Stopping Turnkey Tyranny: What The Obama Administration Can Do About The NSA On The Way Out
from the not-much,-but-something dept
Last week, I was a little unfair to our friends over at Fight for the Future in noting that it was too late for President Obama to "dismantle the NSA" as was suggested in a Time article written by FftF's awesome campaign director Evan Greer. I was focusing on why the President should have limited the NSA much more seriously earlier on (like way earlier...), but some interpreted it to mean that I was suggesting that FftF had only just jumped on the bandwagon to stop mass surveillance. That's clearly not true -- as it's been one of the leading voices in the fight to get the President to scale back mass surveillance since the group took on that issue many years ago.My point was really just that waiting until now really limited Obama's options greatly. Even if he wanted to limit what a President Trump could do with the NSA, there's not much he can do that President Trump couldn't immediately roll back. That might be different if Obama had done a full scale surveillance reform program years ago, including much more comprehensive legislation than the USA Freedom Act.
But just because there isn't much he can do, that doesn't mean there's nothing he can do. Timothy Edgar, who served in both the Obama and George W. Bush administrations handing civil liberties/privacy issues related to the intelligence community (he was Obama's director of privacy and civil liberties for the White House's national security staff), has written a very interesting article laying out a number of things that the President can do on his way out the door that certainly won't stop the possibility (or even likelihood) of abuse of surveillance powers, but could at least make it somewhat more difficult.
Edgar picks up on a point that Ed Snowden made early on, that we've built a system that will enable "turnkey tyranny" in the wrong hands:
we delude ourselves if we think they have made the NSA tyrant-proof. In Snowden’s first interview from Hong Kong, warned against “turnkey tyranny.” One day, he said, “a new leader will be elected” and “they’ll find the switch.” With Donald Trump’s election, it is important that this warning not be proved prophetic. While the United States has a robust system of intelligence oversight—the strongest in the world—it still largely depends on the good faith of Executive Branch officials.Edgar then goes through the things that Obama can do, but notes that they "require immediate action" if they're to have any impact at all. Some of them may seem like they're unlikely to have much of an impact -- such as reaffirming to the intelligence community their oath to the Constitution, and that what they do is supposed to be above politics, or even appointing new staff (which Trump could replace, but might not given the rumored staffing troubles he's been having) -- but could actually set a tone that at least acts as a minor buffer. Some of the other suggestions, though, could be more effective: committing to real transparency including declassifying a lot more information about surveillance programs, helping the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board finally get out its long awaited report on Executive Order 12333 and dropping the various attempts to use bogus "states secrets" defenses to various legal challenges to surveillance programs. All of those could be really useful.
Edgar also recommends pardoning Snowden, commuting Chelsea Manning's sentence and dropping or wrapping up whatever other leak investigation and excessive Espionage Act cases the DOJ has going. They won't necessarily stop a President Trump from using the same tools against other people, but it will take away gift wrapped cases that could set awful precedents in using the Espionage Act go go after public interest whistleblowers and reporters.
Edgar concludes by pointing out that if Obama believes in his own oaths to "preserve, protect and defend" the Constitution -- which are obviously still in effect -- he should do whatever possible to make sure that the next administration cannot completely ignore the Constitution, as many fear (and as Trump has suggested he'd like to do concerning the 4th Amendment and surveillance).
Obama has twice sworn an oath to “preserve, protect and defend” the Constitution. Normally, this means making it possible for the new president to fulfill his promises, even if you disagree with them. Given Trump’s autocratic tendencies, Obama’s oath entails a countervailing obligation. Obama’s last challenge is to do everything in his power to thwart Trump’s promises to abuse our constitutional liberties.Again, these are all fairly limited moves, but they're what's left that can be done. Given how little Obama did in the almost eight years he's had, I won't hold my breath that he'll do any of these things, but lots of us will be watching closely, hoping that we're wrong about what we expect to happen.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: donald trump, ed snowden, nsa, president obama, surveillance, timothy edgar
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
My point was really just that waiting until now really limited Obama's options greatly.
Either he never wanted to do it and won't do it in his final moments or he simply can't do it. Let's not forget there is an establishment at work. Even Trump won't be able to do whatever lunacies he promised if they go against said establishment.
Call it some conspiracy theory but after the institutional coup in Brazil it became fairly clear there are hidden forces at work. Even the key figures in the coup (Michel Temer for instance) are merely puppets. The system seems to be working for itself already. Maybe Obama actually tried to fulfill his promises of the "Yes, we can" speech but ended up with his face into that systemic wall.
It doesn't matter who is the President. Things are going to remain the same (unless the people push back hard as we have seen at some points). Disagree? Tell me how different Obama was from Bush aside some 'smaller' efforts such as that health care act. I still believe change can happen even if it requires blood and suffering so I don't think I'm a total cynic. But we surely are living sad times.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This article makes no sense?
Don't get me wrong, I want it curtailed as much as possible but thinking Obama is going to do anything is crazy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Scrub Bluffdale with Bleachbit?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That makes more sense
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: That makes more sense
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Government is the answer!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Besides, he's checked out already. He's dreaming of all that speaking engagement money and how many celebrities he's going to hobnob with.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
There you go incorporating pot shots again. The problem isn't Trump, the problem is any given presidency - including the current presidency. As you know, Obama has lied about the NSA and other matters since the inception of his presidency, as did his predecessors. Presidents are simply not actually going to do anything about it, it is not their job to to anything about it - it is their job to play fall-guy for the military-industrial regime behind the scenes (that doesn't change very much over time).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Yeah, I don't expect Obama to have sudden change of character either.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/11/trumps-pick-for-cia-director-has-called-for-snowde ns-execution/
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: That makes more sense
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
It's like with every single person he picks he thinks to himself, 'Now, who do I know and/or can call on that's worse than the last person...'
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Scrub Bluffdale with Bleachbit?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: That makes more sense
[ link to this | view in thread ]
The problem for Obama
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Government is the answer!
The important issues cannot be reduced to a question of the "size" of government. They are about separation of powers, checks and balances, due process and rule of law, transparency and accountability. Government Representativeness and legitimacy.
We need to stop talking in vague, divisive terms, such as left and right and liberal and conservative, socialism, liberalism etc.
This is the language of identity politics, designed to divide-and-conquer, while we're all getting fucked. Talk about specific issues. Identity politics is a scam. Talk about specific issues.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Face it, if Obama isn't actual CIA, he might as well be. He's not going to do anything.
There is so much power concentrated in the surveillance machine, and so many vested interests tied up in it, that it is going to take a massive scandal for it to be reconsidered. We are going to have to learn the hard way how unsustainable and offensive mass government surveillance is. Hopefully Trump will be the one to make the public understand this clearly (by getting caught flagrantly abusing it).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
Perhaps you'd consider replacing "spineless coward" with "oath breaking traitorous shitbag". And yes, I am aware of the legal/constitutional definition of treason in the US, which is exactly why I did not use that word.
The fact that Trump will be given a chance to continue Obama's abuses in no way makes Obama some sort of good guy that mysteriously didn't commit those abuses after all.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
What he could do is one thing, what he will do is nothing.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Scrub Bluffdale with Bleachbit?
Perhaps Hillary should have had Obama train that artillery on her glass ceiling?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
That, is the funniest comment of the week.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Government is the answer!
I'm not in the least bit surprised to note that "government" is in the eye of the beholder and depends on what flavour of morality you prefer.
Speaking of morality, if the present president had any, he'd be implementing the suggestions made in the article.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]