Auto Industry's Own Study Demolishes Case For Car Safety Harmonization In TAFTA/TTIP
from the putting-lives-in-danger dept
Back in February, we suggested that TAFTA/TTIP should really be called the "Atlantic Car Trade Agreement," or ACTA for short, since nearly 50% of the claimed boost to transatlantic trade that would accrue from TTIP consists of swapping vehicles between the US and EU. The claim was that, since cars made in the US and EU were equally safe, there was no good reason why they could not be sold on both sides of the Atlantic. According to an important article in The Independent, proponents of this view were so confident that US and EU safety standards were broadly similar that they commissioned a report to prove it, with the aim of using it to bolster the case for harmonizing car safety standards in TAFTA/TTIP:
The Washington-based Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers (AAM) sponsored the research, announced in a joint press release last year alongside the European car lobby ACEA and the American Automotive Policy Council.
So that there could be no question about the validity of the results, they asked some of the world's top people in the field to participate:
Independent experts from the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute and the SAFER transportation research centre at Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden, carried out the study. They are two of the leading traffic safety research centres in the world. Experts in France and at the UK’s Transport Research Laboratory were also involved.
Here's what the industry's report found:
The research actually established that American models are much less safe when it comes to front-side collisions, a common cause of accidents that often result in serious injuries.
The following is no surprise, then:
The findings were never submitted -- or publicly announced -- by the industry bodies that funded the study.
Putting a brave face on things, a spokesperson for the US Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers told The Independent:
"There is much credit to be given for the historic efforts made in this study, and we fully support the methodology for comparing and analyzing U.S. and EU crash environments and vehicle performance. "
While the European car manufacturers association said:
"ACEA remains confident that regulatory convergence can be achieved in TTIP while maintaining the current high level of safety performance in both the EU and the US"
But the European Transport Safety Council (ETSC), the independent organization that advises the European Commission and the European Parliament on road safety, is not so sure. Its executive director, Antonio Avenoso, is quoted as saying:
"This study shows that EU and US trade negotiators would potentially be putting lives in danger by allowing vehicles approved in the US to be sold today in Europe and vice-versa. … Clearly without much more research and analysis, including vehicle safety standards in the TTIP agreement would be irresponsible."
The trouble is, if car safety standard harmonization is not included in TTIP, there won't be the big boost to trade that is predicted to come from increased transatlantic vehicle sales. And without that big boost, TAFTA/TTIP's benefits, never very big in the first place, become even more negligible. Sounds like it's time to slam the brakes on ACTA….
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: automobiles, cars, eu, international agreements, safety standards, tafta, trade, trade agreements, ttip, us
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Study? What study?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Seems Unfair To Discard A Theory Because Of One Unfortunate Data Point
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Seems Unfair To Discard A Theory Because Of One Unfortunate Data Point
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Aaaand they won't care.
Business is business and people are ants.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Aaaand they won't care.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Glyn Moody shame on you
JK, Glyn Moody for President 2016
Capt ICE Enforcer (RETIRED)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Glyn Moody shame on you
Hey, quit trying to pinch him, as we need him to be the next prime minister.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Stabbed in the back by the facts...
If it is, is it safer to say it in the EU than the US?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
curious for more detail
I'd be really curious to see what vehicles and model years are covered by the tests.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]