Montana Newspaper Decides To Just Delete Old Comments After People Get Upset About Plans To Reveal Their Names
from the well,-that's-one-solution dept
A few weeks ago, we wrote about a plan by the Montana Standard newspaper to change its commenting policy, publishing the "real names" of any commenters. While we generally think that's a silly policy for a variety of reasons, the real problem was that it was retroactively applying it to all old comments, despite clearly telling earlier commenters that their names would not be revealed (and potentially violate the newspaper's own privacy policy). In its defense, the newspaper insisted that (1) anyone who wanted otherwise could contact the paper and have their comments deleted and (2) that while it might have liked to have only applied the policy to new comments after January 1, its content management system wouldn't allow that. Of course, while that seems like something that, perhaps, should be fixed by the newspaper, I can understand that it might not have the resources to do so.Now, after there was a public outcry over all of this, the newspaper has come up with what it considers to be a compromise: It will just delete all its old comments, rather than reveal who posted them (thanks to Paul Levy for making me aware of this). Then, going forward, comments will be under the new rules.
Because of certain limitations in our web site’s content management system, The Standard initially announced that unless we received requests from individual commenters for previous comments to be removed, earlier comments would as of Jan. 1 be displayed with real names.I like how they claim that they are concerned about it, when the truth is that they seemed ready to push forward with those changes until they suddenly started getting called out for them. Either way, this response seems better than revealing everyone's names, but still seems fairly ridiculous. It also means that a whole bunch of old comments -- some of which may have been valuable -- will now disappear from the newspaper's site. Would it really have been that hard to fix their content management system instead?
We are concerned that such a change would not be fair to those who are either unaware of the pending change or have not contacted us.
So instead, all comments in the system as of Dec. 31 will be removed, and going forward, on Jan. 1, all new comments will be posted with real names in accordance with the Standard’s new policy.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: comments, deleting, privacy, real names
Companies: montana standard
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Real Reason
It's as simple as that.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The memory hole
But c'mon. Fake names and Facebook are like peanut butter and jelly. Do they really expect that to work any better?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yeah, not acceptable. Not everyone who ever commented on the site would know about these plans and could be negatively affected by the reveal before they knew about it. There's also the fact that not everybody would be in a position to complain (people who have died since the comments were posted, people who are otherwise incapacitated or incarcerated).
I accept their excuse that there's a technical reason why they couldn't apply the change only to new comments but it's definitely better to remove the old comments. That's free added value provided by the community, so they shouldn't get to keep that value while violating a promise made to the community at the time it was created.
"Would it really have been that hard to fix their content management system instead?"
Chances are it's an off-the-shelf product or an expensive bespoke system they have no in-house ability to modify. They possibly don't even have access to the source code, although that's a wild guess.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: The memory hole
Yeah, although Facebook's policy seems changeable, it's not enforced particularly well. I'm personally friends with 2 couples who use a single account with a combined version of both their names. I also have 3 dogs and one building as "friends", and I had a second account at one point based on Snake Plissken that I used for testing games when I used to work for a social games company. Unless you're doing something particularly odious, they don't seem to enforce much.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The memory hole
Actually not true.
http://usa.greekreporter.com/2015/04/11/facebook-threatens-to-delete-accounts-of-orthodox-clerg y/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: The memory hole
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Hello Leon Trotsky,
You have successfully created a user account at mtstandard.com.
Thank you, and welcome to mtstandard.com
mtstandard.com Staff
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: The memory hole
[ link to this | view in thread ]
subterfuge?
Or are we to believe that the wisemen running the paper were just total idiots who never saw it coming?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: The memory hole
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: The memory hole
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Fixing the Unfixable
Changing the former would depend on the system and its flexibility and just what exactly they wanted to change about it. If it couldn't be changed in the way they wanted themselves then either they would have to try to persuade the system's owners ro provide them with a custom version or they would have to go out and buy a new version which had the features they wanted.
Either way it would all cost $$$. And who wants to spend $$$ when the far simpler and much cheaper solution would be to throw the unwanted baby out with the bathwater and start afresh?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
That could make reading through old threads very, very confusing and make life difficult in the future if they needed to find out who originally posted the comment for any reason.
The easiest way would probably to have a rule in the CMS when it displays the comments. Those made before 1st Jan 2016 have the original anonymised name, those after get the real name displayed.
But, that could still lead to some issues (say, if a bug caused the wrong name to be displayed) and might cost money to have implemented as an option. Hence, they just delete the lot instead.
"retains the important part of the prior comments: the text, not the attribution."
Attribution is still very important, especially if something becomes a legal matter.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Make it useless and nobody will care if it goes away
a. phase out their comments section and the need for moderation, "naturally", by making posters identify themselves first, which will quickly eliminate any meaningful comments and thus make the comments section redundant and pointless...
b. eliminate the threat of hostile demands by government spies for identification of posters suspected to be drug dealers, terrorists, dissidents, child molesters, conspiracy nutters, hoarders, intellectuals, bed-wetters, or any of the government's myriad bad-guys known to be hiding out among the American Public, by preventing posters without the means of creating a false id, from posting anything.
---
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I'm Not Surprised
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Make it useless and nobody will care if it goes away
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Make it useless and nobody will care if it goes away
Didn't actually leave them out ... I just assumed the CIAF BIN SADOJ had already hired all the 'basement dwelling pud pullers' for the (public-surveillance) Hydra, (create-a-terrorist) Wizard of Oz, and (drone-assassination) Chicken Little programs.
---
[ link to this | view in thread ]