The State Department Has Taken Over Three Years On A FOIA Request About How Long It Takes To Process FOIA Requests

from the they're-just-messing-with-us dept

Back in 2013, a young Shawn Musgrave filed a FOIA request with the State Department for its cables regarding former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. To his surprise, he was given an estimated completion date (ECD) of December 2015 -- a full 18 months of processing time.

Curious about where the agency got that oddly specific number from -- and with plenty of time on his hands -- Shawn filed a follow-up request for any documentation outlining State's methodology for estimating FOIA completion dates. This is on August 5th, 2013, and he gets an acknowledgement back August 8th, just three days later.

Don't get used to that kind of timeliness.

Two months later, he's given his first ECD for this request -- December 2013.

Only a few months of processing, perfectly reasonable for operational manuals that FOIA officers should have easily accessible.

Except apparently not, because come December, he's given a new ECD -- May 2014.

Well, okay, we should cut them some slack -- as they said, there are extenuating factors, and if they feel they need another five months, that shouldn't be too big of a deal, so long as they-

Oh, you've got to be kidding.

December 2014. A full year since the initial filing. Alright, not great, but how much longer could it take, really?

Oh, come on! Now you're just being ridiculous, State -- the original ECD for the Thatcher docs was February 2015. How could this be a month harder to process than that? Why not just go ahead and take the rest of the year if you're feeling swamped.

Wait, no, it was a joke, don't-

Nooooooo. Why are you doing this? Are you just messing with us?

You are just messing us, aren't you!

Come on, that's not even a date!

Alright, that's better.

Wait, no it's not, that's actually much worse -- how could you possibly need until June? You finally released the Thatcher docs that started this whole mess in May!

... Are we dead? Is this Hell?

Noooooooooooooo

It's October 2016. Shawn Musgrave is a sadder and a wiser man. And we are still waiting for the State Department to tell us how long it takes to process its FOIA requests.

Maybe we'll wait forever. Maybe we've always been waiting.

Or maybe the State Department can hire some new FOIA officers already. Jeez.

Republished from Muckrock

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: estimates, foia, state department


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2016 @ 10:59am

    The Vogon approach to administration was meant to be satire, not the real manual

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2016 @ 11:04am

    "And we are still waiting for the State Department to tell us how long it takes to process its FOIA requests."
    Are we? I think we kind of got our answer: too damn long! (So don't even ask)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2016 @ 11:04am

    Clinton's mess

    What a mess Clinton left behind - almost by design. She loved being non-transparent, and that's how she designed her State Department to be, too.

    Now let's take a guess how her administration would look? Super transparent....or not?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. icon
    DannyB (profile), 12 Oct 2016 @ 11:11am

    But how many years would it take . . .

    How many years would it take to process a FOIA request about how long it takes to process a FOIA request about how long it takes to process a FOIA request?

    Probably not O(n).

    But could it be O(n^x) or maybe O( n ^ x ^ y ) ?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2016 @ 11:12am

    Every Nation gets the Government it Deserves!

    Until we stop voting R or D and focusing on the President instead of Congress, this shit will keep on keeping on! Enjoy your day at the polls suckers!

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    DannyB (profile), 12 Oct 2016 @ 11:14am

    Re:

    Orwell's 1984 was not meant to be a roadmap.

    But we see how that is working out.

    Telescreens with cameras and mics come in: handheld size, tablet size, laptop size, and sixty inch full telescreen size.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2016 @ 11:32am

    Re: Re:

    Drinks can can be cut with a knife or scissors, come with various color patches, and can be used to make a nice sliding lens covers, when folded over screen bezels.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Baron von Robber, 12 Oct 2016 @ 11:45am

    I wonder if the State Department outsources FOIA requests to the same company that does Comcast cancellations?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2016 @ 12:26pm

    Re: But how many years would it take . . .

    I think you've hit the nail on the head: the FOIA request is recursive, and the State department is tackling it with a linear algorithm. Therefore, each time they set a new completion date, they've just increased the amount of work needing to be done to answer the question. Until they change their approach, this is a divide by zero issue.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. icon
    Wyrm (profile), 12 Oct 2016 @ 12:35pm

    Question them, that's bad.
    Question their procedures, that's worse.

    You're already considered trouble when you file a FOIA request.
    Go meta and you're bound to bureaucracy hell.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    I.T. Guy, 12 Oct 2016 @ 12:45pm

    Re: Re:

    1984 has literally and figuratively come and gone. It just took a little while.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  12. identicon
    I.T. Guy, 12 Oct 2016 @ 12:47pm

    Re:

    Wow!!! You mean it's that easy. Wish someone woulda thought of that sooner. /s

    link to this | view in thread ]

  13. icon
    DannyB (profile), 12 Oct 2016 @ 12:54pm

    Re:

    Yes, it would be nice if voters were intelligent and voted in their (and everyone's) best interests.

    But they don't.

    Half the voters are below average intelligence. They like a reality TV based election system. As long as the candidates seem angry about the same things and make them feel good about their miserable lives.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  14. identicon
    TCSquirrel, 12 Oct 2016 @ 1:30pm

    Comment pending.
    (ECD) 2 days.

    See you in 3 Years.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  15. identicon
    I.T. Guy, 12 Oct 2016 @ 1:33pm

    Re: Clinton's mess

    Oh... about as transparent as what we have now and as will be with The Donald.

    Get ready to grab your ankles Merika.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  16. identicon
    I.T. Guy, 12 Oct 2016 @ 1:40pm

    Re: Re:

    Most voters don't even know there are other candidates as a choice. (LOL'd a little.) The establishment gives you 2 choices. It's obvious to me that neither of these clowns should be the next POTUS.

    So that leaves who? Johnson & Stein.(LOL'd more.)

    link to this | view in thread ]

  17. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 12 Oct 2016 @ 3:50pm

    Re: Re: Re:

    I'm going to vote for myself.
    Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil and I can't bring myself to do that.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  18. icon
    That One Guy (profile), 12 Oct 2016 @ 4:02pm

    Re:

    As always thanks for the chuckle Joseph.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  19. identicon
    Quiet Lurcker, 12 Oct 2016 @ 4:15pm

    Re:

    Where do you think the Vogons got their ideas from?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  20. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 13 Oct 2016 @ 3:23am

    Re: Re:

    I could do with Brave New World being taken as a manual instead. That world at least seemed much more fun.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  21. icon
    Wendy Cockcroft (profile), 14 Oct 2016 @ 6:17am

    Re: Re: Re:

    Read it again; it is. We might not have the feelies yet but excessive sexualisation, the shift to the consumer society, social alientation... the gang's all here (except the feelies. That's stuck in VR at the moment).

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.