Putin's Internet Propaganda War Is Much Bigger And Weirder Than You Think, Now Extending Into The States
from the ministry-of-truth dept
We've been writing lately about how Putin and Russia have shifted their internet propaganda forces into overdrive, employing multiple factories operated by a company named Internet Research, filling the internet with Putin-friendly drivel twenty-four-hours a day. The insight into these efforts has become more and more interesting as whistleblowers have started exposing (and most recently suing over) them the last six months. Contrary to similar efforts in other countries (U.S. included), there's absolutely no subtlety on display here, and the scale is unlike anything the internet has ever seen.Interestingly, many of the comments to my last piece made some really compelling points regarding what Putin is up to. Here's a small smattering:
Anybody who knows me remotely would find accusations that I'm "pro-US" pretty damn funny given how I've spent most of my career criticizing US government policies. Are these comments ingenious satire? Russian propagandists? Domestic garden-variety home-grown tin-foil hatters? The benefit of propaganda is you just can't tell. But science pretty consistently shows that comments can pretty easily impact discourse, even if what's being posted is relatively unhinged from reality. So to be clear, it's true: I'm a total lackey for western imperialists; a pawn of the NSA and CIA, and as most people know, I make a killing freelancing as a propagandist for AT&T corporation."Karl Bode, author of this very article, has most likely unwittingly fallen for an ukrainian-made honey-pot propaganda trap."
"I cant help see this article as another stone in the western propaganda campaign against Putin the last few months, and not really about social media propaganda."
"The story of that Russian propaganda factory that caught Karl Bode's attention (assuming the story is even true and is not itself a counter-propaganda gig similar to 'WMD') seems very amateurish in comparison to the depth and sophistication to the US military's sock-puppetry programs."
"By writing this horse shit, all Techdirt has done is shown that it's writers are easily manipulated. I expect more pro-US, anti-Russia propaganda from them in the future."
Moving on. While there's no doubt the United States has employed similar tactics for years (profitable wars and shitty foreign policy don't sell themselves, you know), that doesn't make the sheer scale of Putin's troll army any less impressive...or real.
The New York Times Magazine has an outstanding exploration of Putin's propaganda efforts and Russia's Internet Research Agency, connecting a series of incredibly well-constructed hoaxes using fake YouTube videos, fake Wikipedia entries, and thousands of Twitter accounts -- many of which were designed to pollute the global discourse pool here in the States. Author Adrian Chen headed to St. Petersburg to track down and talk to whistleblower Lyudmila Savchuk, who goes into greater detail than ever before about the program. Again, there's propaganda, and then there's what Putin's up to, which is a factory-grade internet assault on reality injected with steroids and caffeine:
"As Savchuk and other former employees describe it, the Internet Research Agency had industrialized the art of trolling. Management was obsessed with statistics — page views, number of posts, a blog’s place on LiveJournal’s traffic charts — and team leaders compelled hard work through a system of bonuses and fines. “It was a very strong corporate feeling,” Savchuk says. Her schedule gave her two 12-hour days in a row, followed by two days off. Over those two shifts she had to meet a quota of five political posts, 10 nonpolitical posts and 150 to 200 comments on other workers’ posts. The grueling schedule wore her down. She began to feel queasy, she said, posting vitriol about opposition leaders of whom she had no actual opinion, or writing nasty words about Ukrainians when some of her closest acquaintances, including her own ex-husband, were Ukrainian."These efforts have become so massive, local journalists claim they have, at least for now, managed to subvert the historical anti-authoritarian and free speech benefits of the internet:
"All of this has contributed to a dawning sense, among the Russian journalists and activists I spoke with, that the Internet is no longer a natural medium for political opposition. “The myth that the Internet is controlled by the opposition is very, very old,” says Leonid Volkov, a liberal politician and campaign manager to Alexei Navalny. “It’s not true since at least three years.” Part of this is simple demographics: The Internet audience has expanded from its early adopters, who were more likely to be well-educated liberal intelligentsia, to the whole of Russia, which overwhelmingly supports Putin. Also, by working every day to spread Kremlin propaganda, the paid trolls have made it impossible for the normal Internet user to separate truth from fiction."The piece repeats previous claims that Russia's industrial-grade propaganda apparatus has fixed its gaze upon the United States, and while so far some of these efforts on places like Facebook are so ham-fisted as to be comical, some of them are absolutely astounding in their scope and architecture. Like the Facebook group of Russian trolls that encourage followers to visit an art exhibit named "Material Evidence" hosted in Chelsea, New York City. The effort, funded by anonymous overseas donors, claims to show the "other side" of the Ukranian conflict and Syrian civil war not shown by Western media:
