Infringing Game A Tabletop Award Nominee Before Disqualification
from the lost-art dept
It's the oldest argument when it comes to copyright: what promotes creative works more, strict protections for creators or liberal abilities to create and adapt associated works? These arguments are often made as a matter of theory, with some creators saying copyright protections allow for investment in creating art, whereas those who might create other things based off of those creations (fan-art/films/fiction, mashup artists, samplers, etc.) would tell you about all the art we've lost due to over-reaching protections.
Well, now we have a case where the question isn't one of theory, but of reality. The Gen Con EN World RPG Awards are given out for various categories to the best tabletop games every year. This year, one game was nominated in three separate categories. A game that was clearly a copyright infringer.
Today, one of the few awards in tabletop roleplaying games announced its 2015 award nominees. There are some really good games that are in the running for ENnies awards, but as I went over the list a different story emerged. The judges at the ENnies awards managed to not once, not twice but three times nominate Mass Effect: The Fate RPG. It is up for Best Electronic Book, Best Free Product and Product of The Year.The game was made without the permission of Electronic Arts or Bioware, who developed the original Mass Effect games. The creator of the game, Don Mappin, is well known in tabletop circles and has published games with mainstream publishers in the past. For this game, which he released for free and which has been downloaded heavily, he simply published it himself. He also contends that he hasn't violated the rules of the contest, which apparently didn't mention requiring the games to be licensed. Instead, they only required the games to be good.
The work is a labor of love and it has been downloaded extensively since its release last year. I am very public and open that it is an unlicensed product, made available free of charge and that no remuneration is to be made from its distribution. The Fate core OGL is adhered to (to the best of my ability) as well as content from Brennan Taylor of Galileo Games and their Bulldogs! product, with permission.Now, a work freely given away that is as transformative as this could be a test for whether a copyright claim would be valid, but let's not bother with that. In the current climate of copyright in our legal system, it would probably be found to be infringing, and it likely is infringing on trademark grounds as well. Fine, we'll stipulate that. But let's also consider the fact that the game has since been removed from the contest nominations and the whole backlash has caused Mapping to pull the game off his site for download.
I don't believe that I have violated any aspect of the rules for the ENnies and would hope that my work could be considered. Nor do I believe that I am "stealing" (my words) a slot for Best Product if, in the eyes of the judges, my work was, in fact, superior enough to merit inclusion over other publishers. Conspiracy theories and such aside, I am simply an industry veteran choosing to give back to the hobby I love. I hope you'll consider my work--and its merits--in that vein.
In light of the forthcoming announcement of disqualification, I will also be removing the files of my own accord. My thanks to the personnel of ENWorld and the ENnies for their assistance.And, just like that, poof, the tabletop game is gone. Save for anyone able to get a copy before this whole episode started, it might as well never have existed. An award-nominee of a game, just gone. A labor of love, as the fan-creator puts it, a labor that was plenty creative in its own rights, into the ether. One wonders how many games never even get to this point before dying on the vine, shriveled up by an over-protective copyright system that, at least some of the time, hinders the very creativity it purports to promote.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: boardgames, creativity, don mappin, ennies, gen gon, infringement, mass effect, rpg awards, tabletop games
Companies: bioware, electronic arts
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Then, no one would have given a flying damn.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Or it would have be gone, if this wasn't the internet. Luckily it is, where torrents and direct download mirrors are already available, thanks to the people who got a copy earlier and are willing to share.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
A bit confused.
Should I be calling this an anomaly or should I be celebrating the fact that this obvious thief got the slapdown he deserved? Also, is this too coherent? I'm not sure.
Thank you for all your help.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A bit confused.
You need to capitalize random words and bold random lines. Use more exclamation marks and accuse "Masnick" of something even if he didn't write the article you're responding to.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A bit confused.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A bit confused.
What did he steal? To be an "obvious" thief, you'd think you'd have to obviously have stolen something first. And to be more pointed, from who was anything stolen? The only "obvious" _victim_ with a quantifiable loss is the game creator who must now hide his work, something forged on his own time and merit, because... copyright.
All works are derivative of something before it, that's just how culture works. Under copyright law, we are simply to ignore this natural fact and set an imaginary/arbitrary goal of derivation for a work to be considered "original."
You did get one thing right and that is the implied sense of this is how the system is supposed to work. Copyright has ALWAYS been about censorship, the working model was forged in Britain centuries ago to allow the monarch to control what got mass printed and what didn't, and so the result isn't even an "abuse of copyright" but more simply the intent.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: A bit confused.
I think it's supposed to be obvious because he stole very valuable and maybe irreplaceable INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY from the hard working EA. I think now I'm supposed to say something to the effect of you pirate everything and don't want to pay for anything. (Is freetard still used? If not, let me know and I'll start using a more appropriate word.) I'm also supposed to imply you're a Google shill somehow.
Also, I think I should completely ignore your comment about how all works are derivative, so I'll do that now.
(I'm trying out the advise of the commenter above you. How'd I do?)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: A bit confused.
^^Also, add some random line breaks and carets, using them ironically without realizing they are used to indicate that something is MISSING from the original text (like intelligence). I'm sure your hero MASNICK knows all about punctuation -- being a STEALING PIRATE that works for GOOGLE -- who CONSTANTLY WHINES about how he can't make a living by giving things away for FREE. If I keep saying it enough it will eventually become TRUE and not TOTAL BULLSHIT! Don't forget to make fun of other peoples grammer and spelling errors while making plenty of error's youself!
