Techdirt Reading List: Larry Lessig's Republic, Lost
from the worth-a-read dept
We're back again with another in our weekly reading list posts, of books we think our community will find interesting and thought provoking. Once again, buying the book via the Amazon links in this story also help support Techdirt.As you've probably heard by now, Larry Lessig is may be running for President if he's able to raise $1 million by the end of this weekend -- positioning himself as a 100% referendum candidate focused on political corruption and money in politics. His plan is to pass campaign finance reform, and then resign from the Presidency. He's currently right around $750,000, which makes me think he'll make it over the line with a last minute bump.
I'm still not entirely sure what I think of the campaign. As I said in my original post about it, it feels gimmicky and a little nutty. Others have raised more serious concerns, some of which Lessig just tried to respond to, which is worth a read. However, equally worth reading is Lessig's 2011 book about money in politics (and how to fix it): Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress--and a Plan to Stop It.
As with the fundamentals of Lessig's campaign, I don't agree with the entire book, and I still worry about the serious unintended consequences that may occur based on campaign finance laws that sound good, but may create free expression concerns. That said, Lessig still makes a very compelling argument about just how corrupt the system really is, and how that undermines nearly everything in government. At the very least, if you're considering supporting Lessig (or, even hating on Lessig), you at least owe it to yourself to read his book, in which he lays out his ideas in a very thorough manner. And, yes, if you don't wish to buy the book from Amazon, Lessig also allows for free downloads from his own website, though (obviously) getting it that way doesn't help support Techdirt.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: corruption, larry lessig, money in politics, reading list, republic lost, techdirt reading list
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Yeah, that's one of the most important points that almost nobody understands. The Constitution states that the Government is established and organized by We The People. If it's someone else--anyone else--establishing and organizing our government, then the entire system breaks down, because that is literally the most fundamental principle that the entire system is built upon.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
p.s. Lessig's actual proposals carefully avoid restricting free expression: http://republic-lost.org/chapter-16-reforms-that-would-reform.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Okay, I've read enough Lessig. When your first chapter glosses 20th century history without mentioning "capitalists" as central problem, it's definitely WRONG.
It's NOT "good souls, corrupted", it's "EVIL SOULS, EMPOWERED BY TOO MUCH MONEY". ... That's just basic human nature. Only way I can explain the blindness of young and/or privileged people like Lessig to that basic fact is they've never actually known hardship, had to slave away to enrich someone else, or come face to face with people who delight in arbitrary power. Sheer evil is easily visible today when police shoot people for no cause. That's what The Rich do full time, only they have more resources and can hide their crimes because own the media. All wars, including the class war, start with The Rich; they're the only ones who profit from wars.
Oh, and second chapter starts on bisphenol-A (think that's right for BPA), which is likely dangerous, but WHAT THE HELL IS IT DOING in a political screed?
"Why don't we have free markets?" -- Because The Rich OWN THE MARKETS.
Lessig is a nutter, but since doesn't blame The Rich, Masnick thinks he just may be profound.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Okay, I've read enough Lessig. When your first chapter glosses 20th century history without mentioning
Even if you think it's horrible you should at least not advocate for something demonstrably worse than capitalism
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Okay, I've read enough Lessig. When your first chapter glosses 20th century history without mentioning
The best systems tend to be ones that are more moderate; systems that have social safety nets, regulations to dissuade externalizing costs to the commons or others. I think, for example, that you would agree public roads, walkways, plumbing and even power systems are generally quite beneficial and necessary to a modern standard of living. The same is true for other 'basics' within a system. There are simply some elements that are too urgent, or based on physical locality, for competition to be an effective solution at an end user level. For other systems competition is better focused on various contractors servicing a platform's needs.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: the best systems.
I've always though of capitalism as the "least evil" system as well. (I assume from context, the flagged comment said something about that- can't see it due to no-script)
If there's arguably better systems out there I'd like to learn about them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: the best systems.
You can have markets and competition without private ownership of basic resources. And we can have completely dysfunctional market failure and monopolies while having everything be privately owned, i.e. capitalism.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]