Butterball Sues Australian Wine Company Over Its 'Butterball' Chardonnay
from the whine-pairing dept
It just won't stop when it comes to trademark disputes involving the alcohol industry. Such disputes between wine, beer, and liquor companies are legion. In such a crowded industry, it needs to be hammered home that the purpose of trademark law is not so that big companies can bully smaller companies, but rather so that customers are protected from imitation products and from being confused as to who they are buying from.
The latest such dispute is between Butterball, the turkey-selling king based out of North Carolina, and a small wine company in Australia. At issue is one of McWilliam's Wines Group's chardonnays, which the company has branded as its Butterball Chardonnay.
According to a complaint filed Dec. 12 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, Butterball states that McWilliam’s Wines Group Ltd. “produces, sells, distributes, and imports into the United States a variety of Evans & Tate branded wines, including a type of chardonnay named ‘BUTTERBALL.’”
Butterball states that its trademarked goods and services range from turkeys and marinades to fat fryers and mobile device software. The complaint goes on to say, “The consumer goodwill associated with the BUTTERBALL Marks is one of Butterball’s most valuable assets. Accordingly, the integrity of the BUTTERBALL Marks is extremely important to Butterball and crucial to the continued vitality and growth of Butterball’s business.”
Notably absent from Butterball's list of goods and services using the Butterball trademark is anything having to do with wine in particular, or even beverages in general. And there is good reason for this: Butterball doesn't make wine. A brief look at its products page confirms what everyone already knows: Butterball makes meat products, along with a few ancillary items. In other words, when you think of Butterball, you think of turkey. It seems unlikely that the company can argue it is in a competitive marketplace with a wine seller at all, never mind that there might be any kind of customer confusion that could occur due to the name.
And the branding of both companies doesn't make confusion any more likely. Here are both brands side by side.
Yeah, the branding of the wine label looks nothing like Butterball's branding, and it has the name of the wine company clearly depicted on it. Now, I'm sure that Butterball will at some point trot out the trademark bully's favorite excuse and claim it had to file this lawsuit or risk losing its trademark, but that isn't actually true. It would only be true if there were actual potential confusion or a real demonstrable infringement within Butterball's marketplace. Neither are the case.
This lawsuit is a real turkey, in other words. I'm so, so sorry...
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: australia, butterball, chardonnay, trademark, turkeys, wine
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Next weeks news
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Might be proper tho
I get that butterball isn't selling wine and nobody would normally think that based on the name alone but I also wouldn't want someone using my companies name on their product without my consent. If the name butterball didn't add real value when it came to selling the wine, I doubt that company would have bothered to use it.
Then again, being holed up in the states, maybe the term butterball is more generic than I realize in other parts of the world.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Might be proper tho
Wiktionary: butterball:
A round lump of a coagulated fat used in cooking such as butter, margarine, or a spread
(derogatory) An overweight person.
There's also a Marvel superhero by that name, but that's probably true for every noun in the dictionary.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Foot Shot
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Poor Research or Deliberate Reference?
If I were Butterball, I'd seriously consider if there's an opportunity to pair the turkey with the wine and give both brands a boost. A lawsuit just drains everyone's bank account (except the lawyers).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Foot Shot
you are demonstrating EXACTLY what is wrong with the law and MOSTLY with the wrongheaded attitude of big trademark bullies: that someone HAS TO avoid ANY/ALL names that someone has for something somewhere EVEN IF THERE IS NOT TRADUCEMENT...
YOUR way is one based on fear...
stop shaking in your boots, kamper...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Poor Research or Deliberate Reference?
so, you think bullying is fine and are cheering for the bullies ? ? ?
bully for you, bullshitter...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"We could call it ButterBags, but that might be considered derogatory to the new receptionist"
"Won't fat kids get upset with Butterball?"
"Let's just call it Chardy Char Char"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Too bad...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Foot Shot
Alien as the concept may be to the artsy, and others who fear math, it's called "risk management." It's a response founded on well-reasoned, evidence-based understanding of the current nature of trademark asshattery and a desire to avoid damaging or even beggaring a company with unnecessary legal fees or wasted branding campaigns. The most casual acquaintance with modern, dismal abuses of the copyright and trademark industries and mere moments of effort with an Internet-enabled computer would have disclosed this particular risk.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Foot Shot
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Foot Shot
it is NOT that i don't get the craven and chickenshit 'bidness policies' of risk AVERSE management; it is that IT PERPETUATES those self-same, self-made BAD decisions and precedents which lead to ignorance and cowardice among both the bidnesses and citizenry who adopt these risk AVERSE positions automatically with ZERO push back and ZERO revulsion against the unust status quo, merely obeisance and the payment of legalized extortion as a cost of bidness...
see, that is EXACTLY why i say 'fuck you': you have gone belly up and given up; obeying Machine without a thought of EVER throwing a monkey wrench in the works, or EVER questioning 'the way things are'...
you are an authoritarian speed bump on the road of life...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Foot Shot
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Might be proper tho
* The name "Butterball" is familiar to most customers within the turkey company's market area as being associated with turkey, and specifically with the turkey company.
* Therefore, when customers within that area see the wine labeled with that name, they are likely to infer (as a first conclusion) that the turkey company has now branched out into selling wine. The fact that the logo is not (remotely) identical is not likely to be a sufficient difference in this regard.
* Therefore, the use of the same name is likely to confuse customers into thinking that the wine is from the same people as the turkey.
Not only does that seem (at a glance) to satisfy the basic "customer confusion" standard, albeit in perhaps a different sense from the one trademark was originally intended to address, it also leads to the possibility of "if the wine is bad, that will serve to reduce customer opinion of the brand behind it, thereby devaluing the turkey company".
As I've said before, I think that many of these misuse-of-trademark articles are arguing against a position which is not actually what motivates the actions being criticized. If you want to change people's minds, you need to argue against their actual positions, not against the positions you think their actions should be based on.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Might be proper tho
[ link to this | view in thread ]
wine
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Thank you
[ link to this | view in thread ]