Do The 'Smart Cities' Of Tomorrow Really Want Fraud-Plagued, NSA Pal AT&T As A Partner?
from the with-friends-like-these... dept
AT&T this week is running its Developer Summit alongside of CES, and the telco's biggest announcement is that it's working closely with Chicago, Atlanta and Dallas to be their preferred partner in their quest to become the "smart cities" of tomorrow. In pretty typical "Internet of Things" parlance there's more flourish than substance to the announcement, but AT&T claims they're working on solutions that will integrate nearly ever part of a city with AT&T's network -- from utility meters and city maintenance systems to transportation computers and even law-enforcement gunshot detection systems:Cities can better manage traffic patterns of pedestrians at stadiums, parks, and busy intersections. Gun fire detection technology helps law enforcement know where a shooting occurred. It also helps them determine the number of people involved and rounds fired...AT&T is also developing a new digital dashboard that gives cities a high-level look at their communities’ conditions. The Smart City Network Operation Center (SC-NOC) offers cities a dashboard view of how assets are performing in near-real time. City officials can keep tabs on power outages, water leaks, traffic issues, and more – all from one location.AT&T's sales pitch is basically this: if you throw a few hundred million dollars at AT&T now, you're pouring the foundation for huge returns tomorrow in the form of a hyper-efficient city of the future. The problem with this entire narrative is that this is AT&T we're talking about. If you've spent the last few years truly watching what AT&T is up to and the degree to which it battles progress, the idea of the company as the cornerstone of your city's entire infrastructure ecosystem should be utterly terrifying.
AT&T's been caught advising the FBI on how best to tap dance around surveillance and privacy law via exigent letters and other informal requests for consumer data. AT&T whistle blower Mark Klein also exposed how the teclo was splitting fiber feeds and providing the NSA with real-time access to absolutely any and every shred of data touching the AT&T network. Leak upon leak has highlighted AT&T's "extreme willingness" to snuggle up to intelligence agencies to the detriment of consumer privacy and the law,
And that's just AT&T's surveillance history. The telco has also been at the heart of seemingly-endless fraud complaints over the last few years. AT&T was forced to pay numerous fines last year for extremely shady behavior, from ripping off programs intended for the poor, to enabling others to rip off programs designed for the hearing impaired. The telco was also caught repeatedly lying to its customers, and was even busted for making its bills intentionally more difficult to read -- just so scammers would have an easier time stealing AT&T customers' money.
If you review the laundry-list of clear fraud evidence, it's not hyperbole to say AT&T is one of the more dishonest (yet politically powerful) companies in America. And between AT&T's smart city initiative and the company's push into the connected automobile space (the telco struck new deals with both BMW and Ford this week) AT&T will soon be sitting on an absolute mountain of user data. It's a treasure trove of information the likes of which we've never seen collected before, in the hands of a company with such a disdain for user privacy, it has made opting out of snoopvertising a pricey, premium option for its subscribers.
Fortunately AT&T's smart city promises are just promises, and with any luck, the telco will be out-maneuvered in the internet of things space by smaller, hungrier, and more innovative and integrity-oriented companies. As the connected future looms, the smart choice for any "smart city" would be to keep AT&T far, far away from its essential infrastructure, instead partnering with companies that don't treat fraud and customer privacy violation like industrial-grade hobbies.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: smart cities, smart technology, surveillance
Companies: at&t
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Okay just me...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Unless I'm mistaken, it also includes a handy vector for spying on any nearby conversations - or at least if it doesn't have that ability "out of the box", it could easily be modified to allow this during times when shots aren't being fired.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Oh, what am I thinking ... that will never happen.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
AT&T: We can help you gather more data on your citizens, and mask it as an attempt to make their lives better by telling them they can live in a "Smart City"...
Cities: Dreams do come true! Where do we sign?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yes it was a s**t game but did it actually warn us?
Also, at the very least ctOS *WORKED* for its users (when it wasn't busy being hacked).
I'm afraid a similar, real-life tentative by AT&T would prioritize snooping and generally deliver really poor service to its users.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Is this a new dance craze?
Depends. What is your definition of 'smart'? Is it stylish, as in that dress is smart? Is it in reference to intelligence, as in this would be a smart thing to do? Or is it in reference to smart devices, as in smart devices are connected to the Internet of Things so that whomever would like to can track your every behavior? Maybe it's in reference to pain, as in his cheek smarted after she slapped him? Is it possible that the reference is to quickness, as in AT&T signed the contracts, collected the money and smartly scampered off to spend it without doing a damned thing?
Hmm, in all cases probably not.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They Do
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: They Do
[ link to this | view in thread ]
My condolences to DirecTV
[ link to this | view in thread ]
http://www.bu.edu/hic/research/scope/
This is like hiring AT&T to reinvent the wheel, so a huge waste of time and money. From what I know, I think most of the project is open sourced so could be implemented else where without much development.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: They Do
I find this hard to believe.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Finish Him!
...which they will subsequently buy, and integrate into their network.
Not disagreeing with what you wrote, I just "finished that for you."
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Is this a new dance craze?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
Nice try three letter acronym
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Allow them and others ...
Imagine a bank robber who hacks the "smart system" making it look like there is a huge riot with massive gun play on the other side of the city and then proceeds to make a withdrawal.
This is truly a brilliant idea.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Another Angry Post
My take on this is that it's the difference between Techdirt and the real world. Here you gets lots of talk, and little real action. Out there you get action and at least attempts to move forward.
Is AT&T the best partner? There are probably better, but AT&T is around for the long haul and isn't going to dry up like many of the venture capital backed companies that come and go like the breeze.
Moreover, the concept itself is actually pretty important and well worth having. Keeping an eye on resources and assets all of the city is useful, and could perhaps lead to either savings in the future or at least marginally better services. The ore information that can be gathered should lead to better choices in the future.
We have the technology. Applying it and making it all work together may be a huge step forward for the way we all live.
Doing, even if it's not the best ever solution, is way better than just chatting about the best solution - or slagging off those who dare to try.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Another Angry Post
Oh well, there seems to exist an infinite hierarchy of increasingly ineffectual critics. Time for me to go google 'matryoshka hypocrisy fractal'.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Another Angry Post
Make your own website, host an event, build a treehouse where you and your trolling alts can hang out. Far more productive than you being a waste of space here.
Ah, but of course you're not going to do it, because advice is for losers in Whatever's world.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Another Angry Post
What do you expect from an opinion blog? Are you yet again so unable to address the actual points raised that you have to invent an illogical reason for attacking people here? Criticising the site for only achieving it's stated aim and not achieving an aim it's never claimed to have is pretty weak, even for you.
The rest of your rambling seems to be you agreeing with Karl's major, albeit in the most roundabout way possible and without addressing the reason why it's not felt that AT&T are the best partner.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Another Angry Post
If Techdirt posted an article saying that breathing is good for you I imagine Whatever would chop his arm off rather than agree.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]