Compliant UK Press Insist 'Thousands Of Lives At Risk' If Government Can't Spy On Citizens
from the oh-really-now? dept
Earlier today we wrote about how the UK's High Court determined that the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers (DRIP) Act that passed a year ago, allowing the government wide leverage to get access to citizens' private data, was a violation of privacy, because it did not have necessary limitations. The rule is still allowed to be used for the next nine months while the court asks Parliament to fix the law (or for the government to appeal the ruling, which it's doing). Cue frantic bogus FUD from the press stenographers in the UK. The Telegraph's "Security Editor" posted a story with this ridiculous (and wrong) headline: "Thousands of lives at risk after High Court rules snooping powers unlawful."
But police chiefs and the Home Office warned that would mean officers would no longer be able to use the data to help trace vulnerable people such as those at suicide risk or missing childrenSo they need to spy on you to save you. Talk about a paternalistic authoritarian bullshit. And, actually, the article seems to raise a lot more questions about abuse of DRIP than anything else:
The power was used in around 16,000 such cases last year to “prevent death or injury in an emergency situation”, the Home Office said.First of all, 500,000 requests?!? What the hell are they searching? Second: 16,000 cases where this power was used to "prevent death or injury in an emergency situation" -- that's not even remotely believable. That's saying that law enforcement in the UK needed to snoop on citizens' private data more than 40 times every day to "prevent death or serious injury." Considering that the law only went into effect a year ago, did the number of deaths and serious injuries drop by a tremendous amount in the last 12 months, because surely there should be some evidence of that, right? Admittedly, the latest stats only go up to 2013, but if there had been a giant decrease in suicides, wouldn't someone be talking about that number, rather than the requests for information?
Under the ruling, judges or an independent body will have to sign off every one of the 500,000-plus requests to access communications data each year.
Instead, everyone's going on and on about how they're supposedly preventing suicides by spying on your:
Assistant Chief Constable Richard Berry, the National Police Chiefs’ Council lead on communications data, said: “A significant proportion of our acquisition of data relates to situations where life is at immediate risk and a significant proportion of those requests relate to non-crime enquiries, for example: tracing vulnerable and suicidal missing persons.”Of course, even if this is true (which is unlikely), are they really arguing that they need a special data retention law to make this happen? Or that they can't bother to ask a judge first? In the US, we don't have a similar data retention law, and yet companies frequently work with law enforcement to help them locate missing persons. Why do you need a broad law with little oversight unless you're planning to abuse that power in a way that companies might push back on if they weren't required by law to comply?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: data retention, drip, dripa, fud, lives in danger, suicide, uk
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Cost vs Gain
And live cameras in every room of every house, constantly watched, could probably prevent even more suicides and/or crime, yet I doubt many would consider that an acceptable cost.
Just once I'd love to see a major newspaper follow the logic these arguments are based upon to their natural conclusion, and earnestly push for it, 'A Modest Proposal' style. Cameras in every room, every conversation recorded and filed away, no matter the medium, every action carefully scrutinized and noted down.
If anything any such 'proposal' would likely not be far from what the government voyeurs actually want, even if they'd never admit it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Cost vs Gain
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Cost vs Gain
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
flip it around
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: flip it around
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Isn't this very similar to what happened with the US ruling on bulk telephone records? It's astounding that these illegal programs continue to run with impunity.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Two Days Before the Day After Tomorrow
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
That's fucking Orwellian.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The absurdity of the government's/compliant press' arguments for spying is going up to 11.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anyone get the hint??
Running around chat rooms to stop Suicides? could help someone.. Help someone get DRUGS to mellow them out, and the side affects are??? Suicide.
Privacy is a 2 way street..
IF you want OUR INFO, we get to HAVE YOURS..
Every paper, fax, Net, Promise you make..
WHO do you think they are monitoring??
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
you know the argument is going to be, is lets have less privacy,less civil rights,
less internet freedom,or free speech,
the us government has been hacked multiple times ,in the last year,
Probably by china.
more surveillance= more data as a potential target for hackers.
There,s 1000s of poor people or old people who don,t use smartphones
or have broadband .
DO those people not get lost or have problems that put them at risk .
This is like the awful sunday times article on snowden
leaks ,
it could have been written by a government pr hack.
it makes no sense,
its just a call for more surveillance powers for the government .
WE have no big surveillance system in ireland ,
theres other ways of helping people who get lost or who
are at risk of suicide
apart from mass surveillance .
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Prevent Suicide
Recently I threatened suicide to my local MP as a result of Camerloons suggestion that he was going to ban or backdoor encryption. I gave a date and the method and cc'd the message to local Plod on .pnn.police.uk
Nothing happened. Fortunately/Unfortunately I did not catch the bus. Casper Bowden popped his clogs on my given day. Fair enough I am a coward but whilst I had only met him via Twitter I had no idea just how brilliant the man was.
Perhaps my mistake was to tell my MP and Plod to their faces that I was about to top myself. I should have relied on them intercepting my communications.
Bollocks!
Not Dave
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]