Amendment Blocking Backdoor Searches, Backdooring Encryption To Be Added To Defense Funding Bill
from the well-here-we-go dept
In the last few weeks, we've pointed out that the House of Representatives have been attaching a bunch of interesting amendments to appropriations bills to block surveillance. Last week, for example, there was overwhelming support for an amendment to an appropriations bill that would block funding from NIST (National Institute of Science and Technology) for helping the NSA or CIA undermine encryption. Other amendments blocked funds being used by the DOJ/FBI to force companies to put backdoors into encryption. Other amendments stripped out funding for warrantless use of stingrays.Now, with the focus on defense appropriations, it appears that Reps. Zoe Lofgren and Thomas Massie are pushing a repeat amendment of last year's bill to block funding for two different kinds of "backdoors" used in surveillance. You can see the amendment here.
There are two key parts to this. The first would block Defense funds from being used for so-called backdoor searches of information collected via the infamous Section 702 "upstream" collection program. We knew that the NSA felt that it was fine to sniff through these so-called "incidental" collections of information, but as we learn more and more about how they do so, the more worried we should be. These backdoor searches are a way for the NSA to spy on many people without ever needing to get a warrant -- and this amendment would block that in cases where the government is searching for information on a US person through that database of info:
Except as provided in subparagraph (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used by an officer or employee of the United States to conduct a search of a collection of communications acquired under section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1881a) in an effort to find communications of a particular United States person (other than a corporation).The second part of the amendment would block funding for having the federal government demand products have backdoors in them:
Except as provided in subsection (b), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act may be used by an officer or employee of the United States to mandate or request that a manufacturer, developer, or seller of covered products design or alter the security functions in its product or service to allow the surveillance of any user of such product or service, or to allow the physical search of such product, by any agency.There is some overlap with some of those earlier amendments we talked about from last week, but from different funding bills, so these are an important way to make sure funding for such programs doesn't continue via other channels. Last year, this was the amendment that passed overwhelmingly, surprising many in the intelligence community. And there are some indications that it has even more support this year, as more and more Representatives area aware of intelligence community abuse of surveillance powers. Unfortunately, last year, this amendment was later stripped out, but if support for it continues to grow it'll be impossible to block it forever.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: backdoor, backdoor searches, defense appropriations, encryption, funding, nsa, section 702, surveillance, thomas massie, zoe lofgren
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
if support for it continues to grow it'll be impossible to block it forever.
But I'm not sure that included either "tautology" or "IF is for children."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
impossible to block it forever -- kinda like TOR, then
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: if support for it continues to grow it'll be impossible to block it forever.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
CALEA
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: impossible to block it forever -- kinda like TOR, then
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: CALEA
It has an explicit exemption for CALEA.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
subsection (b)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That'll teach 'em to mess with JQ Public... NOT
Oh dear. I can hear the internal dialogue now....
"Damn them peacenik bastards. Looks like we're gonna hafta ratchet up the blackmail division to offset the snoop and scoop programs, if'n the lawyer pool can't find a good workaround among the "exception" clauses, Steve."
"Not to worry Sam. Those exceptions are big enough to drive Jeb Bush's Ego through, with clearance on either side of a few hundred feet. We'll just rename the built-in security breach processes to something legally appropriate and carry on without missing a step. As usual."
---
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
On a planet where more than half the governments are fascist, getting anything that prevents "business as usual" on an unanimous basis is absolutely impossible - and is, in fact, absolutely laughable.
Since the federal government and its agencies work for the International Billionaire Club, business as usual includes the perpetual, 24/7 surveillance of all who might threaten "business as usual".
This legislation will be less effective than a fly swatter in a swamp.
---
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: That'll teach 'em to mess with JQ Public... NOT
"Well, crap, congress says we can't use these dollars for surveillance. Guess we better tack another $500mm onto the black budget..."
[ link to this | view in thread ]