Why Does The Press Have To Keep Fixing All Of Comcast's Screw Ups?
from the sisyphean dept
By now you probably know the drill: Comcast will do something incredibly stupid, and a customer that has been struggling to get the company to fix it for a year (or longer) will have absolutely no luck getting the issue resolved. They'll subsequently contact the media out of frustration and (especially if the screw up goes viral) Comcast will finally resolve the problem -- usually within a day. The company then trots out claims that this is simply an "anecdotal" experience and not representative of the great care and skill with which it manages its beloved customers. Rinse, wash, repeat.The latest story of this type comes from a Comcast customer of eight years who was incorrectly over-billed for service by the cable company. Not recognizing its own error, the company also sent collection agencies after the customer to obtain money never actually owed them. And, as always, the user attempted for eighteen months to get Comcast to realize its screw up to no avail:
"I called Comcast a total of 10 times beginning 5/31/2014 and wasted at least 10 hours of my life trying to fix a problem that they created,” Mueller told Ars. “In making those calls I was hung up on, transferred, and dismissively told to just wait it out.” The problem was seemingly fixed in November 2014, yet almost exactly one year later Mueller got a letter from another collection agency. More calls to Comcast this month didn’t fix the problem immediately, and Mueller contacted Ars out of frustration."A problem that never should have happened in the first place? Check. Apathetic and incompetent support? Check. Being forced to contact the press in the hopes somebody can light a fire under Comcast's ass? Check. It's not hyperbole to state that this sort of thing happens weekly in news outlets all over the country, and the negative public sentiment and press generated by this incompetence lambada was a big reason regulators scrapped the company's attempted acquisition of Time Warner Cable. Even magician and top Comcast lobbyist David Cohen couldn't fix what was broken.
Of course, as the story always goes, once the press was contacted it was a trivial problem for Comcast to fix:
"It blows me away that the burden is on me to fix their mistake and that it is taking so much of my resources,” Mueller told us. “I really would like to bill them for my time.” Mueller was also worried the collection agencies' involvement would harm his credit rating. After talking to Mueller, we reached out to our contacts in Comcast’s public relations group on Thursday last week. A Comcast spokesperson researched the issue, and the very next day someone else from Comcast called Mueller to tell him that the problem was fixed for good."Why, after a decade of stories like this, is the press still responsible for fixing Comcast's screw ups? Because Comcast customers are either too lazy to switch, or don't have an adequate TV or broadband service to switch to. And as the industry continues to consolidate into just a handful of players (AT&T buys DirecTV, Charter buys Time Warner Cable and Bright House), the incentive to compete on both fronts decreases further as geographic dominance grows. These giant, publicly traded companies then usually look to customer service budget cuts first when trying to please Wall Street with relentlessly better quarter over quarter results.
To be fair, after the merger fracas Comcast is trying some new support tricks, though whether they'll ever materialize as wholesale improvements is uncertain. In Portland Comcast is experimenting with a pilot program that tries to reach out to customers before problems are even detected by them. This is all being spearheaded by a "Customer Experience" VP who was hired last year with one, full-time purpose: to stop Comcast from sucking.
The problem is, no matter how many times this pattern has repeated over the last decade, Comcast never seems to get any better at its job. Claims that it recognizes its own dysfunction and promises to improve are now a yearly phenomenon for Comcast, yet customer satisfaction studies never budge. It's pathetic that it takes press intervention to routinely fix fairly basic mistakes that balloon into legendary annoyance; if Comcast can't get its household in order perhaps it can start paying those folks (be it Reddit users or the media) who keep having to play the middle man.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: broadband, customer service, press coverage
Companies: comcast
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Short term vs Long term costs
Putting out PR fires like this may cost more in the short term, but it's a single cost, once the problem is solved, that's it.
It's cheaper for them to have abysmal service and just deal with the problems that go public than it would be to improve their customer service enough so that such problems don't happen in the first place.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Short term vs Long term costs
Until they have an irrevocably bad, inexorably horrible reputation that can never be changed in the mind of the public.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Short term vs Long term costs
Introduce some real competition into the market, and only then will they start to care about keeping their customers happy.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Short term vs Long term costs
Within 2 years no one remembers who they were.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Short term vs Long term costs
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Probably because Comcast is spending its time trying to convince the world to redefine the word "lobbyist".
