More IP Attorneys Predict More Craft Beer Trademark Disputes As The Industry Continues To Grow

from the IP,-ay? dept

If you want to take the temperature on where the craft beer brewing industry is on the convergence of an exploding industry and the greater use of trademark law, you need only look at what intellectual property lawyers are saying. We had just discussed a Q&A with several IP attorneys in wine country lamenting on how trademark law is throwing up roadblocks to a likewise expanding wine industry and the need for a more nuanced interpretation of marketplaces within the alcohol industries. Even within the craft beer industry itself, IP attorneys are starting to recognize that the industry has a problem.

The Indiana Lawyer has a post about craft beer trademark issues that's fascinating for several reasons, but we'll start with some short and sweet numbers that will give you an idea of what's going on.

As the number of craft breweries in the United States has skyrocketed 5,234, a 16.2 percent increase from the year before, there has been a rise in trademark disputes. Beermakers are increasingly suing in federal courts to protect their brand names and logos. The uptick in brawls is linked to growing sophistication in the industry. Artisans who just want to brew and give their neighbors something delicious to enjoy are being replaced by business professionals and investors more focused on expansions and profits.

16% growth in a single industry once considered an artisan hobby is insane, but you have to keep in mind that this kind of growth has been an ongoing trend, not a one-off. In the past decade, craft breweries have resembled the most viral of plagues, spreading across the country at a pace that's frankly stunning. Along with that growth spread the culture of craft brewing, with art-heavy labels and creative brewery and brew names (more pun-heavy than I would care for, but distinct in their way). The problem that stems from this growth is that new players are running out of language. Or, at least, language that makes sense for the industry.

At the California law firm, The Craft Beer Attorney, lawyers regularly get calls from brewers wanting to know if the name they picked has been trademarked. Usually the conversations end with the anguished cry that all the good names have been taken. The saturation of brands in the craft beer industry is not surprising. Stacy Hostetter of Craft Beer Attorney explained that not only do the individual breweries have names, the beers also have names.

The restraint becomes even tighter given the limited vocabulary of the industry. Producers want names that distinguish their beverages but yet are closely associated with beer in general so consumers can easily identify what it is. Since beers are primarily made with grain, hops, yeast and water, picking an associated moniker can quickly stir trouble.

First, let it sink in for a moment that there is a legal organization that calls itself Craft Beer Attorney. That alone should tell you that there is at least something of a problem in the industry. But if it doesn't, please recognize that having IP attorneys essentially acknowledging that the industry has run or is running out of appropriate language for branding signals that there is a very real issue here. It's chiefly an issue because expanding the marketplace and the creation of new businesses should be a macro-goal for pretty much everyone. It's the sign of a healthy industry, where innovation and job creation can happen with speed. But if that growth is hampered by ever-increasing trademark disputes, then trademark law is no longer chiefly serving the public good in the way it was intended.

One thing that is keeping this real problem from being an inescapable hindrance thus far has been the culture within the industry.

However, before an infringement case reaches court, the culture of the craft beer industry dictates that brewers first make a phone call or write a nice letter. Charlie Meyer, partner at Woodard Emhardt Moriarty McNett & Henry LLP, noted small beermakers tend to be a collegial group who want to reach an amicable agreement.

“Generally, I find most companies are reasonable if both sides are willing to work together,” Meyer said.

That's largely true, but it's trending in the wrong direction for several reasons. First, craft brewing is becoming big business, and once-small breweries are expanding their brands and their reach to new marketplaces. Second, once they become larger, breweries that used to abide by the craft culture often let loose the legal dogs instead. We report on these cases time and time again. Finally, social media and the internet is playing a role, with breweries large and small worried that their brews will be mistaken for others' on beer-rating sites and on social media.

How this problem is corrected is a tough nut to crack. But Hostetter seems to think that the culture of creativity will slough away, replaced by industry players that choose to remain generic and not play the trademark game at all.

Going forward, Hostetter expects trademark litigation to increase. Brewers will turn to the courts to protect their brands for a while but eventually, they will find all the work that goes into applying for trademarks, fending off litigation and preventing infringement is too much trouble.

