Disappointing: Elsevier Buys Open Access Academic Pre-Publisher SSRN
from the this-is-bad-news dept
The vast, vast majority of time when we point to new academic research, we end up linking to the research hosted on SSRN, which stands for the Social Science Research Network. SSRN has been around for a long, long time, and it's basically the go-to place to post research in the legal and economics worlds -- the two research areas we most frequently write about. At this moment, I have about 10 SSRN tabs open on interesting papers that I hope to write about at some point. Technically SSRN is what's known as a "preprint server," where academics can share papers before peer review is completed and the final papers end up in a locked up, paywalled journal. The kind of paywall run by a giant company like Elsevier.So it's been quite distressing to many this morning to find out that Elsevier has now purchased SSRN. Everyone involved, of course, insists that "nothing will change" and that Elsevier will leave SSRN working as before, but perhaps with some more resources behind it (and, sure, SSRN could use some updates and upgrades). But Elsevier has such a long history of incredibly bad behavior that it's right to be concerned. Elsevier is not just a copyright maximalist (just last week at a hearing I attended involving the Copyright Office, Elsevier advocated for much more powerful takedown powers in copyright). It's not just suing those who make it easier to access academic info. It's not just charging insane amounts for journals. It also has a history of creating fake peer reviewed journals to help pharmaceutical companies make their drugs look better.
And it also has a history of lobbying heavily against open access, while similarly charging for open access research despite knowing it's not supposed to do this.
So, quite obviously, there is reason to be concerned that Elsevier may make some "changes" to SSRN that make it a lot less valuable for the sharing of academic research and papers in the near future.
Some are already suggesting it's time to build a new service (either as a nonprofit or a trust) to take over what SSRN was doing in the past. Or, alternatively, there's talk of getting other preprint servers, like the famed arXiv to start handling social sciences research as well. Another alternative might be just to see if the Internet Archive is willing to take on this kind of project itself.
Once again, though, it shows just how messed up copyright has become. Copyright is not the reason any of these papers gets written, and now copyright is seen as a weapon against the sharing of knowledge. When copyright was first put in place in the US, we were told it was to encourage the sharing of such educational resources. That may have been a lie at the time (it was designed as a tool for publishers), but if we're going to have a copyright system that claims to be about promoting science, at the very least, we should be able to live in a world where it really is easy to share academic research without fear that a copyright claim is going to destroy everything.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: academic papers, copyright, open access, preprint server, research
Companies: elsevier, ssrn
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
"A little tweak here, a minor change there..."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
We need a "non-practicing entity" nation
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Academic publishing in the age of Internet Piracy...
That said, is anybody here with contacts in academia interested in starting sci-torrents site?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Academic publishing in the age of Internet Piracy...
_____
* - Evolution seems to be selecting sociopathy as an ideal environmental adaptation. This is probably not a very good thing. Perhaps we should even be a tad concerned, where 'a tad concerned' is used in the sense of 'Holy shit! We're doomed, aren't we?'
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
With the power vested in me...
Those Dutch cocksuckers* can rot in hell for all I care.
*A statement of opinion, not fact. Although it may indeed be a fact, just not provable as such, yet circumstantial evidence may point to it being indeed a fact. But, really, just a statement of opinion.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: With the power vested in me...
Give it time.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: With the power vested in me...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: With the power vested in me...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Elsevier is an enemy of the human race
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Elsevier is an enemy of the human race
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where's LulzSec, When You Need' Em?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Where's LulzSec, When You Need' Em?
Something about that mention of global, interdisciplinary collaboration makes me think Elsevier's hinting that it will always have some inroad into any and all research, allowing it to interfere with it anywhere, anytime. 'Join us or be destroyed.' Hmm. Thinking about it, I guess threats might be the only marketing tactic needed for a company that's that big.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Open Journal of Astrophysics
https://telescoper.wordpress.com/2016/02/25/the-open-journal-of-astrophysics-update/
So, things are happening. Clearly there is room (and desire) for "alternative" systems.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Where are you getting this from? That's the exact opposite of the truth; copyright was designed as a tool to keep abusive publishers in line. And it worked surprisingly well throughout most of its history--just not the parts that most of us lived in. The 1970s is when it really started getting turned on its head and perverted into a tool for publishers to use to further abuse people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who's the seller?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Feel free...
MST3K made millions of dollars on Kickstarter to make new episodes of a show making fun of movies. Surely there are many more people willing to put their money where there supposedly progressive mouths are to keep things like SSRN open?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
www.science-media.org
[ link to this | view in chronology ]