"Then there were the pictures from the Ukrainian revolution, which focused almost exclusively on the Right Sector, a small group of violent, right-wing, anti-Russian protesters with a fondness for black balaclavas. Russian authorities have seized upon Right Sector to paint the entire revolution, backed by a huge swath of Ukrainian society, as orchestrated by neo-fascist thugs. The show’s decision to juxtapose the rebellions in Syria and Ukraine was never clearly explained, perhaps because the only connection possible was that both targeted leaders supported by Russia. On the floor in front of many of the photos sat the actual items that appeared in them, displayed under glass cases. How, exactly, did organizers procure the very same battered motorcycle helmet that a Ukrainian protester wore in a photo while brawling with riot police? Who had fronted the money to purchase a mangled white van, supposedly used by Syrian rebels in a botched suicide bombing, and transport it to New York City?Let that sink in for a second. Armies of fake U.S. Facebook accounts, sending followers to an entirely fake art exhibit in New York, promoted by an army of fake and hijacked Twitter accounts -- all of it tied to Russia's Internet Research Agency. At one point in his documentation efforts, Chen makes contact and meets up with a supposed Internet Research Agency employee and her brother, only to later discover the entire meeting is a staged photo op, later used by "news organizations" tied to Internet Research to discredit Chen as a neo nazi supporter. That story soon ballooned into a series of other Russian news stories accusing Chen of being BFFs with the NSA, CIA, and neo nazis, accompanied with snazzy videos to "prove" it.
So again, yes, most countries engage in propaganda. That's not really being disputed. Most Americans at this point are at least marginally aware of the propaganda used to sell recent wars conducted by the United States -- and the complicit behavior of the media in these efforts to this day stinks up the hallowed halls of most "respected" American news outlets (the same outlets that love to lecture bloggers on what news really is). But what Putin is up to is a propaganda war against the entire internet, and it makes dystopian visions by the likes of Orwell and Terry Gilliam look like Hardy Boy mysteries. Of course none of that matters because I'm clearly a Western imperialist puppy murderer, and this article was funded by the CIA, as commenters below will be sure to illustrate.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: adrian chen, comments, propaganda, russia, social media, trolls, vladimir putin
Companies: internet research agency
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
There are actually methods to distinguish trolling of this nature from the more garden variety toll.
The main bit to look at is the use of the "Wizard of Oz" technique -- ensure your post is eye-grabbing enough that nobody would think to look AT the curtain, let alone behind it.
The second bit to look at is that such trolling usually pretends to be from someone related to the "bait and switch" discussion being driven.
Regular trolls often have one or the other of these, but the combination usually smacks of political trolling and building a fake story.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I note that this first post has been trashed by subsequent commenters and hidden - however the statement "Our president and his cabinet lie directly to the American people... as does our congress and judges." would probably have been marked insightful had it appeared as a comment on a post on almost any other subject.
Look at the following stories - very quyickly found by Googling "President Lied Techdirt":
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130819/01541724227/down-to-just-few-possibilities-pres ident-obama-either-lied-is-ignorant-about-nsa.shtml
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150424/144432 30784/president-obama-demands-critics-tell-him-whats-wrong-with-tpp-course-we-cant-do-that-because-h e-wont-show-us-agreement.shtml
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130701/12494623683/james-clapper-a dmits-he-lied-to-congress-even-his-excuse-is-misleading.shtml
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131 231/17140325732/stop-letting-nsas-defenders-lie-there-have-been-many-significant-abuses.shtml
and many many more.
