Tractor Owners Using Pirated Firmware To Dodge John Deere's Ham-Fisted Attempt To Monopolize Repair
from the you-don't-own-what-you-buy dept
We've been noting for a while how numerous states have been pushing so-called "right to repair" bills, which would make it easier for consumers to repair their own products and find replacement parts and tools. Not surprisingly, many tech companies have been working overtime to kill these bills. That includes Apple, which recently proclaimed that Nebraska's right to repair bill would turn the state into a nefarious playground for hackers. Opposition also includes Sony and Microsoft, which both tend to enjoy a repair monopoly on their respective video game consoles.
Whether coming from Apple, Sony, or Microsoft, opposition to these bills usually focuses on the three (false) ideas: the bills will make users less safe, somehow "compromise" intellectual property, and open the door to cybersecurity theft.
But it's easy to lose track of what started the recent groundswell of consumer support for these bills: the lowly tractor.
It was John Deere's decision to implement a draconian lockdown on "unauthorized repairs" that has magically turned countless ordinary citizens into technology policy activists. A lengthy EULA the company required customers to sign last October forbids the lion-share of repair or modification of tractors customers thought they owned, simultaneously banning these consumers from suing over "crop loss, lost profits, loss of goodwill, loss of use of equipment … arising from the performance or non-performance of any aspect of the software."
Needless to say, most of the company's customers weren't particularly impressed by the restrictions, which let companies monopolize repair, but hurt farmers' livelihoods by forcing them to visit only "authorized" repair shops that may be countless miles away from the farm. As a result, many of these folks have amusingly turned toward using unauthorized tractor firmware pirated and modified in Eastern Europe to free themselves of arbitrary, obnoxious and unnecessary restrictions on what they can do with gear they technically own:
"There's software out there a guy can get his hands on if he looks for it," one farmer and repair mechanic in Nebraska who uses cracked John Deere software told me. "I'm not a big business or anything, but let's say you've got a guy here who has a tractor and something goes wrong with it—the nearest dealership is 40 miles away, but you've got me or a diesel shop a mile away. The only way we can fix things is illegally, which is what's holding back free enterprise more than anything and hampers a farmer's ability to get stuff done, too."
As a result, tractor owners visit various forums to not only buy pirated and modified repair software, but the cables required to perform diagnostics and install updates. In 2015, we noted how the Library of Congress authorized some vehicle-focused exemptions allowing for this kind of legal tinkering, but saddled the exemptions will all manner of bizarre and unnecessary caveats. Right around that time, John Deere began requiring that farmers sign licensing agreements giving the company the right to sue for breach of contract (they haven't yet).
Of course, if you ask the company why a "black market" specifically tailored for annoyed farmers has blossomed, you're simply told there's nothing to see here, there are no repair issues, and the company makes it perfectly easy for farmers to diagnose issues and repair their vehicles. But actual farmers and folks fighting for right to repair legislation say that's simply not the case. For example, tractor owners who say they modify their tractors using anaerobic digesters to fuel them with pig methane, say they're technically violating John Deere's terms of service:
"They require buyers to accept an End User License Agreement that disallows all of the activities they say are allowed in their statement," (Gay Gordon-Byrne, executive director of Repair.org) said. "Deere is a monopolist and has systematically taken over the role of equipment owner, despite having been paid fairly and fully for equipment. Their claims to control equipment post-purchase are inconsistent with all aspects of ownership including accounting, taxation, and transfer of products into the secondary market."
These farmers also say they're worried that if a company like John Deere is sold, they could wind up stuck without the ability to modify or repair older hardware they likely made a significant investment in. As a result, these annoyed farmers are the cornerstone of the right to repair push currently winding its way through the Nebraska, New York, Minnesota, Wyoming, Tennessee, Kansas, Massachusetts, and Illinois state legislatures. And the companies fighting these bills simply refuse to publicly acknowledge they're doing so, which tells you everything you need to know about the "value" these restrictions actually provide.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: 1201, dmca 1201, firmware, ownership, right to repair, tractors
Companies: john deere
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Right to repair
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Who'da thunk it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Perspective
These days, it's not uncommon to hear that it takes more than a quarter of a million dollars. I did find this link to base current pricing on;
http://www.news-gazette.com/news/business/2014-11-02/how-much-combine-window.html
So, with add ons, $600,000 isn't unusual.
