Telco Giant Vodafone Looked At Journalist's Phone Records To See Who Was Leaking Info To Her
from the that's-illegal dept
Down in Australia, it appears that phone giant Vodafone is facing a bit of a scandal as it's come out that the company went digging into a journalist's phone records after she wrote some stories about security flaws in a Vodafone system. Remember, a decade ago, when there was a big scandal at HP, when it spied on board members to try to stop leaks? That was bad. This is worse. This is directly violating a customers' privacy, just because you're upset about some leaks.In a 2012 email from then Vodafone Hutchison Australia head of fraud Colin Yates to then Vodafone global corporate security director Richard Knowlton, Mr Yates warns of the “huge risk” to the company if a string of allegations — which he “has no reason to believe” are not factual — “gets into the public domain”.You can see the story by O'Brien here, in which she revealed that people could access Vodafone customer information, because a source she was talking to had the password to the company's database. This resulted in an investigation by Australia's Privacy Commissioner into Vodafone's security practices. Meanwhile, Vodafone tried to play the whole thing down as a "one-off incident" of someone abusing the password to the system.
Of particular concern to Mr Yates was the hacking of the “call charge records and text messages” from the mobile of Fairfax investigative reporter Natalie O’Brien, then a Vodafone customer.
On January 10, 2011, the day after O’Brien broke a story about major security flaws with Vodafone’s Siebel data system — including that private call records could be illegally accessed — Vodafone investigators had discussions about searching her phone records to find the Vodafone sources for the story.
Meanwhile, in the background, they were abusing their own systems to try to figure out who was talking to O'Brien -- and were admitting internally that they were misrepresenting the real situation publicly:
Following her story, Vodafone executives allegedly “told the press, the NSW Privacy Commissioner and other high-profile Australian agencies that the breach was a one-off incident”.Investigating a privacy breach by breaching the privacy of the reporter who exposed it is... perhaps not the proper response.
Mr Yates wrote to Mr Knowlton: “As you know this is in fact not the case and VHA has been suffering these breaches since Siebel went live and did nothing or very little to close off the weaknesses that allowed them to occur.”
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: australia, journalism, leaks, natalie o'brien, privacy, security, sources, spying
Companies: vodafone
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Oh, it's absolutely the proper response if you're trying to scare people out of whistleblowing and reporting on the issues thus uncovered. Whether or not it's the moral response, Vodafone clearly just doesn't care. :(
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lesson learned, maybe
Not that Vodafone should do this or be in the clear for it, but that's the first thing I take away from this story.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Lesson learned, maybe
The best leaks are done by "sneaker net".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
let me clarify
I have'nt.
P.S.
Close one
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Taking bets this is ANOTHER Newscorpse type scandal where normal phone 'advisors' regularly go through celebrities phone records for shits n giggles.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"from the that's-illegal dept"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "from the that's-illegal dept"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: "from the that's-illegal dept"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It wasn't just about spying. It was about putting pressure on reporters to avoid bad press. As Groklaw put it:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Privacy, Piracy, what's the difference?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]