General Franco Is Still Dead And Michelle Lee Is Still Director Of The US Patent Office
from the moving-on dept
Last month, we wrote about the truly bizarre situation in which no one in the federal government seemed willing to say who was in charge of the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). You see, there had been widespread reports right before the inauguration that the current director, Michelle Lee (who's been really, really good at the job) was being kept on in that role. But, for some reason, the Commerce Department's website listed the role as vacant. And there were a series of other confusing and conflicting signs. But the most bizarre part was that the USPTO and the Commerce Department simply refused to say who was in charge. Which is... weird.
Late on Friday, it appears that the Commerce Department responded to two separate FOIA requests simultaneously, from the two sites that had been covering the issue most closely, Patently-O and IP Watchdog, confirming that Lee remains the Director:
Dennis Crouch, who runs Patently-O, notes that, while it's bizarre that no one would respond (especially since Lee was retaining the role, not moving into it...), it's time to move on. IP Watchdog, who has long hated Lee for daring to recognize that over patenting and bad patents can be serious problems, is still agitating to get Lee removed. Thankfully, that looks like a long shot. And that's doubly good, since one of the other people gunning for the slot was former chief judge at CAFC (the appeals court that handles patent cases) Randall Rader. Rader, who resigned over an ethics scandal, was a key component in making the patent system worse during his time on the court. So, for now, at least, a bullet has been dodged.
Still, it's quite bizarre that this whole thing happened in the first place. What was so hard about having the USPTO or Commerce Department just admit that Michelle Lee was still the director?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: commerce department, michelle lee, patents, uspto
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Not unusual
And I suspect the PTO was a very low priority for the WH, so thus it took them over a month to 'OK' telling the truth to everyone. *shrug*
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not unusual
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not unusual
[ link to this | view in thread ]
I'm not sure how big a sigh of relief is in order, if the experience of (now former) US Attorney Preet Bharara is any indication...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Jeff Danziger's cartoon of today says it all
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Why is it that ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Not unusual
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Easy.
As long as the USPTO does not admit to being run by Michelle Lee, Trump does not know to fire her.
It's similar to the EPA stalling on providing the Trumpets with a list of scientists having lent support to human-caused climate change theses.
The USPTO feels that they are doing a good job under direction of Lee, so they want to keep her out of the focus of the "good is bad" Trump government for as long as possible.
Only a dysfunctional agency offers its officials the individual leeway to wallow in corruption^W^W^W flexibly respond to the needs of a free market economy.
You can see how this works with the FCC.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why is it that ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Jeff Danziger's cartoon of today says it all
For future readers coming across this, the date-specific link is here.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Easy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Why is it that ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Why is it that ...
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Easy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re:
I am Mike Masnick!.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Not unusual
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Easy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Easy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Easy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Easy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Easy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Re: Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Easy.
[ link to this | view in thread ]