Won't Have Perfect 10's Silly Lawsuits Setting Precedent Anymore: Judge Appoints Receiver For Perfect 10's Assets
from the well,-there-goes-that-one dept
Welp, it looks like the quite long history of Perfect 10 filing frivolous copyright lawsuits and losing (while setting useful precedent) has finally come to a close. A court has now put Perfect 10's assets into receivership to be sold off.
We've written a ton about Perfect 10 over the years. As we've noted, while the company officially styled itself as a porn magazine company, it was an early form of copyright troll, focusing on suing basically every large company imaginable for being somehow kinda partially related to any of Perfect 10's pictures showing up online. As such, Perfect 10 was astoundingly useful in setting some really fantastic and useful precedents concerning intermediary liability protections, and making sure that third parties and platforms weren't held liable for copyright infringement. The key, frequently cited, cases include:
All of them resulted in major losses by Perfect 10, and really useful, citable, opinions that are regularly raised in other cases. There are more such cases as well. In one famous case, a party laid out how Perfect 10 was apparently deliberately setting things up to have more companies to sue, rather than actually doing anything to limit copyright infringement.In the most recent Perfect 10 case, we noted that Perfect 10 lost big time earlier this year. It had sued Usenet provider Giganews, but the court found that Perfect 10's legal arguments made no sense at all, and sided completely with Giganews. Most importantly, the court upheld the multimillion fee award that the court had dumped on Perfect 10 for filing such a bogus lawsuit. It turns out that Perfect 10 doesn't seem to have that kind of money, so all of its assets are now controlled by a court-appointed receiver.
Pursuant to the terms of the enclosed Order, I am hereby taking possession of all of your "intellectual property," which specifically includes but is not limited to domain names, copyrights and copyright interests, trademarks, trademark interests, and associated goodwill, and related interests, as well as all royalties, rents, issues, profits and income (including any cash) resulting from or generated by such intellectual property.
This reminds me of another famous copyright trolling case, Righthaven (the company that was spun off from newspaper company Stephens Media to shake down bloggers reposting snippets from news stories). In that case, lawyer Marc Randazza beat back Righthaven in court so many times in so many ways that it was just getting silly. Eventually, the court handed over Righthaven's IP and it was eventually "sold" back to Stephens Media as a way to pay the outstanding legal fees.
Feel free to speculate what will be done with Perfect 10's assets.
In the meantime, though, it truly is the end of an era. Perfect 10 has been filing lawsuits going back at least until 2002 (possibly longer...). And it's set so many useful precedents, even as each new filing seemed more pointless than the previous one. So long Perfect 10, and thanks for all those useful rulings in cases you lost.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: copyright, copyright trolling, dmca, precedent, receivorship, safe harbors
Companies: giganews, perfect 10
Reader Comments
The First Word
“Just what we needed!
The perfect (t)ending to a perfectly horrible company.
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Just what we needed!
The perfect (t)ending to a perfectly horrible company.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Lawyers.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
See you in about a month.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
This has got to be the end of Techdirt
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
In other words: "A Few Boobs Shamed a Bunch of Dicks"
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This has got to be the end of Techdirt
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This has got to be the end of Techdirt
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This has got to be the end of Techdirt
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Ok, new plan!
2) Sue LOTS of big companies in districts where the judges are reasonable.
3) Lose cases.
4) Appeal and lose some more.
5) Set good precedent.
6) Declare bankruptcy.
7) Go to 1.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: This has got to be the end of Techdirt
Between the Prenda saga finally coming to a close and Perfect 10 shutting down half of Techdirt's content will be gone. How are you guys going to survive without their continual antics?
Oh, were it true that due to two large fools being shut down that Techdirt would have no further worthwhile news to comment upon.
However, fools are like Hydras and Sinners. Their name is legion and even if a few heads are hewed off, two or more spring up in their place. For an example, see the current administrations' comedian full employment act(s).
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
"Perfect 10 has also gotten us some great language for copyright plaintiffs" Link
Not any more, asshole! Hahahahahaha!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
and associated goodwill,
(snort)
[ link to this | view in thread ]
And this just in...
...a Perfect 10!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
And free you felt, speculate you did. Perfectly.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
Mr. Ayyadurai, you seem as if you need professional help — and not the kind a lawyer provides.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Yes, because blaming the victim always works.
If Shiva Ayyadurai wants respect, he can start by proving how his "EMAIL" program had any influence on the development of email as we know it today. I mean, if his work was such a breakthrough and super important and all, how come nobody but him says his program had a damned thing to do with influencing the development of email?
It is a simple question: How did his work influence the development of email? If he cannot answer that, he deserves no respect.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Yes, because blaming the victim always works.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Yes, because blaming the victim always works.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
Go on, sate your mental instability. Prove to the planet once and for all that you advocate idiocracy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Just what we needed!
[ link to this | view in thread ]