Boston Globe Blocks Readers Using Privacy Modes In Browsers
from the noncognito dept
While the Boston Globe has had a paywall on its site for some time -- the metered sort that lets you read a certain number of articles for free before insisting you sign up for an account with a subcription -- that paywall also featured an open tunnel allowing anyone running their browsers in private or incognito mode to drive right through it. This workaround was well known and used since at least 2014, although hunting around on google search results seems to make it clear that this was all found out because people generally like to use privacy and incognito modes in their browsers for the very reasons the browsers developed them: security and privacy.
Two things that perhaps the folks at the Boston Globe don't consider terribly important as they have elected to simply block all readership from browsers running in privacy modes unless the reader signs up for a subscription.
The Boston Globe website is closing off a hole in its paywall by preventing visitors who aren't logged in from reading articles in a browser's private mode.
"You're using a browser set to private or incognito mode" is the message given to BostonGlobe.com visitors who click on articles in private mode. "To continue reading articles in this mode, please log in to your Globe account." People who aren't already Globe subscribers are urged to subscribe.
It's a strange request for a couple of reasons. First, many privacy modes don't even keep sites from tracking what you're doing. They do, however, tend to limit the ability to track you across multiple different sites as you browse. Second, there is still a laughably easy workaround for anyone that wants to keep seeing free articles from the Boston Globe without a subscription: simply delete all cookies from the Boston Globe off of your computer and, voila, you get more free articles. Regardless of both, punishing readers for their privacy concerns probably isn't the best way to build subscription bases.
The Globe policy is a case of "disrespecting user preferences," Electronic Frontier Foundation Senior Staff Technologist Alexei Miagkov told Ars. Miagkov was not aware of any other sites blocking users in private browsing mode.
Logging into the website in private mode puts your privacy at risk, he said. "By logging in you make it easy for them to keep tracking you, to keep building their (advertising) user profiles," he said. "They may also sync their tracking data with their advertising partners whereas if you hadn't logged in, those advertising partners might see a new visitor for every new incognito session."
It's worth noting that this isn't a technical limitation, but a choice that the Globe is making almost certainly for those advertising reasons. There are many newspaper sites that have managed to allow for free articles in privacy modes, such as The Chicago Tribune and USA Today. Whatever you think of paywalls generally, I can't imagine how this disregard for readers' privacy choices builds a path to long term paywall success.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Filed Under: browsers, incongnito, news, newspapers, paywalls, private mode
Companies: boston globe
Reader Comments
The First Word
“made the First Word by Dark Helmet
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re:
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
An issue that will probably be fixed
My bet is Mozilla and (maybe) the Chromium team will work on preventing this sort of detection in the future.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: An issue that will probably be fixed
How would you stop it? They can try to set a cookie, maybe from another domain (ad network), and if you don't send it back they'll block you. If the browser sends it back, users can be tracked, so why have a privacy mode?
The only real fix would be to use some sort of content-based peer-to-peer network so we could verify all users get exactly the same page and dependencies, and they wouldn't have to talk to the Globe's servers at all... which would rule out tracking, but why would the Globe go for that?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: An issue that will probably be fixed
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Re: Re: An issue that will probably be fixed
Firefox already has it: Preferences / Privacy / Always use private browsing mode / Accept cookies from sites... keep until (I close Firefox)
Sites will be able to track you while the browser is open. Adding an "until I close the tab" option would be good, but even then, the site and ad network will be able to collude if it's permissive enough to be undetectable.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
My browsers are set to delete all cookies automatically when I close them. That's not to get free news; it's a basic privacy measure.
It means I have to enter my Techdirt credentials once or twice a day, but that's a small price to pay.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re:
Firefox has an "exceptions" list for cookies. It looks possible to just "Allow" techdirt.com even if the others are session-only.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Firefox Add-ons
This is one reason Self Destructing Cookies add-on is so dang nice. Cookies are automatically deleted once you navigate away from a site.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Firefox Add-ons
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
uBlock
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: uBlock
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Just noticed this trend? Can't see bad parts to the internet, then.
... (I can surely skip what should be familiar to techies, right?) ...
Oh, and Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, and Google are ALL spying on you big time, along with every other corporation that can. As Snowden (remember him?) mentioned in 2013, and was forgotten with just the NSA blamed.
You have no privacy on teh internets. The few who wish it will soon have no choice but to give up all modernities: they're already abolishing cash in Europe.
Seems like was a book predicting universal spying and control system, named 1980-something...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Call me cynical, but that seems to be a pretty big PROBLEM!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Really?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Other privacy-conscious configurations are working
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Hmmmh
F-U-2.
Have a wonderful day without me. :-)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Hmmmh
What J. R. Said, times a million. Ublock and Self Destruction Cookies are now added.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]