Settlement In Lawsuit Over NYPD's Surveillance Of Muslims Bringing A Long List Of Reforms To City's Policing
from the suing-the-cops-back-into-compliance-with-the-Constitution dept
The NYPD considers itself to be the finest police force in the nation, if not the world. But its track record says otherwise. It lost a lawsuit over its "stop and frisk" program, thanks to its unconstitutionality and appearance of racial bias. It is currently in the middle of a lawsuit related to illegal summons quotas -- one in which it destroyed documents it was ordered to preserve. And now, it has just lost another lawsuit related to its biased policing.
The NYPD's pervasive surveillance of the city's Muslim population violated civil liberties on a massive scale. Despite being given an incredible amount of leeway to pursue its counter-terrorist activities, the so-called "Demographics Unit" did useless things like pressure informants into making stuff up to justify surveillance efforts and designate entire mosques as terrorist entities. What it didn't do, however, is generate any useful intelligence.
The city has just settled with the plaintiffs in the Muslim surveillance lawsuit, which will bring with it a slew of reforms.
The proposed settlement includes modification of the guidelines along two principal lines: incorporating new safeguards and installing a civilian representative within the NYPD to reinforce all safeguards.A civilian representative will be a welcome change from the internal "oversight" performed by the NYPD -- which has been pretty much nonexistent. The program was started by an ex-CIA officer who seemingly assumed he could treat US citizens with the same disregard as foreign nationals.
A long list of stipulations could bring about much-needed changes in NYPD counter-terrorist program.
- Prohibiting investigations in which race, religion, or ethnicity is a substantial or motivating factor
- Requiring articulable and factual information regarding possible unlawful activity before the NYPD can launch a preliminary investigation into political or religious activity
- Requiring the NYPD to account for the potential effect of investigative techniques on constitutionally protected activities such as religious worship and political meetings
- Limiting the NYPD’s use of undercovers and confidential informants to situations in which the information sought cannot reasonably be obtained in a timely and effective way by less intrusive means
- Putting an end to open-ended investigations by imposing presumptive time limits and requiring reviews of ongoing investigations every six months
- Installing a civilian representative within the NYPD with the power and obligation to ensure all safeguards are followed and to serve as a check on investigations directed at political and religious activities. The civilian representative must record and report any violations to the police commissioner, who must investigate violations and report back to the civilian representative. If violations are systematic, the civilian representative must report them directly to the judge in the Handschu case.
- Removing from the NYPD website the discredited and unscientific “Radicalization in the West” report, which justified discriminatory surveillance, and affirming that the report is not and will not be relied upon to open or prolong NYPD investigations
These reforms aren't set in stone yet. A still-pending class action suit over violations of the NYPD's Handschu Agreement (an agreement that was subverted by the CIA officer heading the Demographics Unit, who used post-9/11 terrorism fears to carve huge holes in the stipulation, which forbade the surveillance of First Amendment-protected activity) must be resolved before the proposed settlement can go into effect. Fortunately, the remaining hearing in that case involves comments from the plaintiffs, rather than an attempt by the city to dial back the proposed reforms.
The NYPD has a chance to salvage its reputation. The problem is, it doesn't see it that way, despite losing major lawsuits over two of its biggest programs. Without a doubt, the next few weeks will see plenty of criticism from the usual sources: District Attorney Cyrus Vance, NYPD Commissioner Bill Bratton and, because there's apparently no way to shut him up, NYPD union boss Pat Lynch. Any statements will only make these officials look worse as they'll be arguing on behalf of the wholesale violation of civil liberties.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: civil liberties, demographics unit, lawsuit, muslims, nypd, surveillance
Companies: aclu
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
"We'll just add that to the pile of 'laws that don't apply to us' shall we?"
If said 'civilian representative' can manage that trick, they should immediately be put in charge of solving poverty, world hunger, and allowing everyone to own a perfect house and vehicles of their choice, because clearly they are capable of miracles.