If you all think that the US government machine lies consistently about these other issues - why do you think it tells the truth about Russia?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
So precisely what is the point in declaring that "hey guys, the U.S. also does really awful things and lies a lot" pertinent to the conversation specifically about Russian Internet troll farms?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Because US behaviour creates the environment in which other countries such as Russia operate. Also, possibly because many believe that the US has been much more successful than Russia in getting its lies to stick.
You made the point very well that the Russian government has made a huge effort - but done it so badly that few believe what they say - even when it is true!
The US propaganda is in many ways more interesting because it has been subtler and hence vastly more effective.
It follows that those of us "in the middle" who distrust both are more concerned to correct the US lies because no-one believes the Russian ones anyway!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Please Read In A Comically Exaggerated Russian Accent
Do not paying attention to the man behind the curtain with keyboard.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
tu quoque
This is the classic response to criticism of Russia. The US doing bad things has no bearing on Russia doing bad things. and as the author pointed out he is far from a gungho US government supporter.
P.S. the only reason I know about the fallacy tu quoque is because of people like you constantly using it when they have noting else to say:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tu_quoque
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: tu quoque
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: tu quoque
Not quite true in this field. If the US is spreading disinformation about Russia and Russia simply sits back and takes it then there will be an asymmetry.
Tu quoque only fully applies when the parties in question are not in direct conflict with each other. When that is the case then it is necessary to delve back into the history of how the conflict began and developed before one can come to any judgement.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Thrn tell your president, Putin, to not lie to us Americans.
Problem solved.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OMG! "propaganda war against the entire internet"!
>>> "Anybody who knows me remotely" -- you're "loyal opposition": pretending to be against, but supporting it in THIS effort! Old trick.
The minion not only projects that Russia started this propaganda war, but defensively admits he's a partisan in advance of accusations, without any apparent sarcasm. So take minion at its word.
What's amazing is how Techdirt at times rails against the US government, and other times believes it absolutely, and follows the official story. Part of the defensiveness is an attempt to build credibility back, that's all.
Of course, THE REAL PURPOSE HERE IS TO DRAW CLICKS. This is about the only hot topic Techdirt has.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: OMG! "propaganda war against the entire internet"!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: OMG! "propaganda war against the entire internet"!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: OMG! "propaganda war against the entire internet"!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: OMG! "propaganda war against the entire internet"!
But it still attempts to deflect the actual discussion at hand by drawing on straw men, and still tries to generate a different discussion. It is slightly more intelligent in the fact that it also attempts to discount/dismiss not just the author, but the site, using somewhat logical arguments (which it also doesn't fully complete, inviting a SECOND off-topic discussion).
Waiting for more examples to roll in....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: OMG! "propaganda war against the entire internet"!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: OMG! "propaganda war against the entire internet"!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: OMG! "propaganda war against the entire internet"!
I give your writing bad grades for clarity. Please take a short walk down the Nevsky Prospekt, and consider how you will improve going forward.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: OMG! "propaganda war against the entire internet"!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: OMG! "propaganda war against the entire internet"!
See what I did there?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: OMG! "propaganda war against the entire internet"!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: OMG! "propaganda war against the entire internet"!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: OMG! "propaganda war against the entire internet"!
This is straight out of the Emperor's New Clothes. "Anyone who is worthy can see the fine robe that the King is wearing..."
Feel free to cite the actual evidence you're referring to.
"Of course, THE REAL PURPOSE HERE IS TO DRAW CLICKS."
"Nothing to see here, folks!" If this is the motivation, you've apparently been drawn in too. Who's the more foolish, the click-baiter or the bait-clicker?
"This is about the only hot topic Techdirt has."
You didn't do your research well enough. This is a blip on the Techdirt hot topic radar. You'll find a lot more clicks, comments, and more effective trolling on articles on Techdirt related to copyright and other forms of "IP."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
lesson in propaganda
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: lesson in propaganda
I'm waiting to see if the factory keeps trolling the thread, or decides to refocus on other more potentially-influential discussion threads.