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Poke that Bear
Cue the email stating that the Sr. Comcast Lobbyist David Cohen is not a lobbyist!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Poke that Bear
Cue the email stating that Comcast has NOT screwed up. This incident is consistent with Comcast's uniquely well known industry-leading reputation for customer service.
And that David Cohen is not a magician. Money and magic are not the same thing when it comes to congress.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Pain Point
If his wife blogs about how bad their Comcast service is, the broadband service department contacts her the following day and resolves it by the end of the week. Individual customer complaints do not cause the same pain for them as any sort of bad press.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What is the incentive
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: What is the incentive
I had to go to Ars' article to find out what service was involved: "business internet service". Assuming the last mile delivery was fiber what other options did he have? Businesses usually need higher levels for speed, bandwidth, and uptime than regular consumers, even those that stream 3-4 hour videos every day. If consumers have few (or no) options what options do businesses have?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Techdirt Inaccuracy, Again
"Rinse, wash, repeat," my foot. How dare you besmirch the good name of Comcast with these claims?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Techdirt Inaccuracy, Again
The phrase *I've* always heard is "lather, rinse, repeat".
My Alex Trebek deed for the day. Can I go home now?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Techdirt Inaccuracy, Again, NOT
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Techdirt Inaccuracy, Again
Instead, he should be correctly referred to as "don't call him a lobbyist" David Cohen.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They are all about Customer Aquisition not Customer Retention
They want to keep growing. Note that it is hard to get away from the wonderful sounding "new customer" plans; however, once a customer the continuous rounds of price increases in continuous pressure to add new services.
They seem to want to skip the maturity phase where customer retention is key. They don't do anything to keep their customer happy, especially where there is very little in the way of competition.
At some point maybe they will begin to notice that the customer base is not growing anymore and they will need to start paying attention to retaining customers with retention specials and start reducing the new customer specials.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They are all about Customer Aquisition not Customer Retention
They have nowhere to go...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: They are all about Customer Aquisition not Customer Retention
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why Does The Press Have To Keep Fixing All Of Comcast's Screw Ups?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Think about it, if they grow to be an international conglomerate, they will probably acquire a number of media outlets and then when the media is fixing their problems, it will actually be Comcast doing it!
I don't understand why we are preventing them from growing large enough to become better at serving their customers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They could layoff 95% of their support personnel and shutdown their inbound support phone lines. They would save millions of dollars a month immediately.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
So...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I was quoted at almost the exact same price for almost the exact same service. I would get a marginally better price for one or two years if I signed a contract, but the post-promotion price was almost the same.
Is it considered lazy not to switch? Am I cynical to believe my customer service experience isn't going to be that much better with Century Link anyway?
And also, if Century Link can afford these promotional prices, why on earth can't they offer me that price permanently (well, adjust for inflation yearly, as is typical for these companies)?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Australia
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Australia
Well, naturally they'll don't need to retain all customer service personnel (after all, they have the same combined amount of customers as previously), so they'll take a look at which customer service is most efficient and will take the service that handles most calls per time.
Of course, that metric makes actually solving a problem not much of a priority. It takes longer and does not lead to followup calls.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
He has a choice.
So move.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: He has a choice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: He has a choice.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: He has a choice.
Nope, obviously it's his fault for not expecting Comcast to be so incompetent, and either not moving away or not moving in to an area that they have an effective if not actual monopoly in.
/s
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
David Cohen
Allegedly.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The problem is the corporate culture of comcast, not their software or how reps phrase shit to customers.
Until comcast stops treating people like cash cows to be milked and begins treating them like customers whose needs matter... nothing will change.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To save everyone else the trouble of figuring this out, I get very quick and personal attention from Comcast customer service when I use this page for cable problems, this page for telephone problems, this page for Internet problems, and this page for all my other problems.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Better customer service links
customer service page.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Also we told him to fuck off, and informed his neighbours that he's running a paedophile website. (both are things Comcast has done previously in revenge for customer complaints)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]