The NYPD has demonstrated very clearly that they don't believe laws or court orders apply to them and have no problem destroying evidence to hide their actions, so the idea that they'd allow a civilian representative to poke their nose into matters which might make the NYPD look bad is laughable.
Of course, the fact that even if the representative finds anything the person they report it to is the police commissioner does rather keep the potential of 'embarrassment' to a minimum, as I imagine the overwhelming majority of 'investigations' conducted by the commissioner will return a 'nothing wrong, no need for any punishment' verdict.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
They can drum up "public" support for their actions by playing up the fears of the unknown and keeping the stereotype of the lone wolf muslim terrorist alive and well. When something happens look at the first thoughts - power goes out everyone is asking if it was terrorists 17 days later after rousting & harassing innocent people they discover a fscking squirrel touched the wrong 2 wires together. But rare is the statement saying trying to call this terrorism related is much to early to consider, it is always we rule nothing out. They keep everyone afraid of their neighbors so that they won't talk to each other and see these targets as real people just living their lives like everyone else while held under suspicion of being an evil sleeper cell terrorist.
This might make a change in the NYPD, but maybe after a couple more lawsuits. It did take that many for them to finally stop sodomizing people & think about holding those who did it responsible for committing those violent crimes.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Civilian Representative
This individual will either be hated by the NYPD, everyone else, or (most likely) everyone. They will be the subject of blackmail, threats, ridicule, and almost certainly lawsuits.
Good luck buddy!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Civilian Representative
All that and the public might have something to say about them too!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That bar might not be all that high.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jan 11th, 2016 @ 6:20am
[ link to this | view in thread ]
FUBAR
They have already shown that previous agreements (Handschu agreement) and court orders have little impact, so what will be different about this agreement? Nothing. Situation Normal All Fouled Up.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
These same categories of lawsuits happen over and over and over again, and have become so common that they now seem like an expected and necessary step in the bureaucratic process. If you want anything from any government agency anywhere, filing a lawsuit has to be a budgeted part of one's expenses. And now I'm worried, because I need to renew my driver's license soon but I don't have a lawyer on retainer.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
nothing changed
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Riiiiight
..and that's where my brain goes pfffffff..... for anyone with that big of an ego.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The Origins.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Becker
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
CORRUPTION
and no one is doing anything about it!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Gummy bear agreement
Provisions that can be weaseled around. Listen quietly to hear the future NYPD whisper: But it is about extremism, terrorism and crime, never about race, religion or ethnicity.
Another civilian representative with no investigative or enforcement authority, who must report to the commissioner who set the broken policies in the first place. Or, should representative conclude the commissioner is shirking, to a judge who must have a good working relationship with NYPD.
And, of course, that representative must report only to those dignitaries...no talking to the press allowed. Says it right there, in plain weasel-text: "...must record and [must] report to..." (as reported, the word "must" applies to both recording and reporting).
We've seen this before, with the "Hanschu Decree." (Wikipedia) What happened to it? Abrogated by the judge, at NYPD demand. So much for agreements with no teeth. Gummy bear agreements.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Gummy bear agreement
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What, we can't be racist fucks any more?!?
I wouldn't expect any miracles to happen here. I kind of admire them for this attitude. It's New York after all, not Oregon. Anyone who doesn't like it can always leave.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: "We'll just add that to the pile of 'laws that don't apply to us' shall we?"
I expect some city councilman is going to see the need for a new city fiefdom, staffed by thousands, with a representative in the back seat of every cop car, sort of like a political officer in the USSR on every ship or submarine. It won't work, of course. SOP == SNAFU.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Define "best." What's the standard by which they're judged? London Bobbies used to hold that honour. The force that drove Frank Serpico to seek asylum in Switzerland is hardly in the running, and I haven't seen much lasting improvement sought since then. Their political masters haven't been much help in that area either.
In their favour, NY is a big problem, and NYPD is a big organization. It's going to take superior skills, organization, and management to keep a handle on it all. Add to that, Albany's a long way away from NYC.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on Jan 11th, 2016 @ 6:20am
[ link to this | view in thread ]