But first I'll add the words Crimea invasion for Yandex to slurp up :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: lesson in propaganda
I'm asking because my supervisor grades my comments lower if they get the author's name wrong, and I'm up for a promotion, so it matters.
/Igor
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
4 chan
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My 2 cents.
I suspected as much myself, this is just a confirmation. But a very timely one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We no propoganda.
Love and kisses, Peggy.
PS. I hope Putin doesn't kill you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I believe it, absolutely...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
When you're powerful and you can just click a mouse and fill up someone's PayPal, people will say whatever the fuck you want.
And these days belligerence > facts.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
They'll troll twice has hard for half as much.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The REAL giveaway is referencing New York Times Magazine
Masnick said of The New York Times: "blatant fearmongering without any specifics. It's pure "keep fear alive" in action -- aided along by a stenographer at the NY Times. All the propaganda that's fit to print." -- When it suited his purpose.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150528/06051531134/nytimes-plays-role-keeping-fear-alive -with-pure-fearmongering-over-patriot-act-renewal.shtml
But now that it suits this Bode's purpose, different, huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The REAL giveaway is referencing New York Times Magazine
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The REAL giveaway is referencing New York Times Magazine
Techdirt was consistent to point out propaganda of the US, and propaganda of Russia. That is not an error or an about-face.
Two Dmitri points...er..I mean demerit points. No borscht for you in cafetorium.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
War of Ideas on the Internet
I argued, and still believe, that this method is the future of the nastier side of the war of ideas, and that we will only see more campaigns of this sort. China, Russia, Turkey, Israel, Dell, Islamic State, and (on a more limited scale so far) the US - all of these organizations have used one or more elements of the false-consensus creation tactics I outlined.
Paper was published here in Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict. For the curious that are stymied by the paywall, I've mirrored it here.
I'd also like to take this relevant opportunity to say thank you, as without Techdirt's reporting I would have missed several useful and relevant examples.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: War of Ideas on the Internet
Did you mean to put a PC manufacturer in the middle of that list, or was that a typo?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The REAL giveaway is referencing New York Times Magazine
Masnick said of The New York Times: "blatant fearmongering without any specifics. It's pure "keep fear alive" in action -- aided along by a stenographer at the NY Times. All the propaganda that's fit to print." -- When it suited his purpose.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20150528/06051531134/nytimes-plays-role-keeping-fear-alive -with-pure-fearmongering-over-patriot-act-renewal.shtml
But now that it suits this Bode's purpose, different, huh?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: The REAL giveaway is referencing New York Times Magazine
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: The REAL giveaway is referencing New York Times Magazine
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: The REAL giveaway is referencing New York Times Magazine
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
TechStir
there that should bring it full circle. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Need Strong Identity Tools
That's not a panacea, for example it's still vulnerable to "long con" scenarios. But, as with all forms of security, it isn't about perfection it's about raising the costs for attackers more than raising the costs for defenders.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Need Strong Identity Tools
If someone made a plugin that would automate this, and if sites like techdirt would include signature validation, that'd be even better :)
So yeah; the tech to do what you suggest has been around as long as the corporate Internet; people just have to start using it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Putin is the result
We were still trying to detach neighbouring countries from Russia during the later Yeltsin and early Putin years.
Since 1991 (possibly slightly before) there has been no ideological reason to oppose Russia - but we have continued to do so because we recruited nationalists from the non-Russian parts of the Soviet Union to our cause during the cold war and continued to listen to them after communism fell. These people (eg Brezinski) hate Russia simply for being Russia and for no other reason. Under these circumstances it is not a surprise that Russia reacts in the way that it does.
Remember that Putin is way more popular in Russia than any western politician is in his own country so it is the Russian people we are opposing these days - not just the leadership.
Until we give up on trying to continually humiliate Russia and/or trying to force it to be like us we can expect it to continue to behave in this way - and subtlety is not a part of the way they operate.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Putin is the result
That situation needs to change for a real conversation to be had. I don't think we are getting there any time soon. For now Putin is waiting the situation out by continuously breeding an "us versus them"-mentality in the propaganda.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Putin is the result
Are you really saying that stopping "trying to continually humiliate Russia and/or trying to force it to be like us ".
is not an option?
