infringement of Defamation" letter look like a "Participation Certificate" for a School's Field Day where they could not afford ribbons for everyone?

For editor's choice on the funny side, we start out on yet another story about police misbehavior where someone played the "what if..." card to sow fear and doubt. Eponymous Coward crafted a truly excellent response to this tactic:

Ooh, Worst-Case Scenario, the Home Version, I love this game!! My turn.

What happens when, in case 1 or 2, the cop performing the search is too busy violating his oath and the citizen's rights to notice the bug meteor that is heading their way? His diverted attention allows the meteor to continue unimpeded, and when it strikes the ground it vaporizes 3 million soup kitchen workers and one very unfortunate alpaca named Constance. Sadly, the illegally detained citizen was a super scientist who was seconds from finishing his anti-meteor shield, and had he been able to get to his lab on time we would have been spared this horrible, alpaca-rending fate.

I'll always win this game, because your vision of unreality is too limted.

Finally, we've got a comment on our post about this week's Most Hated Man Online, Richard Prince. After we pointed out that the Washington Post was clueless in its assertion that Prince's work means your Instagram photos aren't really yours, one anonymous commenter thought it fair to cut them a little slack:

In a world where the RIAA argues your CDs aren't your CDs, Facebook argues your posts aren't your posts, and tractor companies argue your tractors aren't your tractors - is it really surprising someone would end up making the above conclusion?

That's all for this week, folks!

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 May 2015 @ 12:55pm

    I loved the worst case scenario response. Just as awesome was the nod to Douglas Adams just a bit further down in response to Eponymous Coward lol.

    https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150525/15082831097/court-shuts-down-nypds-argument-that-when -searching-black-male-suspects-any-black-male-will-do.shtml?threaded=true#c367

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    CK20XX (profile), 31 May 2015 @ 2:08pm

    I'd much rather see the Ross Ulbricht case turn out like Frank Abagnale's. There's a guy who did a lot of stupid things in his youth and was practically thumbing his nose at the law even after he got sent to prison, but quickly turned his life around and became a productive member of society. We need to see more positive reform cases like that if people are to respect the justice system.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Lawrence D’Oliveiro, 31 May 2015 @ 5:10pm

    On Al Jazeera This Week ...

    ... is doco “Searching for Steele”. James Steele is a specialist in “counter-insurgency” operations. That is, if by “counter-insurgency” you mean “to do with rounding up of anybody you suspect of links to the rebels, holding them in brutal conditions, beating and generally torturing them, and sometimes just killing them”.

    He was a Colonel in charge of a group sent to help prop up the right-wing government in El Salvador during the civil war. Then he popped up in Iraq after the invasion, when it became clear that hopes for “peace”, “freedom” and “democracy” were rapidly receding into the distance. He held no official miliary rank there, but he was directly reporting to Donald Rumsfeld.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 May 2015 @ 5:31pm

    Like naughty kids, you delight when get attention.

    So decided to FEATURE on front page the witty skewering over childish vulgarisms, where adults would take it with some degree of shame.

    But that's Techdirt.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. icon
    That One Guy (profile), 31 May 2015 @ 6:51pm

    Re: On Al Jazeera This Week ...

    Yes, of course, because clearly making your side out to be monsters who brutalize, torture and kill people will decrease the number of people who hate you and are willing to do anything to get you as far away as possible. /s

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    That One Guy (profile), 31 May 2015 @ 6:59pm

    Re:

    Actual respect is something they don't care about, as it takes too much work and would require the system to actually be, you know, just. No, they're perfectly happy to settle with people fearing the system.

    As for reform of prisoners? Yeah, the US 'justice' system is not even remotely interested or aimed towards that, and in fact with how many private, for-profit prisons we've got, the more prisoners the better as far as the system is concerned.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. icon
    techflaws (profile), 31 May 2015 @ 9:54pm

    Re: Like naughty kids, you delight when get attention.

    As are lame comments of asshats like you. So what?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Daydream, 31 May 2015 @ 9:58pm

    Small corrections.

    I'd like to note that all the recorded swear words quoted and otherwise mentioned in this post should raise Leigh Beadon's scores as follows: 'Fuck' up by 3, 'Shit' by 7, 'Bullshit' by 3, with all instances of 'Shit' occurring in 'Bullshit' being separately noted as per usual procedure...

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 May 2015 @ 11:17pm

    Re: Like naughty kids, you delight when get attention.

    Moral High Ground Fallacy:
    in which one assumes a "holier-than-thou" attitude in an attempt to make oneself look good to win an argument.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Jun 2015 @ 12:17am

    Re: Like naughty kids, you delight when get attention.

    Sounds like someone's mad that his spam got glossed over.

    If you don't like the terms given to you, you could always leave. That's what you like to say to consumers, isn't it?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    corey, 4 Jun 2015 @ 3:52pm

    actually

    the absurd length on the copyright is about giving control and continual revenue to corporations and other NON natural persons, who currently hold the copyright, who had absolutely NOTHING to do with creating the original work.

    look at Disney as perfect example. related to the original mickey mouse.

    Another point about the absurd length on copyright is it is recreating the system of "james town" failure. getting paid to do nothing, while those that work hard is getting less or equal as those not actually working.

    That is why the original copyright was limited to 28 years. So those who actually worked hard got paid while those who chose not to work did not.

    It also is a factor of today's wealth inequality. those working the hardest getting barely paid while those who are not working beyond ensuring their free ride getting most of the wealth by holding said copyright.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.