Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At Techdirt
from the comment-one-comment-all dept
This week, we covered the disturbing story of a cop whose huge number of impaired driving arrests turned out to stem from his arbitrary decisions about who was impaired as though it was some sort of magical ability. Roger Strong took a firm line on responding to this, and enough people agreed to make it the first place winner for insightful:
Officer T.T. Carroll is a known serial liar.
The Cobb County police department supports and encourages serial liars.
Cobb County police department arrest records are not credible.
These points should be raised in ANY trial where Cobb County police testimony is presented, or any background check using police records.
In second place, we've got a response from JoeCool to the Conan O'Brien joke stealing lawsuit, making the case that some jokes essentially write themselves:
Topical jokes shouldn't be eligible for copyright
Seriously, I heard that same joke about the MVP truck from a dozen people before it made it online or TV. It was the most obvious joke in the world, and therefore not all that funny. Given how much humans value humor and how many people at least TRY to be funny, I expect that EVERY topical joke is reinvented thousands of times independently. As such, they don't deserve any sort of protection.
For editor's choice on the insightful side, we head to our post about Microsoft's angry response to the NSA following the WannaCry ransomware debacle, which made use of a leaked NSA exploit. First, mcinsand did a good job of summing up the most important lesson for the government to learn here:
Senators Feinstein and Burr Need to Pay Attention
For the slow class, there is an important lesson here. An unintentional weakness created havoc this week, and the NSA's knowledge hurt national and global security by not working with Microsoft to fix the problem. If an accidental flaw can cause trouble, then a designed-in backdoor has at least the same potential for damaging our security. We will only make our nation less secure by hiding vulnerabilities or, especially, if we actually deliberately create them; we will make our nation more secure, however, if we work to secure our software.
However, PaulT also made a good point that sparked a conversation about Microsoft that is worth checking out in full:
I appreciate MS here, but they have to accept a lot of responsibility for the situation. It's not just about their historically shoddy record of security (although that's undoubtedly improved), it's about how they've run their ecosystem for so long.
Many people have had major issues installing Windows updates in the past, so they make sure they're turned off. Lots of people killed Windows 7/8 updates because they wanted to avoid being forced to install Windows 10 without their permission.
MS has been really bad at separating actual critical updates from other types of changes, so there's no middle ground in a lot of areas - especially businesses where their updates have been known to kill mission critical production systems if not properly vetted. So, they don't rush to install new patches unless they're made aware of an urgent reason to do so.
Part of the reason why some places were still running XP has to do with compatibility issues for certain software and drivers. I can understand why Microsoft wants to get away from supporting such things. But, if they have introduced problems in getting legacy products to run on a new OS, then they're the reason people didn't upgrade to an OS that was protected against this attack.
All kudos due to Microsoft for coming out and saying what they have here, and taking a stance against the NSA (although a large part of that is probably self-preservation rather than altruism). But, they have to recognise that their own actions, not just recently but over most peoples' experience with their products, has led to everyone being less secure. Saying they released a patch a couple of months ago is no good when the reason why the patches weren't applied on so many machines is because of their own historical behaviour.
Over on the funny side, our first place winner is Roger Strong who had a hilarious response to the BBC's bizarre new commenting policy that says they might report abusive comments to your boss:
If you're abusive AND insightful, they let you host Top Gear.
For second place, we head to our post about the Japanese music collection society that wants music schools to pay up for the performance rights to songs they teach to students. My_Name_Here provided a case study in Poe's Law with a comment that racked up a lot of funny votes despite nobody being quite sure if it was actually a joke:
I know this will be hidden, but
If composers aren't paid when students are being taught to play songs they've already written, why would they write more songs that will simply be performed for free? Masnick doesn't like thinking about these unfortunate truths, because they don't mesh with his piratey worldview.
For editor's choice on the funny side, we start out with one more comment on that post. This time it's Roger Strong again with a great survival tip:
If I were ever lost alone in the woods, I'd just sing a happy tune.
Because then I could get directions from the collection society representative demanding payment for the public performance.
(And yes, it's a public performance if animals hear it.)
Finally, we've got a different kind of survival tip from Jigsy — a creative response to immigrations officers requesting account passwords:
"Why yes, officer. My password is the last 21 digits of Pi."
That's all for this week, folks!
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Last 21 digits of Pi
That will be my answer for any question about my passwords in the future. Let them try and figure it out. My bet is that many hours will be spent looking up the 'last 21 digits of PI'. I wonder if there is any way to track that particular search, and how those searches might be attributed to government officials WHO HAVE NO COMPREHENSION OF THE IMPLICATIONS?
Kudos again.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
...I'm not a nice person.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
Particularly if they are armed.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
So I guess the last 21 digits for me would be 597238334626483239798? That's using 'last' as in 'most recent' so they're in reverse order, by the way...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
Your last 21 of 32 digits don’t look right.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Last 21 digits of Pi
A 21 digit numeric password doesn't meet my corporate password policy that requires at least one upper case letter.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Funny Comment
One look will tell you I didn't write it, but you know that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Funny Comment
I think you might have a better track record claiming that John Steele would appeal, and that he would win...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Funny Comment
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...We're all fucked, aren't we?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to: Anonymous Coward on May 21st, 2017 @ 6:50pm
Suckers.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Response to: Anonymous Coward on May 21st, 2017 @ 6:50pm
Occam's razor suggests that My_Name_Here just isn't that insightful or humorous, save for this one time. And apparently he's still not happy. I know you can't please everyone all of the time, but it looks like this guy can't be pleased any of the time.
Also, if you're going to post from your mobile phone, pausing to spellcheck phrases like "techdirt that" might help you put your point across instead of looking like a raging douchebag.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
I Still Like ...
this one.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
https://twitter.com/m8urnett/status/866353982217699328
It's baffling to see them getting away with it, especially with businesses.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]