It is precisely because we fail to do this that we are risking returning to the cold war.
I repeat - we have got so used to the idea of Russia as the enemy that we couldn't let go of it and after 20 years or so Russia has shrugged its shoulders and set - "well if you really want it that way then we can go back to that as well."
A few months ago the descendants of the "first emigration", Russians who left in the 1920s after the revolution and have lived in the west ever since wrote the following
These people are not in any sense part of Putin's propaganda army. They fled for their lives and lost most of their property as a result of the revolution. They acknowledge that Russia has changed since soviet times - its a pitty that we don't seem to be able to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Putin is the result
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Putin is the result
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is this typical now?
How do we foster good anonymous or pseudonymous discourse in the face of these kinds of attacks? Add "verified" accounts? There must be a way.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is this typical now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Is this typical now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Putin has to take some of the blame for that by poisoning the well. In the short term he gains by swaying public opinion, but in the long run we all lose because of a loss of trust. Maybe that loss of trust was inevitable and Putin was just the first to go all in on it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
I suspect Putin sees much of his power as old style - as in he can have people imprisoned and killed, and does so, and everyone knows it. This new internet thing is a potential rival power source, so if he can ruin it for everyone, he wins, because he will still maintain his violonce-based power source while his opposition will have lost their most potent weapon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
To that sentiment, I would add that tarring everyone who objects to the US sponsoring coups worldwide (eg, to take recent and salient examples, in Venezuela, Libya, Syria, Ukraine...) with the label of "Russian sympathisers" is a disgusting tactic.
I mean, what the fuck? I can't voice my objection to the US trying to start the precise inverse of the Cuban Missile crisis without being smeared as un-American?
Welcome back, McCarthyism!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Which, of course, nobody is doing. What people are pointing out is that arguing that criticizing Russia is wrong because "look what the US is doing" is a completely bullshit argument.
That's nowhere near the same as saying that people who object to US behavior are being tarred for it. They're being tarred for using US misbehavior in a discussion that is not about the US in the hopes of changing the subject away from Russia's misbehavior.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
While I disagree with this assessment, I understand that what is salient to me may not be so salient to you.
But is this invariably the case? Does a discussion of the US government's behavior never pertain to one about the Russian government's behavior?
I don't think one needs to look far to find examples.
I disagree that discussion of the Ukraine, or meta-discussions about discussions of the Ukraine (which Karl raised in his previous posting on this topic), is "not about the US". It is about the US. The US made it very much "about the US", when it decided to sponsor a coup there.
Articles like Karl's, which refer to "Russia gleefully annex[ing] the Ukraine" without breathing a word about the US's interference there which precipitated the Russian response, make relevant a discussion of US behavior.
I am puzzled why this seems to escape your notice.
Anyways, take care.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
This is not a discussion of US behavior, though. This is a discussion of the Russian propaganda machine.
"I am puzzled why this seems to escape your notice."
And I am puzzled by how it is that you don't even seem to understand what is being talked about here.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
It would be a strange commentary on a sports match that talked about the tactics of one team without ever referring to the tactics of their opposition.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Why does this puzzle you? The topic of propaganda is much broader than any single event. Why do you think that the Ukrainian situation should be a part of the conversation and not the thousands of other things that should, by the same logic, also be included?
I know why: because you are desperately trying to change the subject away from what we're talking about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Unless their English gets better, it's not too hard to spot the factory trolls. Their grammar and syntax are weird.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Nobody sure seems to have a lot to say.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This smacks of our resignation that "Politicians are corrupt. That's just the way it is."
But that doesn't justify you being a dick. It doesn't justify some guy you like being a dick. It doesn't justify the leader of your country being a dick.
That said, Putin's massive internet propaganda campaign is a total program of dicks. So is the NSA mass surveillance and spy program. They are individually dick programs and the dickness of one program doesn't make the dickness of the other program more bearable or even justifiable. It just means there's more dickery in the world than less.
