New Zealand's Raid On Investigatory Journalist Was Illegal
from the all-these-raids dept
Back in the fall of 2014, we wrote about a highly questionable police raid on the home of Nicky Hager, a well-known journalist who had published powerful pieces criticizing the government (and who was working on some investigations concerning the Snowden documents and New Zealand's involvement in mass surveillance). The wonderful Freedom of the Press Foundation (who helped raise funds for Hager's legal defense) has now alerted us to the fact that the raid on Hager's home was deemed illegal by New Zealand's High Court:The judge found that the search was illegal. He said that the Police had failed to disclose relevant information to the Judge who issued the warrant. As a result, he formally declared that the warrant was “fundamentally unlawful”. He also found that the search was therefore unlawful. Justice Clifford also expressed concerns about other aspects of the Police’s actions.This reminds me of the raids on Kim Dotcom's house as well, which involved a bogus warrant. Though, in that case, the High Court, after admitting that the warrants were not drafted properly, decided they were "good enough." Either way, those are the only two law enforcement raids in New Zealand, and both came under sketchy circumstances, where the police couldn't be bothered to actually follow the rules. What's going on down there?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: journalism, new zealand, nicky hager, privacy, protecting sources, raid, warrants
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The rights of the citizens are only as good as the penalties imposed when they are trampled, far to often the penalty seems to be a tsk tsk tsk don't do it again rather than an actual punishment in line with the severity of the rights trampled.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
But this is politics: If you act first and let the legal questions wait, you will violate innocents, while if you ask questions first, you will let guilty people go free. Politicians define instructions on how agressive the implementation should be.
By "assumption of innocence" you should be protected against these kinds of things. But politically the world has turned towards "safety first", then "assumption of innocence".
Or in strategy: Since "think of the children", "tough on crime" and "fight terrorism" are so strong paroles, the politicians would rather take responsibility for too aggressive enforcement than giving political opponents ammunition for using them!
In the end this question is also a symptom of mainstream media being biased - understandably so - towards bigger headlines and less towards a more balanced coverage. An example is the coverage of a crime: It starts with someone getting arrested, which is heavily covered in the press, then a long time of only huge court cases making media stories as they happen and ultimately the ruling is covered generally. All mitigating factors are removed and since many do not differ betweeen being arrested and being sentenced, most cases will look like either an evil getting punished or an evil escaping justice. Mainstream journalism today are horrible at covering crime reporting in a balanced way or with deep and diverse enough angles. Same generally goes for geopolitical coverage where it often gets into "us versus them" instead of more analysis of what is dividing them and what the sides are generally acting against/for.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
In high court, people are always innocent so they are let go - some of them go to Mexico and order pizza while getting drunk and ogling strippers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
I believe the French used a guillotine at one point.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
I really hope no one today is seriously looking to those times as inspiration.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Genuflection
The New Zealand government as a junior member of the Five Eyes global surveillance program overseen/funded by the US and British governments must genuflect upon command or lose the "privilege" of participating in the program.
From Wikipedia:
Five Eyes
In the late 1990s, the existence of ECHELON was disclosed to the public, triggering a major debate in the European Parliament and, to a lesser extent, the United States Congress. As part of efforts in the ongoing War on Terror since 2001, the FVEY further expanded their surveillance capabilities, with much emphasis placed on monitoring the World Wide Web. The former NSA contractor Edward Snowden described the Five Eyes as a "supra-national intelligence organisation that doesn't answer to the known laws of its own countries".[6] Documents leaked by Snowden in 2013 revealed that the FVEY have been spying on one another's citizens and sharing the collected information with each other in order to circumvent restrictive domestic regulations on surveillance of citizens.[7][8][9][10]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Eyes
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
I propose a pilot project. Once we've seen a few from Goldman Sachs, Lehman Bros., and the Fed go through the process, we can evaluate the result. Until then, I'll just sit here waiting, wishing I had some cake.
I am not going to soon forget what those bastards pulled. I do want to see heads roll.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
With punishments like that, who needs rewards?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
At the very least, it sounds like a better plan than sharpening up the ol' French National Razors.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
De-fund it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
"Here's my plan for what I will do with Wall Street when I am president:
Break up huge financial institutions in the first year of my administration."
Breaking news:
President Mason Wheeler was killed today; only days after his State of the Nation address announcement that he would be fielding legislation to break up all the huge US financial institutions, when his bulletproof limousine was crushed by Boeing 747 flight 215 out of Kansas, that literally dropped out of the sky directly on top of the president's car as he and his entourage waited for a street light on 35th avenue, in Boston. There were no survivors.
Rooters
---
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Genuflection
Order of the Realm:
Hierarchy of The English Speaking White Guys Club
Great Britain --------------- Director
United States of America - Operations
Canada ---------------------- Technology
Australia -------------------- Ways and Means
New Zealand ---------------- Wet-work
---
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Genuflection
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Genuflection
[ link to this | view in thread ]