FBI & Homeland Security Now 0 For 41 In Predicting Imminent Terrorist Attacks On The US
from the why-does-anyone-take-them-seriously dept
I don't have cable. I almost never watch TV. I never see cable news unless someone points me to a clip online. Yet apparently, with the extended holiday weekend this past weekend, cable news went absolutely bonkers with vague, unsubstantiated claims from government officials about how everyone should be on heightened alert for an attack from ISIS:CNN has led the pack in whipping Americans into a panic over the Isis threat, running story after story with government officials and terrorism industry money-makers hyping the threat, played against the backdrop of scary b-roll of terrorist training camps. Former CIA deputy director Mike Morell ominously told CBS last week that “I wouldn’t be surprised if we weren’t sitting here a week from today talking about an attack over the weekend in the United States.” MSNBC and Fox joined in too, using graphics and maps right out of Stephen Colbert’s satirical “Doom Bunker,” suggesting World War III was just on the verge of reaching America’s shores.The Morell appearance was particularly ridiculous, with it posting during the episode the following map of "recent ISIS arrests" in the US to emphasize the bullshit claim that ISIS was already in the US and plotting attacks:
Before the weekend, Adam Johnson put together an astounding list of how Homeland Security and the FBI are 0 for 40 in their last 40 predictions for terrorist attacks inside the US -- raising serious questions about why the news media actually takes any of these "warnings" seriously. And that doesn't even get into the fact that DHS and the FBI have failed to stop actual plots like the Boston bombing. Here's the list that Johnson put together:
And now we can add this past weekend, making them 0 for 41.October 2001: “Potential use of chemical/biological and/or radiological/nuclear weapons“
November 2001: California bridges
February 2002: “Hollywood studios”
May 2002: Statue of Liberty
June 2002: “Around the Fourth of July holiday”
July 2002: Stadiums
August 2002: “Landmarks”
October 2002: “AQ to attack Amtrak”
November 2002: “Spectacular Al Qaeda attacks”
February 2003: “Apartments, hotels, sports arenas and amusement parks“
May 2003: “Possibility of multiple attacks”
May 2004: “Attempt to affect the outcome” of presidential election
July 2004: “Military facilities and large gatherings” on July 4th
August 2004: VA hospitals
January 2005: Dirty bomb
March 2005: US/Mexican border
October 2005: NYC & Baltimore subways
March 2006: “Sporting events”
June 2007: Colleges
December 2007: “Shopping malls in Chicago and LA”
November 2008: “Al Qaeda to attack transit during Thanksgiving”
November 2010: Mass transit in New York City
October 2011: “Americans in Europe” facing “commando-style AQ attack”
February 2011: “Financial institutions”
May 2011: “Threats of retaliation”
June 2011: Al Qaeda “hit list”
July 2011: “Private jets of executives” involved in drone manufacturing
September 2011: “Small planes”
September 2011: “New York City or Washington around…10th anniversary of 9/11”
September 2011: Airports
March 2012: “Terrorist hacking”
August 2012: Anarchists blowing up bridge during Tampa RNC
September 2012: “Islamic violence over movie”
August 2013: “San Fransisco on high alert”
November 2013: “cyber attacks”
April 2014: “College students abroad”
December 2014: ISIS targeting Mississippi River bridge
December 2014: ISIS “sabotaging US military personnel” over social media
April 2015: ISIS targeting “parts of California”
May 2015: ISIS targeting “military bases”
Johnson highlights three reasons why these warnings still get issued:
- The FBI has all the incentive in the world to issue warnings and no incentive whatsoever to not issue warnings. Issuing warnings has no downside, while not doing so is all downside.
- The FBI, like all agencies of the government, does not operate in a political vacuum. Emphasizing the “ISIS threat” at home necessarily helps prop up the broader war effort the FBI’s boss, the president of the United States, must sell to a war-weary public. The incentive is to therefore highlight the smallest threats. This was a feature that did not go unnoticed during the Bush years, but has since fallen out of fashion.
- It has no actual utility. What does it mean to be “more vigilant”? It’s a vague call to alertness that officials, aside from “beefing up security” by local police, never quite explain what it means. If the FBI wanted to tell local police departments to up their security of the 4th of July weekend, surely they could do so quietly, without the chair of the House Committee on Homeland Security having to go on all major networks talking over b-roll of ISIS in apocalyptic terms.
So the real question, though, is how come cable news feels the need to fall for it too? As Tevor Timm notes, all this really does is help terrorists in "terrorizing" the American public:
All of this doesn’t mean that a terrorist attack on US won’t eventually happen. Simple math tells us that, no matter the precautions taken or the civil liberties taken away, one may get through. But it is a rare event, and one which human beings have lived with throughout our history. By magnifying it and terrifying everyone, we’re only doing the terrorists’ job for them.And the cable news teams are helping this right along...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cable news, dhs, fbi, fud, homeland security, isis, terror, terror warnings, terrorists
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
The real terrorists are the FBI.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Fixed
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Never are the ideas that terrorism is more rare than perceived or that LEO are less competent than they purport entertained.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
For those that don't know, Treasure Island (and Yerba Buena) is in the middle of the Bay Bridge, so either way, you have to take it. One day, we saw an abandoned big box van (think like a large rental truck) just abandoned on the side of the bridge. Now my co-worker (and driver) is ex Marines, so when we get to the exit (on the far side of the tunnel iirc) we stop and inform the National Guard squad (oh yes, military units were EVERYWHERE) there about the abandoned van.