If Putin wants to help he can stop dick programs and try (just try) to be less of a dick. The exact same thing can be said about Obama. The fact that Obama isn't doing that doesn't obligate Putin any less, and vice versa. The fact that other dickery is happening world wide doesn't make Putin's dickery comparitively less egregious. It just elevates the general dickery even higher.
Dickery isn't zero-sum. Stop pretending it is.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
Where's your evidence of this?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Ukraine in particular?
I'm privy to no evidence that isn't common knowledge.
Judging from other recent comments of yours, I don't expect that my interpretation of that evidence agrees with yours.
That's still allowed, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Her language is the language of one who has both the means and intent to determine outcomes. As though she were the coach of a football team.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That whole wacky Crimea affair.
And Putin responded by lining tanks along the Russian / Ukraine border and NATO pretty much had to respond to that.
So as much as the CIA loves to play agent provocateur and destabilize regimes so the US can swoop in and be savior (and then exploit the people and resources for glass beads), Ukraine is not one such situation. This one was cause primarily by those meddling USSR kids.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: That whole wacky Crimea affair.
The US invaded Iraq for no reason so that means you can't criticize Putin for taking over Crimea.
So as much as the CIA loves to play agent provocateur and destabilize regimes so the US can swoop in and be savior (and then exploit the people and resources for glass beads), Ukraine is not one such situation. This one was cause primarily by those meddling USSR kids.
It was Obama's fault, because Obama.
How am I doing?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Same stuff, different day
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Same stuff, different day
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_War_Recognition_Certificate
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Max Frankel Awards 2015
Seriously? Can't think of any other connection between the coups in Syria and Ukraine, eh Karl?
Way to go, ace reporter. You're destined for great things, surely.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Max Frankel Awards 2015
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Max Frankel Awards 2015
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Max Frankel Awards 2015
You write:
I will confess that it is not entirely clear to me what this is supposed to mean. So please forgive me while I attempt a unilateral clarification. Purely for the benefit of my own understanding.
The 40,000 rubles a month, clearly, is a reference to the Russian troll factory salary.
As for whether such a sum "covers needing to make distinctions", I take it that here you imply that you, as an impartial journalist, make no distinctions. You, the maverick independent, dare to fire your pen at will, let the ink fall where it may, and let the many-faced god sort them out.
You are impartial, and fundamentally so.
And so (again, forgive me as I lurch painfully towards what must be blindingly obvious to those not laboring under the nefarious sway of Putinesque-bene-gesserit-mind-control techniques), a Russian troll salary, or any salary for that matter, would be insufficient to sway your high principles.
Did I get that right? If so, fair enough.
You were defending yourself against a charge of bias. So let us consider your impartiality, for the sake of this discussion, established beyond doubt.
But impartiality, all on its lonesome, does not alone constitute journalism, wouldn't you agree? While remaining "impartial", in a certain sense much-practiced by mainstream American media, one can report on "both sides of a story" while at the same time omitting important historical (or even not-so-historical) context. While remaining "impartial", one can nonetheless present an account of dubious provenance as though it were on an equal footing with a more reliable account which contradicts it.
Anna Dolgov, whose name seems to headline a number of the stories you source for your own commentary, appears to be an interesting sort of journalist. Have you examined much of her other work?
Far be it from me to impugn anyone's reputation. I haven't, after all, gotten around to much investigation this week, nor do I forsee receiving any shipments of round tuit for the rest of the month.
But, you know, may I humbly suggest that you give her body of work a once-over, and see where precisely it registers on your impartiality meter?
Horse semen makes everything better.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Max Frankel Awards 2015
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Max Frankel Awards 2015
Oh, did I not make that clear?
If not, thank you for clearing it up, kind gentleperson.