At that point, the industry will shift. Hostetter believes brewers will turn from giving their beers creative names to generic labels.

Which, when viewed from the original purpose of trademark law, would be fairly incredible. The idea behind trademarks is to encourage distinctive branding to keep the public informed as to the origin of a product. If trademark law becomes such an impenetrable barrier to business that a chunk of the industry decides to proactively go generic, then trademark law has done the opposite of that.

And that would be too bad. Trademark law has a valid purpose, but it can't be such a barrier to entry for new businesses that an entire industry chooses to shirk it instead.

Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

Filed Under: craft beer, trademark


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 25 Apr 2017 @ 7:12pm

    More trademark lawsuits? Now that's something I can drink to!

    -- A Concerned Lawyer

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. icon
    orbitalinsertion (profile), 25 Apr 2017 @ 8:45pm

    I am wondering what "generic" would look like, and how that wouldn't be a bigger problem.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 25 Apr 2017 @ 9:50pm

    Response to: orbitalinsertion on Apr 25th, 2017 @ 8:45pm

    Simple. It's like how sole proprietors name themselves. [Name] [Service].

    In this case, [Name of brewer] [Type of beer or wine using generic, traditional terms] with [literal name of ingredient that distinguishes this beer or wine]

    It's a simple naming convention that prevents trademarks.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    CharlieBrown, 25 Apr 2017 @ 11:57pm

    Craft Draught made in Tenessee by Joe Bolw And His Mates

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. icon
    PaulT (profile), 26 Apr 2017 @ 2:40am

    Re:

    "I am wondering what "generic" would look like"

    Not a fan of Repo Man, huh?

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087995/trivia?item=tr0792948

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. icon
    JustMe (profile), 26 Apr 2017 @ 8:04am

    I don't necessarily disagree about the future trend, and yet

    We've seen time and again how overly litigious mark owners keep overreacting to generic words.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  7. identicon
    Richard, 26 Apr 2017 @ 8:38am

    Beer naming

    Here in the UK ales (and ciders) often have very odd names, sometimes after local people, places, events; sometimes just something that sounds interesting. We don't seem to have problems finding new names or rehashing old ones.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  8. identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 26 Apr 2017 @ 9:32am

    “Generally, I find most companies are reasonable if both sides are willing to work together,” Meyer said.

    Generally, I find that "being willing to work together" is a good way to define "reasonable" in this context. Way to say nothing at all, Mr. Meyer.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  9. icon
    orbitalinsertion (profile), 26 Apr 2017 @ 1:59pm

    Re: Response to: orbitalinsertion on Apr 25th, 2017 @ 8:45pm

    I still imagine enough of a problem with brewery names. The rest of a generic label may not be distinguishable enough from another similar product ("confusion"). It may avoid trademarks, but not the problem that they all cry and whine over with trademarks in the first place.

    Bill G.'s Pumpkin Spice Lager
    Bill M.'s Pumpkin Spice Lager

    We can't have a trademark litigation festival, but the thing we decided that we have to Pertect Ar Terdmerks! over has not changed.

    So why not just relax on the damn perception of trademark infringement around every corner? Or is this like an addiction thing, where you can't have a trademark without overindulging?

    link to this | view in thread ]

  10. icon
    orbitalinsertion (profile), 26 Apr 2017 @ 2:01pm

    Re: Re:

    Ha! Nice one, centurion.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  11. identicon
    T, 27 Apr 2017 @ 10:28am

    Generic artwork

    After reading the original story, I came across a full-page ad for this brewery in BeerAdvocate and couldn't help but notice how, as cool as all their cans lined up looked on the page (that's literally all the ad was: cans lined up and stacked on each other), the company itself didn't stick in my head: I told a few friends about the story and the ad, but couldn't recall for the life of me the name of the brewery.

    Point is that I think we'll see a lot more of this kind of branding: graphically sharp, but not necessarily memorable for the average consumer.

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.