And Now Here Comes Every Other Comic Convention With Trademark Apps For The Generic 'Comic Con'
from the you-guys-aren't-getting-it dept
Roughly a year ago, we brought you the very dumb story of the San Diego Comic-Con suing Don Farr Productions, organizers of the Salt Lake City Comic Con, for trademark infringement. If ever there were a classic case of a trademark that had moved into a generic status, "comic-con" and similar iterations would have to be it. There are comic cons everywhere. In the midst of all this, or perhaps because of it, the Salt Lake City Comic Con applied for its own trademark over its name, which, again, ought to have been denied as being too generic in my opinion. The USPTO, in its infinite wisdom, disagreed, granting them the mark as the trademark suit is still going on. You already know what happened next, don't you?
Yup, every other comics convention that uses comic con, the term so generic that everyone effing uses it, is now lining up at the USPTO's door to get their own trademarks.
This week sees the kick-off of this year’s Boston Comic Con. Which seems a good a time as any to register the trademark for the name for “Organizing and conducting conventions, exhibitions, and gatherings for entertainment purposes and in the fields of artwork, animation, comic books, fantasy, gaming, popular culture, science fiction, and television and film” and for “Comic books, commemorative comic books, posters, commemorative posters” and “T-shirts, commemorative T-shirts.”And unless this is stopped tout de suite, there's absolutely no reason to expect that all the other comic cons in all the other cities will be filing their applications soon. Why wouldn't they? The USPTO, in conjunction with a lawsuit over a term that hasn't yet been ruled generic, but should be, have thrown open the door for everyone to get their piece of the generic pie. And the end result of all of this? Tons of billable hours, of course.
They are not alone. Rhode Island Comic Con and Kansas Comic Con have also launched trademark bids in the past month. ‘Tis the season… they may be inspired by the attempts and claims of Salt Lake Comic Con. Denver Comic Con also has a trademark registration.
They can expect a challenge from Comic-Con International, the organisers of San Diego Comic-Con and WonderCon, who own the trademarks on San Diego Comic-Con, Anaheim Comic-Con, San Francisco Comic-Con and Los Angeles Comic-Con.Why? Why? Why pay a legal team to spend a ton of time and money fighting for a mark that doesn't threaten you, that has become generic, and that has been employed the entire time your own mega-popular convention has become insanely successful. Why are we doing any of this?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Lawyers and idiot examiners.
Lawyers for conning their clients into thinking that if they don't file for a trademark someone else will, and they'll be forced to stop using the ludicrously generic 'Comic-con' name, leading to tons of billable hours no matter what happens, and idiot examiners for not doing 30 freakin' seconds of research and noticing that the two words are used everywhere, meaning it is well past the point where anyone should get a trademark on it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Mega - Cons seem to have run their course for avg. joes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not worth going to them
In 2012 we had Bruce Schneier, in 2013 the ACLU's Chris Soghoian, last year we had Kurt Opsahl of the EFF, and this year it's a mixture of EFF, Accessnow, and public knowledge, as well as our regular hackers, cryptographers, and lawyers.
Our panels are meant to be more for the 'interested' rather than the expert, of course, and aim to cover as many topics as we can, so while Mike or Glyn might not learn much, many should. (and yes, I've asked Mike if he's interested in being a Guest before, but he couldn't make last year).
Hotels are going to be hard to find (all 5 host hotels each sold out within 15 minutes - not easy for 5 thousand-bed hotels at $240/night but there are overflow ones around, and MARTA.
So come if you can, and if you do, say 'hi', I'm the British guy making the track work!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
plus lawyers ,plus stupid examiners =more money for the system,
america has too may lawyers .
= more court cases,
comic cons are in most countrys now,
its a generic term used where pop culture sf fans tv fans meet up ,
you may as well trademark bake sale or church meeting .
get around this have say boston Comiccon =1 word.
people will still go to it .
Patent examiners should not allow patents on colours eg blue or generic words in common use .
the word comic con is used by everyone .
refuse any patent,trade mark on it .
am i gonna hold a con in new jersey and call it san diego con,
thats unlikely .
[ link to this | view in thread ]
what to do
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The snowball continues to roll downhill...
Ah the joys of legal insanity.
---
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I didn't think the difference was all that subtle but apparently some people have a hard time distinguishing.
The error you are pointing out is an example of a typo not inaccurate reporting.
I suggest you bookmark it for future reference.
Hope this helps.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Because they don't pay a legal team explicitly to spend a ton of time and money fighting useless stuff. The legal team is normally paid to keep legal threats away and collect on dues, but the legal team often strong-arms their way into dumb shit like this to rake in extra billable hours.
[ link to this | view in thread ]