-------------------------------------------
Better luck next time, fanboy! Don't forget your inane tag that only you think is clever!
Take a loopy tour of Techdirt.com! You always end up same place!
http://techdirt.com/
Where the fanboys troll the site with vulgar ad hom, and call anyone disagreeing "trolls"!
14:28:18[p-785-0]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: A bit confused.
Last I checked copyright infringement didn't have "slapdowns" listed as a punishment.
This is just basic CYA from the contest's organizer, no more, no less.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's the logic here, right?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
That said, I think that most of the non-corporate types at Bioware would be pretty thrilled with a good 'Mass Effect' RPG as the original Bioware crew (before they expanded and got bought by EA) were quite intimately connected to the Edmonton LARP and roleplaying scene. Fun fact: The 'Dragon Age' setting was originally conceptualized by Dave Gaider as a setting for his reboot of his 'Sovereign' LARP/boardgame which was itself derived from George RR Martins 'Song of Ice and Fire'.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not Copyright, Trademark
- The images used might actually constitute copyright infringement. They also might be transformative use.
- The text clearly is the work of the author, so there cannot be any copyright infringement there.
- The rules are actually NOT copyrightable in the first place, so it doesn't matter that he uses the fate system.
- For the rule-system, there's a trademark agreement, called the "Open Game License". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Game_License to which he adheres.
- What obviously remains is a trademark infringement towards the "Mass Effect" (and related words) trademark.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not Copyright, Trademark
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Not Copyright, Trademark
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Not Copyright, Trademark
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Alternate download link
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I think it's a fair question to ask this: If the game was so good, why was it Mass Effect? Wouldn't it have been just as successful if it didn't use the Mass Effect name, setting, races, and structure? And whatever the answer to that question is, what does that indicate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Writing a story involves coming up with a world, creating characters, making the details that make the storytelling elements consistent and thus believable, a large amount of research or familiarity if you're writing about an pre-existing world or existing characters, plotting, and then the actual writing of the words, sentences, and paragraphs that make up the story text.
Some writers are better at storytelling than they are at the act of wordsmithing. The same can be said for game creators. If you've got a great plot, but need/want to expedite the creative process, using pre-existing worlds and characters helps that along. Sometimes the plot you came up with only works within a pre-existing world and with pre-existing characters. If you've got a great game system you've created, whether it was inspired by a pre-existing world or later applied to a pre-existing world, the creation of the game system is still art, even if the world used for the setting wasn't your original creation.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
Please stop confusing this "Open Game License" to anything other than a trademark-license. In that context, the only thing it allows you is to state it's using the FATE system.
You could use the FATE system (or any other system), without agreeing to this, because game rules are not subject to copyright, but then you probably could not state it on your product.
Indeed, people are doing this: http://www.jdrp.fr/jdr/basic-199.html -- In fact (this french rpg) BaSIC has exactly the same rules as Chaosiums BRP. But it doesn't really say so..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
They say bad cases make bad law. This is one such.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re:
In other words, we're generalizing. Generalizations apply to more than one individual.
& just because someone has become established doesn't mean they can't go back to doing fan fiction if they wanted to. Their being well known or having money has zero effect on Fair Use.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"Less creative types"
So someone doing one of these things is hardly a less creative type so much a someone who does more than one is an extra creative type.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This is what happens when a fan award gets respectable
They started out as just an unofficial fannish way for the EN World blog to award prizes to games it personally thought were cool. They were fan awards, that was that. More recently, they got some corporate sponsorship and people started taking notice of them; they're sort of gradually acquiring some respectability just from the fact they've been put on at this big ceremony for so long.
If this Mass Effect thing had happened a few years ago, I guarantee you nobody would even have noticed. The whole thing was basically just Mappin wanting his fellow RPG geeks to give him some kudos for how kewl his fan game was. He never stopped to think that so many more eyes are on the awards now that kind of thing just isn't going to fly anymore.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Next up:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Game design is work.
Incidentally, given that Wizards of the Coast patented not only the CCCG (the collectable custimizable card game, in which cards are sold in randomized sets) but also the Tap mechanic, which indicates that a game mechanic can be patented. Of course, someone might challenge the patent. I resorted to When this card is in play, once per turn, you may... or As an action you may... with the number of actions alloted elsewhere.
My genre of choice was Star Trek though since I didn't want to fight with CBS, Paramount, Desilu or a teeming army of Star Trek fans about continuity details, I went ahead and genericized the game, and then expanded on the diegetic aspects until it became its own thing. Still, there are no other tabletop games that allow players to create a crew and go on TOS-style adventures, so I was tickled that that worked so well.
What interests me about this is that since he released it for free, it essentially is a fanfic game, which I've been tempted to do with Harry Potter or Firefly.
What frightens me is it seems that anytime someone gains money or recognition off of their own creative effort, it becomes a ripe target for litigation, because no creativity is allowed unless it's backed by a powerful, monied corporate interest.
And so yeah, sucks for the garage inventors and artists.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The Last Word
“Then, no one would have given a flying damn.