India Learns The Hard Way That Equating Patents And Innovation Comes At A Price
from the bankrupt-ideas dept
Last December, we wrote about China reaching a rather questionable milestone: filing one million patents in a single year. As Techdirt has pointed out repeatedly, more patents do not equate to more innovation, so simply filing huge numbers of patents means very little in itself. The government of India has just found this out the hard way. As The Hindu reports, CSIR-Tech, the commercialization arm of India's Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), has had to shut down its operations. The reason? It's run out of money as a result of filing too many patents:
CSIR has filed more than 13,000 patents -- 4,500 in India and 8,800 abroad -- at a cost of ₹50 crore [about $7.7 million] over the last three years. Across years, that's a lot of taxpayers' money, which in turn means that the closing of CSIR-Tech is a tacit admission that its work has been an expensive mistake -- a mistake that we tax-paying citizens have paid for.
The Hindu explains that obtaining thousands of patents was not to protect innovative work, or even to boost licensing revenues. Instead, many scientists wanted to have a patent or two to their name in order to make their curriculum vitae look more impressive:
Recently, CSIR's Director-General Girish Sahni claimed that most of CSIR’s patents were "bio-data patents", filed solely to enhance the value of a scientist's resume and that the extensive expenditure of public funds spent in filing and maintaining patents was unviable. CSIR claims to have licensed a percentage of its patents, but has so far failed to show any revenue earned from the licences. This compulsive hoarding of patents has come at a huge cost. If CSIR-Tech was privately run, it would have been shut down long ago. Acquiring Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) comes out of our blind adherence to the idea of patenting as an index of innovation.
India's unfortunate experience is interesting because it shows how the erroneous view that patents are proof of innovation has led scientists to file applications for them purely out of vanity, with serious knock-on effects. Not only is there no evidence that the resulting patents were worth obtaining, but India's CSIR-Tech office has been forced to shut down as a direct result of applying for them.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or identi.ca, and +glynmoody on Google+
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: cost, india, innovation, patents
Companies: csir
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Wrong side of history
Eventually patents might be something you don't want your name associated with. Things change.
Remember: nobody ever got fired for buying IBM?
Then remember: nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft?
Now everyone uses open source, and Microsoft openly admitted that Windows Subsystem for Linux is an effort to draw developers back to Windows. And SQL Server on Linux was even more of an admission than Linux on Azure that real servers run Linux, not Windows.
At some point, potential employers might be looking for things like arrests, patents, and red flags.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Wrong side of history
No security ever protects something forever and all of that juicy information will inevitably fall into private hands.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Did you do any digging into this complex story? Nope.
Did you nevertheless draw broad conclusions about the entire patent system? Yep.
TD, FTW!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Aside from the broad conclusion that the whole debacle was worth it, what did you do that merits the moral high horse here?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
AC, FTL!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
OK..
The STATE, not a corp, not PERSONS, agencies...
Each one cost almost $600 EACH to file International Patents..
AND NOT 1 can be proven?? hasnt been evaluated??
I would sue the agencies to PROVE they are worth ANY money they have Spent..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Worst DG CSIR ever
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Anyone could have known that CSIRTech was destined to fail as CSIR owns no competitive technology. All it has is 'bio-data' patents and grossly inflated claims. Sahni is also responsible for the failure of CSIRTech. As DG CSIR, he would be on the board of the company.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]