Well, from the loading area (and our welding/grinding/safety test area where I was mainly working that day) you could see the bridge, and the truck.
Despite there being this 'Big Terror Alert', not a single person went near that truck for about 2 hours. Then a tow-truck came and pulled it away. No investigations, no checking the truck out, making sure it was 'safe', NOTHING.
I grew up in the UK, in Liverpool, during the IRA conflict. I was at the 93 Warrington bombing (the boston bombing was a near carbon copy of it, and almost exactly 20 years later), walked past one of the bombs minutes before it went off, and known many other 'suspect package' alerts.
They did none of it. That's when I understood how much of it was just for manipulation, and emotional response encouragement.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
The truth is not welcome here!
~FBI
[ link to this | view in thread ]
James Comey: the boy who cried "Lone Wolf"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That was the 'lead' news story on all the major TV/Radio News Programs on 3 & 4 July (ABC/NBC/CBS/etc. The media fear-mongering was really bad for this year's July 4th.
Of course, they all had the mandatory video/plugs of the New York Police Dept "heroically" protecting the City from non-existent July 4th terrorist threats.
Naturally, nothing bad happened on the 4th --
but the news network on 5 July ... said absolutely nothing at all about their egregiously false warnings of possible terrorist threats. Our dominant news media are shameless propaganda branches of the government.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That's because real terrorists don't talk to the FBI.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Definition of a Terrorist
Christopher Titus, "Neverlution" (2011)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I don't think that's true. Politicians, LEOs, and the media lap it up, but I think most people are pretty indifferent about it now. What the heck can you do about yet another ill defined (or mfgr'd) terror plot or alert? Meh.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
that's right, they don't keep those numbers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Hmmmm.....
Just a coincidence I'm sure. Move along nothing to see here. Nothing "nefarious" going on according to Homeland Security.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
As a former crewbot on the show (and a good friend is competing, along with a lot of regular friends on the crew and competitors list)
(that's actually what I did before I started with the US&UK Pirate Party, safety/tech on that show)
Thanks for watching! :-)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Have about the same import as anything related to ISIS or Al Qaeda.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I recall some story...
Yeah, that's basically how it'll play out: in 5-10 years from now we'll actually have an attack and nobody will believe it when someone says it will happen.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Caution, Slippery
Except of course, when you actually slip and break your ankle! At which point your first thought goes to, "Where is that damn sign now?"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
Battlebots is great. Every episode so far has been just spectacular (though we fast forward through a lot of the hoopla preceding a match).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
DHS & FBI
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Would they announce if they actually knew?
If I were part of a terrorist organisation, I would certainly want to make use of these kinds of public announcements - plan something for nearby the announcement, so they think any specific info may have been worthwhile, just insufficient. Or plan something counter to the announcements, to lower public confidence in their "protectors".
Luckily for everyone (not least myself), I'm not part of a terrorist organisation.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
They did find perfectly preserved passports from afghan in the metal burning flames, so naturally one would then go on to the conclusion to evade and distabalise IRAQ, which is not afghan......
Almost like they got a perfect excuse to do something they planned before 9/11.......distabalising the middle east
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Cycle needs a'breaking
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Does it have to be directed against a government to be terrorism?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: 7
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mike Morrell
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Tricksie Hobbitses!!
That would make Cyber-Security FUD more believable to the gullible and put the old "fear-o-terror" back into the spines of the spineless, and cost way less than the Boston Bombing.
Just a thought. :)
---
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
So at best I suppose, that could be read as being directed against a government indirectly maybe.
The definition may have changed though.
In fact, many times.
---
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Caution, Slippery
Each of those signs marks a spot where someone fell. The sign goes up immediately after the fall and before the insurance investigation, to prove the company warned the faller of the danger, and thus prevents having to pay for damages and prevents insurance liability costs from rising.
Standard Operational Procedure.
----
[ link to this | view in thread ]
fbi
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
So was Chernobyl.
"Inside job" usually pertains to thefts where the thieves have some chance of getting away with the scheme. I don't see where anyone's gotten away with anything here, other than (so far) managing to avoid jail/execution. I doubt Cheney and Bush enjoy the fact that pretty much everybody now considers them war criminals (on par with Syria's Assad, or Idi Amin, or Serbia's Milosevic, Pol Pot, Josef Goebbels, Stalin, Gen. Tojo, Francisco Franco, Winston Churchill, ...).
[ link to this | view in thread ]