Not that John Deere is the only corp acting this way, others have seen how it works and are coping it. This isn't any more than ink jet cartridges writ somewhat larger, and without going into selling the device at, or just below, the actual cost of manufacture.
Other manufacturers in other types of markets are doing this as well. Nothing beats the "sunk cost" fallacy quite like getting around the Magnuson–Moss Warranty Act, and of course, there's nothing to build customer loyalty quite like suing them down to their toenail lint.
Some will opine "well, just buy from someone that doesn't do this." Huh uh. Well, pretty much, they all are or will shortly. Not much will beat a hog to the trough except the sheriff serving foreclosure papers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnuson%E2%80%93Moss_Warranty_Act
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Perspective
Since their initial strategy of mega-merging and then building things no one can afford has petered out, now they have this.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Self Inflicted Injury
Do not buy crippled stuff, people, from anybody. If some manufacturer declines to make their best effort to give you a repairable object, then that manufacturer is not worth your custom. DO NOT BUY. Whether or not proprietary lock-in games are being played should be a primary consideration at initial purchase time. Do not expect to be able to make dumb purchasing decisions then have your local legislature, or anybody else, bail you out. Purchasers of Apple, John Deere, Lexmark and all the others, please note well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Self Inflicted Injury
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Self Inflicted Injury
Remember the razor blade business model. Decide what to buy carefully; work out the total cost of ownership. Often, second-tier manufacturers are less arrogant and are prepared to be nice to their customers. Yes you can have nice things which work well and are repairable. But it takes caution at initial purchase time. Just nipping down to the shops and buying the first thing you see on the shelf, is not going to cut it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
The people who make this alt firmware are not releasing it under GPL or public domain. The point is to make a profit like any other capitalist.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Next thing you know, they'll be trying to plant their own seeds.
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170103/05344436390/tanzanian-farmers-face-12-years-prison -selling-seeds-as-theyve-done-generations.shtml.
Won't somebody think of the poor mega-corps?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Can original be restored if needed?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
It's time...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Like we told you...
We told you that in principal this was bad, and you just huffed about crazy nerd libtards. Now you can see how this is bad _in practise_ because you didn't think it could happen to you.
We told you so.
Now,
Do you want to talk about the solution...?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
And they use Polish and Ukrainian soft to do that
Source: https://sekurak.pl/w-usa-crackuja-traktory-za-pomoca-polskiego-i-ukrainskiego-softu/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
One Word
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
The obvious fix
There's an obvious fix to the dirty businesses tactics of companies like John Deere and others, make it effectively illegal by making it no longer financially viable.
If companies want to claim you don't actually own the stuff and are just renting or leasing it from them, then some things need to change to make it just like actual renting.
All repairs, taxes, and fees are paid by the 'actual' owner John Deere/etc, and not the renter.
Nobody pays for the entire cost of the car up front when renting it, so John Deere and others can't charge the full value of a car or tractor up front while still insisting to own it.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Is the firmware hackable?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is the firmware hackable?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Is the firmware hackable?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Is the firmware hackable?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
This would make rules restricting their ownership of the equipment vanish like magic. The power to force governments to work for the people are in the hands of the people. Cross your arms and simply stop the country until they do what's needed.
Of course this isn't happening when instead of actually thinking of the country people are worried attacking Team Blue or Team Red.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
I assume you are talking about small, individual farmers. Considering that most US agricultural is now owned by global mega-corps like Archer Daniels Midland, I don't see a strike by small farmers having much effect.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Required?
Is this only new customers? How would they "require" it of existing customers?
The linked article contains this lie: "The agreement applies to anyone who turns the key or otherwise uses a John Deere tractor with embedded software." An arbitrary action like turning a key does not bind someone to a contract they've never seen. Maybe the owner signed something, but I didn't and if I go to a farm and turn the key this EULA has no bearing on me.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Nothing new
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Only and only
John deere
https://tractorgyan.com/tractor/John-deere
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Devendra Singh
Thank you so much for sharing this information.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]