My point was that Karl did not call it out, for its risible denial of the obvious. The implication was, therefore, that he approved.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Max Frankel Awards 2015
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A curt observation
Harder still was the clandestine labor of integrating code signals to the US Office of Strategic Services into her countless missives. When she couldn't work at night, it was a mother of a chore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
News Flash
Only now the situation is asymmetric, with the US and other western countries having the advantage over Russia. And that scares me. Take a country whose economy is in shambles, people feel persecuted by their former enemies, military is still strong, and a strong, unapologetic leader trying desperately to restore the nation's pride and dominance and what do you get? Nazi Germany, that's what. Hopefully Russia's actions in Ukraine are just Russia creating a buffer zone between Russia and the west, and not the Sudetenland of the 21st century.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: News Flash
The economy is not such a shambles as you suggest. I visited 2 years ago and have friends who go back and forth on a regualr basis and I can tell you that that part of your preamble is not true. It was true in the 1990s - under Yeltsin (the first time I visited) - and Putin's reversal of the economic fortunes is the main reason for his popularity. There has been a bit of a reverse since the fall in the oil price - but it has a long way to go to fall back to the dark days of the mid 90s.
The rest of what you presume is more or less right - but Russia is not Germany and so the result will not be what you say. The nearest thing to Nazism in the region is the Ukrainian government that the US supports.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: News Flash
I believe that at least with regard to Crimea Russia believes it is doing the right thing. I believe Russia fears that the threat of Ukraine joining with the west is an aggressive move seeking to tighten the screws on Russia, and it felt it had no choice but to make a show of strength. But to the west Russia's actions in Ukraine appear aggressive, imperialistic, and a dangerous sign for the future; additionally, the striking similarity between Ukraine and the Sudetenland that started WW2 resonates with many in the west and only serve to make Russia appear even more sinister. To end back at the beginning, the Cold War never ended.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: News Flash
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Be positive
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They live in a world of lies.
Without the cultural luxuries we take for granted as human nature.
They are anything but natural.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Hmm when I talk to some of my Russian friends - University lecturers in Mathematics and Physics I don't recognise your stereotype.
If you said that about the Jews you'd be rightly called anti-semitic. If you siad it about people of African origin you'd e called a racist.
What makes you think it is OK to say it about Russians?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Do you mean like these guys:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Russian_people
Grow the fuck up!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Karl, I Think You Will Be Disappointed
"Most Americans at this point are at least marginally aware of the propaganda used to sell recent wars conducted by the United States."
If the FCC or AT&T often disappoint you, you still aren't adequately prepared for the disappointment you will feel when you see results of polling the US populace to measure their knowledge.
On average, we know NOTHING. Did you see that John Oliver bit where he talks to Snowden, and Snowden (fucking hero, BTW) says "I trust that the American people will use the knowledge...yada yada..." Then, Oliver shows him interview footage of American people's familiarity with the name "Edward Snowden". They either don't have a clue who he is, or the best informed think he is tied to Wikileaks, and revealed US secrets.
I felt sooo bad for Snowden at that point. All his sacrifice, and these stupid sheep couldn't even recognize the name, let alone the political significance of what he revealed.
Then there's Congress, who repeatedly called him Eric Snowden.
No. It may not be polite or patriotic to say so (I think it is), but the US populace is clueless, ignorant, and prime examples of the lower quartile of the Dunning Kruger effect.
Polls:
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2003-09-06-poll-iraq_x.htm
http://themode ratevoice.com/121921/ten-years-later-belief-in-iraq-connection-with-911-attack-persists/
https://en.w ikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polls_about_9/11_conspiracy_theories
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Salon has the right view.
http://www.salon.com/2015/06/03/we_are_the_propagandists_the_real_story_about_how_the_new_york _times_and_the_white_house_has_turned_truth_in_the_ukraine_on_its_head/
This article is just Techdirt repeating the official story from DC as in the NYTimes. Techdirt is indeed not "way out there": it's with the neo-con / neo-liberal imperial Establishment. Doesn't matter how earnest this young puppy is: at best, he's earnestly wrong.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
As usual out_of_the_blue has no idea what he's yapping about.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Russian attempts are still light years behind the '50 Cent Party'
http://www.businessinsider.com/chinas-50-cent-party-2014-10
[ link to this | view in chronology ]